A solar deity

What is the origin of the globe theory?

6913CB06-8402-4EAC-BAB4-527646CDC54C

This article does not intend to find the truth about  moon landing stories or to ensure that NASA already know that earth is flat, as a massive numbers of investigations were already made and found that there are political agendas behind all of this. Also, it’s known that hiding the truth about the shape of the earth enforces the idea that promotes science over religion.

167ADA64-665F-47C6-B807-A26B6EA11EFB

 

This article aims to provide a brief about  the root of all the theories that NASA relied on, and successfully turned them into facts by applying state of art manipulations, supported with big budgets and massive media coverage.

9AB6F342-328C-4941-B226-869DBD0A03D4.jpeg

 

Let’s copy some definitions from Wikipedia. 

A solar deity (also sun god or sun goddess) is a sky deity who represents the Sun, or an aspect of it, usually by its perceived power and strength. Solar deities and sun worship can be found throughout most of recorded history in various forms. The Sun is sometimes referred to by its Latin name Sol or by its Greek name Helios. 

Heliocentrism is the astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the center of the Solar System. Historically, heliocentrism was opposed to geocentrism, which placed the Earth at the center. The notion that the Earth revolves around the Sun had been proposed as early as the 3rd century BC by Aristarchus of Samos, but at least in the medieval world, Aristarchus’s heliocentrism attracted little attention—possibly because of the loss of scientific works of the Hellenistic Era.

 

DD738CC8-CBD3-443C-B4B2-F4AB73CFF280

Nicolaus Copernicus was a Renaissance-era mathematician and astronomer who formulated a model of the universe that placed the Sun rather than the Earth at the center of the universe, in all likelihood independently of Aristarchus of Samos, who had formulated such a model some earlier.

 

BD3664AB-E013-4EA7-8B9E-9970B27D4E1C

Indeed there is a great link between worshiping the sun, Heliocentrism, and the revolution of Copernicus. It’s claimed that Heliocentrism is based on the knowledge of mathematics, observation and astronomy. Let’s look into those who adopted this idea to find that they all have one thing in common. They are all anti religion people and philosophers. Not scientist even it was claimed that they are.   In the era of  Nikolaus Copernicus, the technologies wasn’t available as it’s now, to let some one assume that the earth is a globe. Until this day we don’t have the technology that can assure that the shape of the earth is spherical. The only proofs that tells us about the sky and the earth are the books of God. All the books of God agreed that the earth is flat. People who have different religious perspectives such as Copernicus will indeed work hard to bring everyone to their beliefs. As worshipping the sun was dominant by the age of Copernicus, and the books of God indeed contradicts with the life style that he dreamed of, indeed there is a motivation to promote Heliocentrism. This exactly what is happening today. How can they allow gay marriage? Abortion? Cloning? and endless things. The only way is to drive people away from religion and this space earth conspiracy is one of them. Not to mention the hidden agendas because of the North Pole secrets and the military reputation and power. 

 

DA9019B8-C53B-4E56-841D-6326288E5503

Contrary to popular belief, the Church accepted Copernicus’ heliocentric theory before a wave of Protestant opposition led the Church to ban Copernican views in the 17th century. 

C7A4AC14-17D9-4EA6-A643-D3FA30EAADDD

The creator has informed us about those who treated the sun as God. Others did the same with the moon.  The reasons that caused people to think that the Sun or the moon may be a God is based on the belief that they affect humans when they appear. Some believed that they come to us, others believed that we go to them. This kind of religion appeared in Arabia in the pre Islamic era, the Pherons, Romans, Buddhists, and other cultures. Notice that the spread of this belief  was on an individual scale, or a small group and has never been generalised

 

C40CFFD1-FA02-44C6-8D67-74F5848CFC41

Therefore, as a fear that this concept of Heliocentrism goes away and gets destroyed by the truth seekers, the soldiers of the devil worked hard to protect the belief in every low way that they can do. Know that part of the zaionist protocols states that the Jews are the royal people of the earth and their blood should only remain, and other religions must vanish. They did that in the American system where they destroy the image and reputation of the Christianity. They do the same with Islam and 9/11 is a great proof. Those who established NASA, were all academics, business and political people from Israel. You can check the records for this. The invention of the “grays” is nothing but to hide how voodoo is made. So, what is the purpose behind creating NASA? Yes there is research and that’s part of the plan. Otherwise how do they get credibility?  NASA is a military weapon and religion killer. 

 

5594FA2A-8863-4D8E-B848-C83A69329BB5

Finally, what they taught us in schools was nothing but a brain wash, and learning the lie from an early age makes it reality. Even in the media. What is the purpose of creating a show such as the teletabbies? Strange creatures that interact with the sun. Making the sun interactive is nothing but a promotion for the Heliocentrism. Yet it is another brain wash, but think, are you a teletubby? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not every theory is correct.

31c197ab-d3e0-481c-b354-f73ecfa831ad

So much respect to the European civilisation. The civilisation of today is European. Not American or barbarian. We are not saying they don’t have some evil within them, but it’s perfectly represented to show no harm for no one even if there is. Yes we can’t deny that disasters were made because of Britain and Germany. But there are so many pros and effective structures that no one can deny. Culture was made and adopted from there. Europe has given Nicola Tesla the full respect and credit to his achievements. His legacy was introduced in European schools, and his studies worked in harmony with their system. At least some of the studies. The U.S did promote evil since day one. One of the downs was giving Edison all the credits to everything. Simply because he bowed to the system, and killed the technologies that may be beneficial for the people not the governments. Do you know was the great achievement that was made by Edison? Inventing the electric chair. That kind of destructive evil.

