Receptors unblocking 3

The more we advance in time the more we witness an increase in the lack of knowledge that indicates the early collapse of the civilization. Previous civilizations were much more advanced than us in many areas, as the Quran stated this clearly. One of the drawbacks is the creation of the spiritual drinks. Why it is called spiritual? Connecting our souls to God is what lead us I follow the right path. Buddhists meditate and pray for this following special movements to unblock the channels that connect the body with the souls. Muslims do the same with more advance structure even if they don’t follow it correctly these days. Also, there are other ways to unblock these channels through alcohol consumption or the use of illegal drugs. Know that we are surrounded by angels and demons, lucky that you don’t see them, or perhaps you are not. By praying to God, angels protect you and guid. Lucifer and his army are clever too. They have a control over people when they get the chance. This is possible while the sleep and that’s how you get the nightmares. Or when you are half awake and that’s when you feel them and get the chance to fight them. However, their best chance to control people is while someone is drunk and this explains all the acts caused by the drunks


God has blessed the Islamic nation by forbidding alcohol consumption for them. He wanted to create a model of people with different intelligence that can guide the people of the earth. That was the case if we look at Islam in the past era. The oldest Islamic era had witnessed endless creative inventions, leaderships and metaphysical people. Unfortunately the Muslims of today are way far from all of this. However, we know that alcohol was allowed during the era of some prophets other than Mohammed. What you need to know, we are not talking about that kind of alcohol. The alcohol (gasoline) of today is different than the wine of yesterday. Drugs can’t be excluded from this subject as some of them just intensify the Lucifer effect. This is an endless subject but let’s state the obvious. we aim to talk about narcotics and not any other kind of drugs. Narcos that supports uncontrollable hyperactivity are the most dangerous ones as people act like zombies controlled by demons while they are on these kinds of drugs. Downer drugs cause different kind of harm as everything is statically implemented in the mind. This does not mean that downers are okay, but such drugs cause less interaction with the world. We understand that there are benefits from using all these substances. Especially that a lot of these substances are already in use for medicine. However, their harm is way more than their benefits so as the alcohol. So if you think about the minds of the future, there will be different sorts of drugs by then. Perhaps people may reconsider natural resources as a way of cure


One of the most dangerous enemies to our bodies is sugar. Sugar is more dangerous than heroin. Yes it’s popular and that is just because a queen loved it. But it’s one of those clever substances that kill you slowly. This is the artificial sugar not the one we get from honey and dates. Cancerous cells do live on all sorts of sugar but the artificially white makes them much bigger and stronger. Indeed sugar is recommended everywhere and hemp is still not in the picture. Otherwise how can they benefit from chemotherapy? We do build the mind first, then body comes later and that’s a problem!


God has blessed mankind with all the natural cures for all the diseases that we may experience. Natural cures such as certain kinds of fruits, leafs, or vegetables are made to perfectly match the color and the shape of some of our organs. For instance, you will know that strawberries are good for the heart because of their shape and color. This is a complete new knowledge that requires more studies. As each fruit tells a complete different story. One tells you combine me with this to get this. Other tells you eat me as I am and never squeeze me for a drink. What did we do? We created harmful pharmaceuticals. There is a need for some medicines but not every medicine is made for the right purpose. For example, why do we have xzanax? Benzos? Maybe it’s good for soldiers as it makes them feel they are the best. What else? Know that benzos are worse that sugar and sugar is worse than heroin

Receptors unblocking 2

Don’t grow up, it’s a trap. What you really need to do is to take this statement academically. How can we we maintain this same clear mind, with a better balance in our hormones until an older age. Let’s provide some assumptions: negative frequencies are one of the key damagers to our brains. Food is another thing. Water and Sound too. visuals and information as well. Of course we are talking about the misuse of things, and the wrong creations in the first place. Yes some new technologies were nothing but an indicator of a lack of knowledge. So what if we were raised having a cell phone from an early age, eating microwave food, and everything that prevent this advancement to happen? is there a way to fix all of this? They say it’s never too late, but only if you exclude destructive minds and companies from the picture. Consider the Facebook group as one of the first candidates

