So much respect to the European civilisation. The civilisation of today is European. Not American or barbarian. We are not saying they don’t have some evil within them, but it’s perfectly represented to show no harm for no one even if there is. Yes we can’t deny that disasters were made because of Britain and Germany. But there are so many pros and effective structures that no one can deny. Culture was made and adopted from there. Europe has given Nicola Tesla the full respect and credit to his achievements. His legacy was introduced in European schools, and his studies worked in harmony with their system. At least some of the studies. The U.S did promote evil since day one. One of the downs was giving Edison all the credits to everything. Simply because he bowed to the system, and killed the technologies that may be beneficial for the people not the governments. Do you know what was the great achievement that Edison made ? Inventing the electric chair. That kind of destructive evil.
So who is the next Edison? With excluding the knowledge part, its Elon Musk. So much respect for him before he became a governmental puppet. However, it was also strange that the company he brought was called Tesla and this man does not believe in the works of Tesla. Yes a puppet since the day Space X was introduced, and launched the Space X roadster irony. Ask yourself, why the live feed of the roadster apace experiment was removed from the Internet? try to find it and spot the cinematography mistakes.
A theory is a theory and stating that earth is a globe still remains as a theory. No moon Landing was made, and CGI is all what we have. The flat earth is an opinion also but based on faith and some proofs. Religion tells us that earth is flat. This may be the ultimate proof for faithful people, and the opposite for those who only understand numbers and scientific explanations.
It is unfair to disprove a theory without providing a reasonable explanation of your clam. Although if you are 100 % sure about your opinion, its wise to not announce any idea until discussed with those who know more than you do. This is when we talk about science not religion. Religion is clear and the creator has explained clearly how does the sky work and also the shape of the earth.
In my opinion, There are deep doubts and non sense whenever we discuss the relativity theory and the law of gravity . Indeed not every factor is incorrect, but there are missing explanations, and constant numbers with dull origins. Not to mention its contradiction with the books of God, but that was a result of the enormous tweaks after the birth of the theory. Einstein was religious, and let’s say he made his ideas for a good cause. There is a deep need to understand the errors within the theory as its so far a mislead and it made science go way behind.
What makes you think that Planck constant is correct? And why the kilogram unit is redefined and connected to it? Is it strictly for earth now? Or it’s just another confusing maze?
As we talk about the scientists and their equations, it is understood that too much of efforts were put to run theses formulas. We understand that these scientists are geniuses, but also there is a fact that tells us not everything we don’t see can be calculated by numbers, and if so, the error percentage is high, unless there is miracle within you. We understand that the process in running the equations may be hundred percent correct, but the identified given numbers are not necessarily True. Imagine you work for years and years then someone comes and tells you that you are wrong. It’s ok you need to accept if you are convinced, or if the truth concurs!
In the connection between time and space, Einstein indicated that earth is sitting on something. Perhaps a dimension that concludes time and space containing no place. If you observe every detail and investigate the equations behind all of this, you will find that the water must fall from the top to an unknown space, based on the given outputs of the theory. This will happen only if you apply the same gravity law that we are using today. The water falls from a known place to a space that only exists in the equations
Degrasse said that earth looks like a pearl and this can be understood. NASA and old philosophers said it is a globe. The proofs of NASA, to my point of view, is weak and tweaked unless someone can provide reasonable answers to all questions appointed. Provide one real picture that supports the assumption that explains that earth is globe? No one real picture until this day. Provide evidences that water is bendable. We may challenge the whole world on this one. Just bend some water!! As 75% of earth is water, provide a proof that gravity makes the water bend. How does the GPS system work again?
The truth is, we might not need all this worthless science when God explains clearly the shape of the earth in all of his books. You need to understand that we respect Eisenstein so much, but not everything he said was correct. Relativity was an on going research and perhaps he would have changed a lot in it if he was here today. Unfortunately his works were out in the wrong hands and did wrong. There are thousands of proofs that indicate earth is flat. Flat with levels and assuming there is a container that holds the water.
[…] Copernicus was a Renaissance-era mathematician and astronomer who formulated a model of the universe that placed the Sun rather than the Earth at […]
LikeLike
[…] وفي موضوع الأرض المسطحة، فإني وجدت بعض الأفكار الخطيرة في من يؤمن بكروية الأرض وهذة غالبية ولكن قل من لايفكر هكذا، وهذا ينطبق أيضا قد ينطبق على أهل الأرض المسطحة ولكني أميل الى أن يكون أهل المسطحة على الصواب فهنا نتحدث عن التفكير الكروي، لأنه مبني على أسس إلحاديه وهذة حقيقة لايستطيع أحد إنكارها. كلام الله يختلف عن كلام الفلكيين الذين تعلموا الفلك من عبدة ، الشمس والرياضيات […]
LikeLike
[…] على سيدنا سليمان جلب العرش، وهذا دليل على أن الوزن وجاذبية نيوتن المزعومة لاتلعب أي دور في هذا، بل لا دخل للكتلة في […]
LikeLike
[…] عن الرياضيات ونظريات […]
LikeLike
[…] just another way of forcing the existence of Eisenstein’s theory of relativity. Well, it’s still a theory and there is no millions of light years away. This is a […]
LikeLike
[…] Space is the sky. There is no space. There is no space time. The origin of some rivers are from the sky. As the sky contains plenty of water, rivers, and perhaps a life environment for the angels, and people of the sky, it’s not made for us to go there, and fully gated with guards to ensure that this does not happen, but entering the sky may happen only if God allows it. Indeed there are conditions to do so. Conditions that we know about because they are mentioned in the Quran. One of the conditions state that sky gates will open only if you are a true Muslim. Muslim means there is no one but God, he is not a person, his soul never got into a person. Astronomy is for Muslims anyways but they don’t get it. They are completely ignorant about it. The Quran has given all the required keys to establish this science correctly, but this fact remains dull for many Muslims. This does not mean that you can’t shine in that field if you are not a Muslim. However, the approach of learning the universe through mathematics is not correct. […]
LikeLike
[…] prove that the mass calculations used in the law of relativity is correct, we need to witness a live trusted experiment within the […]
LikeLike
[…] And why can’t we accept that people make mistakes and not every theory is correct? […]
LikeLike
[…] is by experimenting a certain area in the Antarctic continent . If we free our minds from any mass based theory, then we will be able to learn how to […]
LikeLike
[…] منهم ناتج عن قلة معرفة وفهم الأمور بالطريقة الخاطئة ( عن طريق الرياضيات مثلاً) ولكن هل يعقل هذا؟ بالتأكيد أن هناك من يخطط ويدبر لكل […]
LikeLike