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, unveils the dual engine chassis of the new Tesla 'D' model at the Hawthorne Airport October 09, 2014 in Hawthorne, California. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)

So who is the next Edison? With excluding the knowledge part, its Elon Musk. So much respect for him before he became governmental puppet. However, it was also strange that the company was called Tesla and this man does not believe in the works of Tesla. Yes a puppet since the day Space X was introduced, and launched the Space X roadster irony. Ask yourself, why the live feed of the roadster apace experiment was removed from the Internet? try to find it and spot the cinematography mistakes. Finally, all this is to say that electromagnetism is different from gravity even if there are few similarities and we will rely on some of the studies of Tesla for this. And yes free energy do exist.

523d719f-d31b-4955-9509-434a77e9aa16

A theory is a theory and stating that earth is a globe still remains as a theory. No moon Landing was made, and CGI is all what we have. This is an opinion also but based on faith and some proofs.  Religion tells us that earth is flat.  This may be the ultimate proof for faithful people, and the opposite for those who only understand numbers and scientific explanations.

multi-point-stupid-flat-earth-meme

It is unfair to disprove a theory without providing a reasonable explanation of your clam. Although if you are 100 % sure about your opinion, its wise to not announce any idea until discussed with those who know more than you do. This is when we talk about science not religion. Religion is clear and the creator has explained clearly how does the sky work and also the shape of the earth.

img_3796

In my opinion, There are deep doubts and non sense whenever we discuss the relativity theory and the law of gravity . Indeed not every factor is incorrect, but there are missing explanations, and constant numbers with dull origins. Not to mention its contradiction with the books of God, but that was a result of the enormous tweaks after the birth of the theory. Einstein was religious, and let’s say he made his ideas for a good cause. There is a deep need to understand the errors within the theory as its so far a mislead  and it made science go way behind.

IMG_4624

What makes you think that Planck constant is correct? And why the kilogram unit is redefined and connected to it? Is it strictly for earth now? Or it’s just another confusing maze?

IMG_3908

As we talk about the scientists and their equations, it is understood that too much of efforts were put to run theses formulas. We understand that these scientists are geniuses, but also there is a fact that tells us not everything we don’t see can be calculated by numbers, and if so, the error percentage is high, unless there is miracle within you. We understand that the process in running the equations may be hundred percent correct, but the identified given numbers are not necessarily True. Imagine you work for years and years then someone comes and tells you that you are wrong. It’s ok you need to accept if you are convinced, or if the truth concurs!

8f998fde-d834-4167-b4e3-c6e97bc7e738

In the connection between time and space, Einstein indicated that earth is sitting on something.  Perhaps a dimension that concludes time and space containing no place. If you observe every detail and investigate the equations behind all of this, you will find that the water must fall from the top to an unknown space, based on the given outputs of the theory. This will happen only if you apply the same gravity law that we are using today. The water falls from a known place to a space that only exists in the equations

IMG_3847

 

Degrasse said that earth looks like a pearl and this can be understood. NASA and old philosophers said it is a globe. The proofs of NASA, to my point of view, is weak and tweaked unless someone can provide reasonable answers to all questions appointed.  Provide one real picture that supports the assumption that explains that earth is globe? No one real picture until this day. Provide evidences that water is bendable. We may challenge the whole world on this one. Just bend some water!! As 75% of earth is water, provide a proof that gravity makes the water bend.  How does the GPS system work again?  

img_3385

The truth is, we might not  need all this worthless science when God explains clearly the shape of the earth in all of his books. You need to understand that we respect Eisenstein so much, but not everything he said was correct. Relativity was an on going research and perhaps he would have changed a lot in it if he was here today. Unfortunately his works were out in the wrong hands and did wrong. There are thousands of proofs that indicate earth is flat. Flat with levels and edges and a container that holds the water.

 

قال دراسات عليا والله لايحب كل مختال فخور

دراسة عريقة تقول ان الجاهل تكون ثقته بنفسه ١٠٠٪؜  . هذا منحنى كروجر ولا أتحدث عن دراسته بعينها بل من ترجم هذة الدراسة وغير في معانيها. وإن كانت الترجمة مطابقة للمعنى الفعلي وراء الدراسة فهذا يعني أن هناك خلل في الدراسة. 

IMG_4185.jpg

فتقول الدراسة أن الجاهل تكون ثقته بنفسه عالية ويقول الله ( ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ وَتَطۡمَىِٕنُّ قُلُوبُهُم بِذِكۡرِ ٱللَّهِۗ أَلَا بِذِكۡرِ ٱللَّهِ تَطۡمَىِٕنُّ ٱلۡقُلُوبُ)

وتقول الدراسة أن الجاهل واثق من نفسه ويقول الله :  (یُثَبِّتُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ بِٱلۡقَوۡلِ ٱلثَّابِتِ فِی ٱلۡحَیَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡیَا وَفِی ٱلۡـَٔاخِرَةِۖ وَیُضِلُّ ٱللَّهُ ٱلظَّـٰلِمِینَۚ وَیَفۡعَلُ ٱللَّهُ مَا یَشَاۤءُ)