When targeting a tech giant such as Facebook, understand that Facebook is different than any other social media platform. Indeed the damages of theses technologies ( all social media sites) to mankind is clear. The major purpose of creating the internet is to share information between the people, not to share their privacy to create weapons of the future. This is a fact. Social anxiety and disruption is what we earned through using these sites. We target Facebook not for all of that, but we have doubts about the integrity of the company. Just count the number of lawsuits against them. Analyze how they break the law and always tweak their way to be on the safe side. Who is funding them? Where does their money go? If you care about the future of you children, you should demand for a change, and start with turning technologies into tangible systems created by those with higher ethical values

يأجوج ومأجوج

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم والصلاة والسلام على سيد الخلق والمرسلين سيدنا محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم

نكمل بأذن الله دراستنا عن سورة الكهف وتختص في هذا المقال بموضوع يأجوج ومأجوج

قال الله ( قَالُوا۟ یَـٰذَا ٱلۡقَرۡنَیۡنِ إِنَّ یَأۡجُوجَ وَمَأۡجُوجَ مُفۡسِدُونَ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ فَهَلۡ نَجۡعَلُ لَكَ خَرۡجًا عَلَىٰۤ أَن تَجۡعَلَ بَیۡنَنَا وَبَیۡنَهُمۡ سَدّا)، وكان ومازال الإختلاف قائم على موقع هذا السد الذي حجب قوم يأجوج ومأجوج عن الفساد في الأرض. فمنهم من قال أن السد في الصين وأنهم وجدوه ومنهم من قال انه عند الترك ومنهم من قال أنه في شمال الأرض على وجه العموم. السؤال اذا وجد السد وعلم مابعد السد وماقبله فهذا يعني أنه فُتحت يأجوج ومأجوج وأننا نحن في الفترة التي يكون فيها شرار الخلق إستناداً على كلام الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلام وبذلك نستبعد كل التفاسير التي أخذت بأنه تم إكتشاف مكان السد، إلا اذا كان السد موجود وتم إكتشافه وأن يأجوج ومأجوج محجوزين تحت الأرض وبذلك يكون عند بلاد الترك أوالجبال الأرمينية وأذربيجان وهكذا. ولكن اذا كان قوم يأجوج ومأجوج من نسل آدم عليه السلام فيصعب بذلك تصديق انهم يعيشون تحت الأرض