ما الخلل إذاً في رأيك؟ هل إذا آمنت أكون من الجاهلين؟

الجاهل في القرآن هو من علم بالأمر ثم جحده ولم يعمل به ( وَإِذۡ قَالَ مُوسَىٰ لِقَوۡمِهِۦۤ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ یَأۡمُرُكُمۡ أَن تَذۡبَحُوا۟ بَقَرَةࣰۖ قَالُوۤا۟ أَتَتَّخِذُنَا هُزُوࣰاۖ قَالَ أَعُوذُ بِٱللَّهِ أَنۡ أَكُونَ مِنَ ٱلۡجَـٰهِلِینَ) 

تبنى دراسات متكاملة ويقال انها معتمدة تقول أن من تكون ثقته ١٠٠ ٪؜ بنفسة فهو في الغالب من الجاهلين ويقصد بجاهل هنا أي من لا علم، لا خبرة ولا مهارات له. وليس من أتاه العلم فتركه ولم يعمل به. اذا ترجمة الدراسة وبتعريفها لكلمة جاهل أثبتت انها جاهله، كيف لنا أن نكمل مافي داخلها إذا من يقدمها لنا لسانه عربي؟

مشكلة الدراسات العليا أولاً إسمها ( وَلَا تُصَعِّرۡ خَدَّكَ لِلنَّاسِ وَلَا تَمۡشِ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ مَرَحًاۖ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا یُحِبُّ كُلَّ مُخۡتَالࣲ فَخُورࣲ)، لماذا عليا ؟ يوجد وصف أدق وأفضل

المشكلة في البحث الأكاديمي  أنه إذا أراد الباحث تثبيت مفهوم معين، فأنه يستطيع أن يخلق له ألف حجة وتظهر بأنها صحيحة، ففي إستبياناته يحذر كل الحذر من هذة الفئة، ويتجنب هذا السؤال ويأخذ بالدراسات التي تؤيده ويذكر نقيضها ليريك كل الآراء ثم ليُظهر لك أن ماقاله صحيح وإن لم يكن. ونقول هذا ينطبق على الغالبية إلا من رحم الله وعمل بإخلاص ومصداقية. ولكن توجد بعض المشاكل وإن كان الباحث محترف وصادق ومخلص. فتدوير الكلمات ينتج عنه تغيير معانيها وهذا بحد ذاته مشكلة من الأسباب التي قد تضعف مصداقية البحوث.  نعم تدوير الكلمات فيتم استعمال كلام مختلف عن الكلام الأصلي مع مراعاة عدم الخروج عن المعنى وضرورة نسب الكلام لصاحبة. ألف مستحيل إن لم يتغير على الأقل جزء من المعنى ومع تكرار هذا والتقدم في الزمن، يصبح معنى آخر. وهذا اسمه إنفصام في الشخصية ناتج عما يسمونه العصور السوداء. 

تعلم متى تكون مختلفة؟ 

عندما تربطها بكتاب الله وسنة نبيه ولا تربطها بمن أضاع حياته في خيالات داخل السجون

ولا نستبعد هذا لأن تحريف التوراة والإنجيل ماهي الا حرفة ورثها أبناء اليوم من أجدادهم. 

دقيقة لا تذهب بعيد فنحن على نفس الطريق وكثير من كلام الله عليهم أصبح ينطبق علينا. 

فكر فيما يلي، هل إنشقاق القمر من العلامات الصغرى؟ من قال هذا؟  ما مصدر صغرى وكبرى؟

هل تعتقد بما في قلبك أم تؤمن بما في قلبك؟ هل تقول بماذا تؤمن أم بماذا تعتقد؟ قلب معقد أم قلب منيب؟ هل تجزم أم تظن. يقين أم اعتقاد؟ من قال هذا؟ هل قاله الله؟ هل قاله رسوله؟ ماهو اذاً؟

قال الله:     (إِنۡ هِیَ إِلَّاۤ أَسۡمَاۤءࣱ سَمَّیۡتُمُوهَاۤ أَنتُمۡ وَءَابَاۤؤُكُم مَّاۤ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ بِهَا مِن سُلۡطَـٰنٍۚ إِن یَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا ٱلظَّنَّ وَمَا تَهۡوَى ٱلۡأَنفُسُۖ وَلَقَدۡ جَاۤءَهُم مِّن رَّبِّهِمُ ٱلۡهُدَىٰۤ)

قال الله: ( مِّنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِینَ رِجَالࣱ صَدَقُوا۟ مَا عَـٰهَدُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ عَلَیۡهِۖ فَمِنۡهُم مَّن قَضَىٰ نَحۡبَهُۥ وَمِنۡهُم مَّن یَنتَظِرُۖ وَمَا بَدَّلُوا۟ تَبۡدِیلࣰا)

قال الله:  (لَهُمُ ٱلۡبُشۡرَىٰ فِی ٱلۡحَیَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡیَا وَفِی ٱلۡـَٔاخِرَةِۚ لَا تَبۡدِیلَ لِكَلِمَـٰتِ ٱللَّهِۚ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ هُوَ ٱلۡفَوۡزُ ٱلۡعَظِیمُ)

وفي الأخير نحن نحترم الجميع ولانقصد شخص بعينه إنما مفاهيم غير صحيحة تورثتها الأجيال ( وَٱلَّذِینَ جَاۤءُو مِنۢ بَعۡدِهِمۡ یَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا ٱغۡفِرۡ لَنَا وَلِإِخۡوَ ٰ⁠نِنَا ٱلَّذِینَ سَبَقُونَا بِٱلۡإِیمَـٰنِ وَلَا تَجۡعَلۡ فِی قُلُوبِنَا غِلا لِّلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ رَبَّنَاۤ إِنَّكَ رَءُوفࣱ رَّحِیمٌ). مجال النقاش دائما مفتوح وإن وجدت الحجة آمنا بها. إذا قالها الله ؤإذا قالها رسوله آمنا بها وغير هذا فهو أمر مستحدث.

قال الله :  ( مَن كَفَرَ بِٱللَّهِ مِنۢ بَعۡدِ إِیمَـٰنِهِۦۤ إِلَّا مَنۡ أُكۡرِهَ وَقَلۡبُهُۥ مُطۡمَىِٕنُّۢ بِٱلۡإِیمَـٰنِ وَلَـٰكِن مَّن شَرَحَ بِٱلۡكُفۡرِ صَدۡرࣰا فَعَلَیۡهِمۡ غَضَبࣱ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَلَهُمۡ عَذَابٌ عَظِیم)، فياأخي لايوجد في كتاب الله ولاسنة نبيه مايسمى بعقيدة، ومعناها فعليا يخالف كلام االله فهل انت تؤمن وتجزم وتكون على يقين أم تعقد وتعتقد وتظن ؟ قال الله (یَـٰۤأَیُّهَا ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱجۡتَنِبُوا۟ كَثِیرا مِّنَ ٱلظَّنِّ إِنَّ بَعۡضَ ٱلظَّنِّ إِثۡم وَلَا تَجَسَّسُوا۟ وَلَا یَغۡتَب بَّعۡضُكُم بَعۡضًاۚ أَیُحِبُّ أَحَدُكُمۡ أَن یَأۡكُلَ لَحۡمَ أَخِیهِ مَیۡتا فَكَرِهۡتُمُوهُۚ وَٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ تَوَّابࣱ رَّحِیم)

Imagination is a way of life

How can we turn our imagination to reality? Let’s say you imagined that you want to fly or anything that a man can’t do. You will need a explanation in your head to state your reasons and intentions behind these things that you want them to happen. You stretch the imagination to what will happen after. After a period of time, this will not become an imagination but they are printed somewhere in your mind. You start seeing dreams about a relative concept of what you imagined. Understand that the seed of your imagination and Dreams were not created by you. They guid and inform you to work towards what you are created for. Each one of us is created for a different specific reason. Dreams and seeds don’t tell you how to create wings so you fly, but tell to work towards your intentions and reasons by doing different things that you did not put in mind. Eventually you fly when all goals are achieved. You think flying is the approach to achieving your goals, but the fly becomes a reward instead. This to tell you that the reasons and intentions are more important than how they are made. Because if you are pure, god will let you achieve your goals. Does this has a scientific meaning? Not yet but some people were close. Is it spiritual? Indeed it’s all about connecting the pictures in your head to your soul. Not a fantasy kind of imagination, but more into a meditative one that base the pictures you see on religious beliefs and clarity with the creator. Do these pictures happen? Yes, here is an example. You imagine death of an x person that you don’t know, maybe a man with no face was imagined, the second day you go to a funeral of someone that you don’t know. You imagined flowers were sent into your door, instantly you mother sent you flower pictures on the phone. Imagine if this is what you do everyday, and waiting for the bigger pictures to happen. Conclusion, imagination is the key to practice religion perfectly. Base your imagination on stories from the holy book you read. Know that this is a bless and you have no control over it whatsoever, so ask for this instead of claiming that you know how it’s done. Is this a man effort? Yes and no at the same time.

Do we know it all? No we don’t

People are different. They see things differently. According to their perception of life, they judge and assume. DONT! Some of us are from earth, others from a different planet. Here are some perspectives to avoid: avoid judging success, narrowed brains see success in earning a higher salary, big house, companies, projects, etc.., others see this as a luxury that can come or go in seconds, especially after experiencing it all. Maybe this is an easier goal from the purpose that we are created for. So some try hard to communicate with god seeking to know the real path that was made for them, following the fact from the holy Quran that tells us that we will never know what we earn tomorrow. Others die with following a different direction than the beautiful one that was made for them. So success in life to some people is to work hard to enter the heavens, and through that kind of work, god provides the rest for the good living on earth. Second, don’t judge imaginative people. What is the difference between reality and imagination? If you have an answer then we assume that you have zero knowledge about this. Our definition of this is based on our limited understanding of the dimensions around us. Same as our definition of coincidence, everything is calculated and connected to certain time, we did not create the universe to know this. Third, never judge if someone is happy or depressed even if they are smiling all the time, or sad all the time. What makes you happy is not what makes others happy. Learn from this to love and not to judge with bold assumptions!

American news are fake news, and politics are evil

A nice article by Time, talking about 9/11 and the insecurity caused by Trump. Few points made me think to discuss something new. The term “Jihadist terrorist “ , using it is an indicator of some misunderstanding, or ignorance. The term Jihad in Islam does not mean fight, kill, or go to war. The real definition is all over the internet. Don’t chose according to what benefit you. Know what is correct and what is not. The second thing, who created ISIS?