فَأُمَّا الْحَدِيثُ الَّذِي رَوَاهُ الْإِمَامُ أَحْمَدُ

حَدَّثَنَا رُوحٌ، حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي عَرُوبَة، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو رَافِعٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ قَالَ: “إِنَّ يَأْجُوجَ وَمَأْجُوجَ لَيَحْفِرُونَ السَّدَّ كُلَّ يَوْمٍ، حَتَّى إِذَا كَادُوا يَرَوْنَ شُعَاعَ الشَّمْسِ قَالَ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِمْ: ارْجِعُوا فَسَتَحْفِرُونَهُ غَدًا فَيَعُودُونَ إِلَيْهِ كَأَشَدِّ مَا كَانَ، حَتَّى إِذَا بَلَّغَتْ مُدَّتُهُمْ وَأَرَادَ اللَّهُ أَنْ يَبْعَثَهُمْ عَلَى النَّاسِ حَفَرُوا حَتَّى إِذَا كَادُوا يَرَوْنَ شُعَاعَ الشَّمْسِ قَالَ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِمْ: ارْجِعُوا فَسَتَحْفِرُونَهُ غَدًا إِنْ شَاءَ اللَّهُ. وَيَسْتَثْنِي، فَيَعُودُونَ إِلَيْهِ وَهُوَ كَهَيْئَتِهِ حِينَ تَرَكُوهُ، فَيَحْفِرُونَهُ وَيَخْرُجُونَ عَلَى النَّاسِ، فَيُنَشِّفُونَ الْمِيَاهَ، وَيَتَحَصَّنُ النَّاسُ مِنْهُمْ فِي حُصُونِهِمْ، فَيَرْمُونَ بِسِهَامِهِمْ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ، [فَتَرْجِعُ وَعَلَيْهَا هَيْئَةُ الدَّمِ، فَيَقُولُونَ: قَهَرْنَا أَهْلَ الْأَرْضِ وَعَلَوْنَا أَهْلَ السَّمَاءِ فَيَبْعَثُ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِمْ نَغَفًا فِي أَقْفَائِهِمْ، فَيَقْتُلُهُمْ بِهَا. قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ: “وَالَّذِي نَفْسِي بِيَدِهِ، إِنَّ دَوَابَّ الْأَرْضِ لَتَسْمَنُ، وَتَشْكُرُ شُكْرًا مِنْ لُحُومِهِمْ وَدِمَائِهِمْ” . وَرَوَاهُ أَحْمَدُ أَيْضًا عَنْ حَسَنٍ -هُوَ ابْنُ مُوسَى الْأَشْيَبُ-عَنْ سُفْيَانَ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ، بِهِ . وَكَذَا رَوَاهُ ابْنُ مَاجَهْ، عَنْ أَزْهَرَ بْنِ مَرْوَانَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الْأَعْلَى، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ أَبِي عَرُوبَة، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ قَالَ: حَدَّثَ رَافِعٌ. وَأَخْرَجَهُ التِّرْمِذِيُّ، مِنْ حَدِيثِ أَبِي عَوَانَةَ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ . ثُمَّ قَالَ: غَرِيبٌ لَا نَعْرِفُهُ إِلَّا مِنْ هَذَا الْوَجْهِ

وَهَذَا إِسْنَادُهُ قَوِيٌّ، وَلَكِنْ فِي رَفْعِهِ نَكَارَةٌ

هكذا ورد عن هذا الحديث في تفسير إبن كثير وبإختصار هذا الحديث حسن غريب وفي الكثير من الروايات ضعيف وفيه علل ومناكير وإنقطاع في السند. وكذلك يوجد فيه بعض الإضافات كالقول ” حتى اذا كادو يرون شعاع الشمس”، والله أعلم بصحتها فهل يعقل أن إبن آدم يستطيع العيش كل هذا الزمن تحت الأرض، وإن كانت هذه الجملة صحيحة فهذا يعني أن ذي القرنين حجب عنهم الشمس وذلك بعزلهم في مكان لايرون الشمس منه، ولكن موضوع الحفر في الحديد وظهور شعاع الشمس يوحي أنهم تحت الأرض وهل يعقل أن يكون الحفر في الحديد ومن أسفل لأعلى؟

قال الله ( فَمَا ٱسۡطَـٰعُوۤا۟ أَن یَظۡهَرُوهُ وَمَا ٱسۡتَطَـٰعُوا۟ لَهُۥ نَقۡبا)، أي لم يستطيعوا كسر الحاجز والنَّقْبُ: كَسْرُ الرَّدْمِ، وعَدَمُ اسْتِطاعَتِهِمْ ذَلِكَ لِارْتِفاعِهِ وصَلابَتِهِ وقال إبن منظور أن النقب هو الثقب أو الخرق وكذلك الطريق الضيق وأيضاً الطريق بين الجبلين

فالسؤال هنا هل نستطيع القول أن كلمة النقب ترادف كلمة الحفر؟

والحديث مع أن هناك من صححة، غير أنه مسلسل بالعلل المانعة له من الحكم بذلك، ومن هذه العلل الانقطاع فالحديث بهذا اللفظ مداره على قتادة بن دعامة، يرويه عن أبى رافع نفيع الصائغ، وقد نص الآئمة على أن قتادة لم يسمع من أبى رافع شيئا، بل لم يلقه ولذلك لنلغي فكرة الإستناد لهذا الحديث ولنستبعد اي تفسير استند عليه لأن فيه تضليل عن الحقيقة