Here is an article by the Daily Mail. How ironic to know that the whole 9/11 plan was actually by the US government and affiliates. Then Trump comes with his big role, deals to end America,, refers to enemy as “radical Islamic terrorist”. Let us ask this question, put yourself in our shoe, do you accept if we say Christian terror? How racist, ignorant, evil, and idiotic is what you talk about. What if we call the one who said this a pig?

Here is an article from BBC news talking about 9/11. Words are chosen carefully and a professional level that we give all the respect. The same news from the Daily Mail made some aggression in our hearts and allowed us to call Trump as pig because my religion was insulted. Choosing terms like Jihadi attackers, Islamic terrorists and such is an indicator of ignorance, racism and bad intentions. Simply a terrorist is not a Muslim, or maybe a bad Muslim that does not follow the roles of Islam. Exactly like a Christian serial killer. Look at the words chosen by the BBC editors: foreign attack, hijackers and no religion mentioned in any line. What do you call this? A news to read. Learn from the British!

May Obama provide a complete story of the history of ISIS. You can also read from the Zionist protocols, translated in French, Arabic, and German. Original publication was made in Britain in English. It does not say ISIS by word but the purposes and reasons are explained clearly!

Most of us don’t like politics. In fact the politics of today is nothing but a game of chess, by evil players, resulting to harm innocent victims. However, the game is played in a clever way so people don’t feel the trouble they are in. We look around and see nothing is happening, but the truth is, they are killing you slowly, and of course this will lead to their end without them knowing. Manufacturing bad food to shorten your life, making marriage a difficult task, abortion, killing Christianity and offending Islam, lies, lies and more lies, the war everywhere. For what all of that? For few rats? Power? Ask your self, if they did that, why in the world I can not do better and stop them. It is just a twist in the mind to know that everything is possible.

Earth belongs to?

Once upon a time, a wise native american told me: we shall remain with passiveness until complete wilderness is back to America, then we rise again. A man of faith and true wisdom. You can read the truth in his eyes, and indeed no option is left but to believe his words. The Quran says that a star will hit the earth and a smoke will spread to punish the people of no faith. We don’t know where and when, but it can be tomorrow, or after tomorrow. And indeed it will hit where the source of sins is generated. The only way to survive is to believe no one but god, no son and no father. Choose the religion you like, they all share this same fact. Read well and this means don’t read translations, and pick you resources wisely. We need to understand that the whole earth including every land in it, belongs to the one who created it. He grants, gives, and takes. You narrow your thinking to exclude people form their land, or you treat them like minorities, and for this, the turn will come to you. Indians and Latinos understand this very well. So believe in stopping your government before we see a colonized America

A space oddity – part 2

The accumulated knowledge through time is what made the human intelligence. Noticeably, the last century witnessed a drop in the development of our understanding of the surroundings. We are two steps back heading towards idiocracy. With such crisis, blesses come from the sky to enlighten mankind. To remind the people of the existence of god and to ensure that we all understand that he is the one and only, with no father and no sun. He plants the seed in few of his selected people to make them as an example for all. NASA Claims that earth is a globe, and many believed this theory. After all, It is just a theory with no proof what so ever. Indeed it is none sense to force the idea that supports the flatness of the earth. However,  understanding the shape of the earth and the movements of stars are clearly a matter of faith.  What is hidden is that the earth has edges and is static.  The Quran and Bible described the shape of the earth and indicated its flatness and stability. What to believe  is the question? The answer believe in then in the one who created all of this. Isn’t this simple

The matter is all about ethics and values. Knowledge and information, if not produced from a trusted source, then it is excluded. Indeed an agency such as NASA must have lost its credibility because of its affiliation with evil authorities. We are all aware that the power of money, authority and media, can fix everything. People are not idiots any more. However, I feel sorry for the innocents who became faithless puppets following whatever the devil is telling them. The devil who legalised gay marriage, abortion, and excluded religion from schools. We must respect all theories about earth indeed. What is more important is to see what our holy books are telling us. The holy Quran did mention everything and anything that we know or don’t know. From the shape of the earth, to the creation of the universe or even the gates of the sky and the way they can be accessed. With his wisdom, not everyone can see what is within the Quran unless a hard  work is done with a pure heart. He does not want us to be dependent too. The old scripture, the bible, in the religion of Christianity and Judaism, explained that earth is not a globe. Richard E Byrd, a trusted explorer, American naval officer who scanned Antarctica for several years, revealed that earth has edges. A word from him equals a 1000 words from NASA’s none sense. Neil Degrassi also stated that the planet earth looks tike a pearl.  Ask yourself, how come the united nation did not change their logo which is based on the old flat earth structure? What happened with NASA is that they shot earth from top which will look like a globe. Know that the distance between earth and the sky is by itself can be called as space, a very long distance that space crafts can reach. This is the boundary and no one can cross that unless a permission is granted from the creator. this is a matter of the end of time mostly. This tiny information is stated clearly in the Holy Quran. Therefore, the first person who will provide the truth about all of this is a believer  and a space boy. A person who believed in judgment day and believed that god has no father and no son. Think this, if the creator who created all of this wanted to tell someone the truth about all of this, it can happen within a blink of an eye with no technology and without a spaceship. then look into gravity, god said that everything  is made by water. So how do we call space space and why we ignore electromagnetism.

I want to love NASA and believe in what stories they release through their beloved news channels, but the more I read about their space experiments, we find more lies. Buzz Aldrin, an X NASA astronaut and an Air Force pilot, admitted that the whole moon travel is a lie, and never happened. The BBC produced a full documentary to prove that this was a lie. Read the Holy Quran and the Bible and notice the contradictions in NASA’s projects. Indeed NASA has produced great projects and has great and loyal people, but the fact that it is a US military weapon, people should be aware of what weapons that NASA is creating before they destroy humanity. If you are a believer, no matter what religion, you should have heard about the beast(Dajal), a king who teleports and controls the weather. In case you don’t know how he will control the weather, it is basically through a NASA technology called HAARP. HAARP technologies are worst than a nuclear weapon. All of this is just wrong!

 

 

The space invaders and the future of text

The relationship between technology and place can be a key concept that perhaps will assist to conduct a successful investigation leading to invent better technologies.  As Marshal Mucluhan referred to technology as it is an extinction of the body and the mind, arguing that television consumption led to transform our perceptual systems and thinking (1994), many digital thinkers believed that Mcluhan’s concept of perception applies to the digital technologies of today (Bolteret al.2013). However, the complex characteristics of the emerging technologies, and their rapid growth, may require further serious research and experimentations in the field of media understanding and aesthetics. As a result of the new identities in the features within modern day technologies,  Bolter, Engberg and Maclntyre argued that media aesthetics are not singular as Macluhan suggested, this is because users are not passive anymore (2013). Far apart from the relationship between the television and their audiences, today’s technologies rely on the participation of the individual to create, design, and share the environment (Bolteret al.2013). This feedback circle that the users experience emphasizes on the the importance of redefining our understanding  of how we perceive our environment through technology (Bolteret al.2013). Thus, creating the technologies of tomorrow requires a clear understanding of the effects of modern day technologies, and how they are designed and for what purpose. A great question that may arise is about the level of participation of the individual in the creation and design of the environment through technology. One gateway to understand technologies is to consider the study of place. Before this study introduces place. Place can be computational or natural (Harrison and Dourish 1996). In this study, I will argue that the technology that incorporates the use of natural place is a key to provide a better safe life for our future generation.

Important concepts and movements have emphasized that the physical space is a source of disturbance and it is senseless. The ideas that ensured that reality should be vague and hidden within our output through a selection of information from the past (Manovich 2002, Smith 2003, SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009, Armitage 2015, Kozíket al.2015). This is to discuss postmodernism and what relates to it. Postmodernism served well in the account of philosophy, literature, film, and arts (SHEEHAN and 2004). Perhaps, it also supported the growth of both fields of the interactive arts and net arts (Manovich 2002, Lim and Yoo 2014). This includes the studies that confirmed the connection between new media and postmodernism (Rohle 2005). However, I believe that the relationship between new media and postmodernism should be different. To understand postmodernism, it is crucial to investigate modernity, a movement that died but its roots maintained. Modernity is the “modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence. This associates modernity with a time period and with an initial geographical location, but for the moment leaves its major characteristics safely stowed away in a black box” (Giddens 1967, p.1). Anthony Giddens, in his book the consequences of modernity, emphasized that one of the features of modernity is the separation between time and space (1967). Indeed, this leads to the expansion of knowledge and information, but also weakens our perception of understanding science (Giddens 1967). Similarly, postmodernism is a movement of arts that has been evolved over the years. “Post-modernism, if it means anything, is best kept to refer to styles or movements within literature, painting, the plastic arts, and architecture. It concerns aspects of aesthetic reflection upon the nature of modernity” (Giddens 1967, p.45).  A vast number of studies have included that postmodernism should be replaced, already has been replaced, or it just needs enhancements (SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009).  For example, the works of  Alan Kirby illustrated how new technologies replaced postmodernism in to what is called digimodernism, which reconfigured our culture (Kirby 2009). Some studies indicated that the movement reached its strength between the 1970s and 1980s, and started to slow down in the 1990s (SHEEHAN and 2004). However, the influence of postmodernism remained clear in the works of many recent new media studies such as (Rohle 2005, Manovich 2013). Let me paraphrase my argument to make it clear, I am arguing that the new media should not only aim to teach us how to have certain visual skills, but also we should learn from it how to build things. Familiarizing the physical space. New media is not only for relocating icons and symbols on the computer screen. This new pattern requires a different kind of knowledge. A knowledge that equals the visual space with reality. The question is: How can children learn the real science through modern day technologies ? Thus, the heart of this argument relies on understanding the importance of the natural place, nature, or reality in our visualization of computer imagery.