لاحظ أن وصف يأجوج ومأجوج بأنهم ( مُفۡسِدُونَ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡض)، وهذا يساويهم مع جميع من وصفهم القرآن الكريم بالمفسدين كمثل فرعون وعاد وثمود ولكن الفرق أن يأجوج ومأجوج تم تأخير عذابهم الى أجل مسمى وهذا دليل على أنهم الأشد فساد، وأن عذابهم يكون مع قيام الساعة كما سيتضح لنا هذا فيما يلي

قال الله ( حَتَّىٰۤ إِذَا بَلَغَ بَیۡنَ ٱلسَّدَّیۡنِ وَجَدَ مِن دُونِهِمَا قَوۡما لَّا یَكَادُونَ یَفۡقَهُونَ قَوۡلا )، ونعلم أن ذي القرنين بلغ مغرب الشمس أي أقرب نقطة ترى فيها غروب الشمس وأتوقع سيكون منظر الشمس عندها كبير جداً وهذا عند العين الحمئة كما تحدثنا سابقاً، وكذلك بلغ مطلع الشمس وذكرنا أنها منطقة الزنج الخالية من العمران والتي لايوجد فيها مايستر عن الشمس. لاحظ كما أن يأجوج ومأجوج مفسدين في الأرض ويظهر أن فسادهم يعم الأرض جميعها، كذلك امكن الله لذي القرنين في الأرض جميعها. أو قول جميعها قد يكون من باب المبالغة ولكن نستخدمها لتعظيم الأمر والتنبيه بالإنتشار الكبير. اذاً ماهي المنطقة الثالثة التي بلغها ذي القرنين؟ ذكر الله أنها بين السدين. وقول (السدين)، يعني أنها معالم معرفة وليست أي سدين. ولا نريد أن نقول أنها قد تكون من جبال قاف وذلك لعدم ثبوت صحة الأحاديث المروية عن جبال قاف، ولن لنقل أن السدين هم جبلين متشابهين وذلك نعلمه من قوله تعالى ( إِذَا سَاوَىٰ بَیۡنَ ٱلصَّدَفَیۡن)، فساوى بينهم ليبني السد وهذه الطريقة (ءَاتُونِی زُبَرَ ٱلۡحَدِیدِۖ حَتَّىٰۤ إِذَا سَاوَىٰ بَیۡنَ ٱلصَّدَفَیۡنِ قَالَ ٱنفُخُوا۟ۖ حَتَّىٰۤ إِذَا جَعَلَهُۥ نَارࣰا قَالَ ءَاتُونِیۤ أُفۡرِغۡ عَلَیۡهِ قِطۡرࣰا) صدق الله العظيم

فالسؤال هو أين يقع السدين؟ اذا نظرنا الى خرائط الإدريسي لوجدنا أن السدين موجوده في أقصى الشمال متجهاً قليلاً الى الشرق وكذلك قال هذا أحبار اليهود والكثير من المفسرين. ولكن ذكر بعض كبار المفسرين انها الجبال الموجودة بين أرمينية وأذربيجان. السؤال كيف يكون هذا الحاجب موجود في منتصف الأرض في منطقة يعيش الناس شمالها وجنوبها وشرقها وغربها؟ هل يعيش يأجوج ومأجوج تحت الأرض؟ أو تحت الماء؟ إذاً نستبعد هذا القول وخاصة أن الله مكن لذي القرنين في الأرض فبلغ أقصى الغرب وبلغ أقصى الشرق وبالتأكيد سيكون مكان السدين في أقصى الشمال أول أقصى الجنوب ونرجح القول الذي يأخذ بأقصى الشمال كونه يتوافق مع الأقوال السابقة. فسواء كان شمال أم جنوب، الغرض هو فهم أن ذي القرنين استبعد وحجب قوم يأجوج ومأجوج عن الأرض جميعها وبذلك بلغ أحد الأقطار وجعلهم يعيشون في مكان معزول فيه هواء وماء وكل سبل العيش التي يحتاجها الإنسان لأنهم من نسل نوح كما سنذكر هذا من الصحيحين