Lee Manovich in his book the language of new media, convincingly explained the intimate relationship between the software operations and postmodernism (2002). Stated “the practice of putting together a media object from already existing and commercially distributed media elements already existed with old media, but new media technology further standardizes it and makes it much easier to perform. What before involved scissors and glue now involves simply clicking on cut and paste. And, by encoding the operations of selection and combination into the very interfaces of authoring and editing software, new media legitimizes them. Pulling elements from databases and libraries becomes the default; creating them from scratch becomes an exception” (Manovich 2002, p.130). Also, “It is not accidental that the development of GUI which legitimized “cut and paste” logic as well as media manipulation software such as Photoshop, which popularized plug-in architecture, took place during the 1980s — the same decade when contemporary culture became post-modern.” (Manovich 2002, p.130).  From Manovich’s book, Fredric Jameson  stated “Rather than assembling more media recordings of reality, culture is now busy re-working, recombining and analyzing the already accumulated media material” (2002, p.131). This supports the concept of Manovich in which that the software “made postmodernism possible” (2002, p.131). Furthermore, in the brilliant work of Dziga Vertov, in the definition of modernization, the physical space was expressed  as a source of disruption (Manovich 2002). The ability to simulate old media in a computer, that later can be easily shared over networks, that what Manovich was discussing, considered the computer as a metamedium that enables other software mediums to take commands, and combine various media forms in one place, which form the concept of software hybridization (2013). The ideas of Manovich serve well in seeking the answer to the question of the level of the individual participation in the design and the creation of the environment. However, Manovich is a new media artist, designer, animator, programmer, and a film theorist (2002). Thus, the spirit of his works is based on his perception of the software environment, and arts. If there is a discussion about place in Manovich’s books, it is from a computational point of view such as his discussion about the GIS systems. The idea is that the software is taking the command in which software becomes a replacement of a large array of ancient physical, mechanical, and electronic technologies to create  new interfaces that interact with cultural artefacts (Manovich 2013). Monovich considered the hardware as a support that enhances our creations in the virtual space (Manovich 2013). For example, the mouse, the keyboard, or even the laptop are just tools to assist us in working in the virtual interface. Indeed the software is taking command, but an interesting question that I may seek to answer, what is the role of the hardware environment in the rapid revolution of the science of artificial intelligence, and materiality interactions? As it is already evolving. “The cost and complexity of hardware-centric systems can often be reduced by using software to perform tasks which don’t appear on the critical path. Alternately, the performance of software can sometimes be improved by using special purpose hardware to implement tasks which do appear on the critical path. Whatever the motivation, most modern systems are composed of both hardware and software components. Given the importance of the connection between hardware and software in these systems, it is surprising how little automated and machine-checkable support there is for co-design space exploration” (Kinget al.2015, p.1). The study aimed to limit the gap between hardware and software to enable the developers to create rapid systems (Kinget al.2015).  There are different possibilities on the consequences of the next generation hardware development. In some areas where solar energy takes place, the nature is the source that makes a system work, rather than electricity. MIT professor Vladimir Bulović, researched the numerous opportunities in the developments of nanotechnology and solar energy that may rise the technology into a whole new level (MOCHARI 2015). What I am trying to reach here is that there will be a time where   humans will be able to learn, design, create arts, and construct in a different way using hardware technologies and other physical devices. As an initial point, the semiotic language within a computer screen, should find a good start to live outside the digital box, or the computer. For example, the hologram of no goggles and peripherals.

Indeed, postmodernism is important. The positive value of pluralism is clear. Through the important role of “radical pluralism in democracy, tolerance and diversity”, it supported the practice of the “freedom of expression” (Kozíket al.2015, p.119). The way that postmodernism symbolically represents the world have opened the gates into a new kind of knowledge (Kozíket al.2015). The question is: will this kind of knowledge survive with the future technologies? will it survive the new evolution of mankind?   The best definition that explains the use of postmodernism in the computer might be: “that condition in which for the first time, and as a result of technologies that allow large-scale storage, access, and reproduction of records of the past, the past appears to be included in the present, or at the present’s disposal, and in which the ratio between present and past has therefore changed” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.10). Postmodernism is the base that formed the arts and literature of today (Giddens 1967, SHEEHAN and 2004).The trustful manipulation in the artefacts is what made this argument possible. According to  Manovich, the cut and paste is indeed related to postmodernism (Manovich 2002, p.131). The cut and the paste are the reasons of how I quoted Manovich extensively to argue that machines should connect to reality. It is the cut and paste that made me a computer programmer. In my masters at California Sate University East Bay, me and my partner Jeff Stott have created an interactive multimedia installation that uses the human brain to generate audiovisual content. Part of my duties was to design a patch in Max Msp to use it as a processing hub to connect all the sensors to the physical interface that we have designed. In this stage, I confirm that my study of computer science, and my few experiences in computer programming did not serve well. However, I was confident as the nature in the “automation” of new media, enables the user to become a co-author (Manovich 2002). Using the Max tutorials, manuals, and code examples – provided a complete source for constructing a Max patch. As well the user generated patches that are available on the web. Thus, this little previous knowledge in computer programming, with understanding the interactive culture and the internet, and of course the cut and paste, is what made the job done by the end of the day. Thus, we can confirm that manipulation plays a major role in the world of postmodernism.

However, manipulation is great but not in every context. The literature is trustful. This dose not mean that manipulation in real life, or in the computer is always a positive thing. In fact, when some one claims that another person manipulated him, this mainly understood as a negative situation. This kind of manipulation implies negativity, and   needs explanation to change its meaning. This is the case when the murderer commits his crime, and his lawyer makes him innocent in the eyes of the judges. In terms of computers, it is true that the internet resulted to improve the intellectual work, opportunities, and cultural change, but perhaps the artificial environment of the internet is problematic (Kozíket al.2015). Problems such as allowing the inability to distinguish between reality and virtually (Kozíket al.2015). As a consequence, it became the gateway to identity manipulation. As a result of anonymity, the internet became a great opportunity for cyber crimes with all of its kinds (Glaseret al.2002). As mentioning the benefits of the cut and paste, It is also worth to mention that it is a major contributor in the world of plagiarism. Alastair Pennycook, in his publication: “Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism” under the subject “Postmodern Uncertainty: The Death of the Author” he stated : “the notion of the author and individual creativity, and this argument that meanings are in a sense in circulation, that language is constantly cycled and recycled, raise profound questions about how we consider the notion of textual borrowing or plagiarism” (Pennycook 1996, p.211). Or in other words, postmodernism made plagiarism simple. As a result, the internet of today plays a major cause in increasing plagiarism (Howard 2007). As the conclusion of understanding how the relationship between computer texts and reality, a suggestion to avoid plagiarism is that computer texts should be more clever and connect more to reality by shifting its properties. As text should have the ability to recognise the users by the computer cameras and incorporate an automation of a plagiarism system that auto detects and auto blocks. The detection in real time by connecting the text to the physical space, or to reality is a clear suggestion. This is not an invasion of privacy. The ultimate invasion is caused by the advance in the information technology and specifically over the internet (A¨ımeur and Sch˝onfeld 2011).

This argument is all about proving that the physical space, nature, and reality will have an added value to the improvement of  new media. Thus, the aim in this argument is to trace the reasons of the exclusion of reality and space, and to prove their added value in our creation.  Paul Virilio’s views are concerned with the interaction of the human consequences with the disturbance of the physical space (Armitage 2015). Paul Virilio was a prisoner of war, and his theories basically were an escape from reality (Armitage 2015). “Virilio is the last endist, recuperating the most abiding concern of philosophical postmodernism, even as he shows its ominous determinations and potentially hazardous consequences for life in the twenty-first century (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.38). The problem in excluding the nature in the way we collect our information may result in accruing generalized knowledge only (Giddens 1967). The consequence of polarity is that it changed the ratio between the past and the present, which almost they become the same (SHEEHAN and 2004). Which made “The present of postmodernism has come to seem like a stalled present, an agitated but idle meanwhile” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.11). “The post-modern outlook sees a plurality of heterogeneous claims to knowledge, in which science does not have a privileged place” (Giddens 1967, p.2).  “The modern mind assumed that it knew more than its predecessors because the natural and historical science were flooding it with new knowledge about nature and history, the postmodern mind argues (paradoxically) that it knows more than others did because it has discovered how little the human mind can know” (Smith 2003, p.loc 108). “If modern physics showed us a world at odds with our senses, postmodern physics is showing us one which is at odds with our imagination, where imagination is taken as imagery” (Smith 2003, p.loc 231).This explains the death of the philosophy  of the metaphysics (Smith 2003). “Leonardo da Vinci is symbolic. His anatomical studies and drawings in general disclose a direction of interest that has turned eye into camera, in his case an extraordinary camera that could stop the hawk in flight and fix the rearing steed. Once again humankind was attending to nature’s details as a potential messenger of meaning” (Smith 2003, p.loc 207).

The existence of the technology of today is a result of the great inventions from the western culture. The western inventions are the reason behind making the algorithms of Mohammed Al Khawarzmi alive. Dennis Ritchie the inventor of the C programming language, Seymour Papert the inventor of the logo language and the mechanical turtle, David Liddle the lead developer of the star system, Bill gates and his windows, Tim Berners Lee, the creator of the world wide web and the founder of the w3schools and so on. These inventions have shaped our lives. However, it is crucial for this context to mention those who think beyond nature. The different ways of thinking of Newton, Einstein, And Hawking is what led to their discoveries. It’s simply thinking about time and space from a different perspective (Hawking 1988, Lorentz 2014). In Google’s Zeitgeist conference, Hawking stated “Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics” and declared that philosophers and their arts are dead (Warman 2011). With this, we showed both extreme perspectives, the ones that support the arts, and the other that support science. I believe a middle ground will lead to a better future. Somewhere in the middle where this fusion collides to build a generation that understands the arts and science at the same time, forming a new identity of the individual. This will not be achieved by learning in schools, it should be gained from our daily technology consumption. Thus, Technology should behave differently. A question that may arise: Applied science and engineering schools do exist. Therefore, what is the reason of arguing about postmodernism? The answer is because the aim here is to build a medium that enable the next generation to learn arts and science from every day life. A life long learning game or a device for example.  A product of a new new media technology that incorporates text, images and sound . A new media that has a different identity that respects the arts and science. I believe, postmodernism is  a great symbol of arts and literature, and thus, it should not be excluded, but not giving it too much of attention because science, as Hawking believes is the future. Furthermore, I believe science with no meaning is simply worthless. Science should be hidden within our digital interfaces, and not any interface, an interface that combines reality with imagination. The previous studies that discussed the problems in the inability to distinguish between reality and imagination, this inability can be unitized for a positive cause. A generation that is in control of their magic circle.There is so much to discover in nature, and if we only keep remixing the past, we might not be able to follow up with the future technologies. One of the attributes that makes a technology emerging is the uncertainty and ambiguity (Rotoloet al.2015). Then, this defines the interest of the artist in the technology.  According to the postmodernism thoughts, humans are able to learn through imagination. Learning of course will be achieved but to a certain extent. A future artist should be able to design his/her interactive art installation with the deeper understanding of  physics, dynamics, and programming codes of his/her creation. Thus, the suggestion is a fusion of balanced science and arts in an interesting way. Which provides a true situated meaning to a clear scientific knowledge.  Can  games do this?