متى يأتي يأجوج ومأجوج؟

قال الله(قَالَ هَـٰذَا رَحۡمَة مِّن رَّبِّیۖ فَإِذَا جَاۤءَ وَعۡدُ رَبِّی جَعَلَهُۥ دَكَّاۤءَۖ وَكَانَ وَعۡدُ رَبِّی حَقّا) [ الكهف ٩٨ ] صدق الله العظيم

قَالَ” ذُو الْقَرْنَيْنِ “هَذَا” أَيْ السَّدّ أَيْ الْإِقْدَار عَلَيْهِ “رَحْمَة مِنْ رَبِّي” نِعْمَة لِأَنَّهُ مَانِع مِنْ خُرُوجهمْ “فَإِذَا جَاءَ وَعْد رَبِّي” بِخُرُوجِهِمْ الْقَرِيب مِنْ الْبَعْث “جَعَلَهُ دَكَّاء” مَدْكُوكًا مَبْسُوطًا “وَكَانَ وَعْد رَبِّي” بِخُرُوجِهِمْ وَغَيْره “حَقًّا” كَائِنًا

قال الله ( وَتَرَكۡنَا بَعۡضَهُمۡ یَوۡمَىِٕذ يموج  فِی بَعۡض وَنُفِخَ فِی ٱلصُّورِ فَجَمَعۡنَـٰهُمۡ جَمۡعا﴾ [الكهف ٩٩] صدق الله العظيم

وكلمة (يموج) وكأنها تحكي حال يأجوج ومأجوج في الأرض ولكن ماهو معناها؟

يحتمل أن الضمير، يعود إلى يأجوج ومأجوج، وأنهم إذا خرجوا على الناس -من كثرتهم واستيعابهم للأرض كلها- يموج بعضهم ببعض، كما قال تعالى ﴿حَتَّى إِذَا فُتِحَتْ يَأْجُوجُ وَمَأْجُوجُ وَهُمْ مِنْ كُلِّ حَدَبٍ يَنْسِلُونَ ْ﴾ ويحتمل أن الضمير يعود لشرار الخلق وكذلك يأجوج ومأجوج وأنهم يجتمعون فيه فيكثرون ويموج بعضهم ببعض، ثم ينفخ في الصور وتتبدل الأرض وتظهر الأهوال والزلازل العظام، بدليل قوله: ﴿ونفخ في الصور فجمعناهم جمعا وعرضنا جهنم يومئذ للكافرين عرضا الذين كانت أعينهم في غطاء عن ذكري وكانوا لا يستطيعون سمعا ْ﴾ أي: إذا نفخ إسرافيل في الصور، أعاد الله الأرواح إلى الأجساد، ثم حشرهم وجمعهم لموقف القيامة، الأولين منهم والأخرين، والكافرين والمؤمنين، ليسألوا ويحاسبوا ويجزون بأعمالهم، فأما الكافرون -على اختلافهم- فإن جهنم جزاؤهم، خالدين فيها أبدا

وفي ﺻﺤﻴﺢ اﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ

61 – كتاب المناقب

باب علامات النبوة في الإسلام

صفحة 196


ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ، ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ اﺑﻦ ﺃﺑﻲ ﻋﺪﻱ، ﻋﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ، ﺣ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﻲ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ، ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ، ﻋﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ، ﻋﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ، ﺳﻤﻌﺖ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻭاﺋﻞ، ﻳﺤﺪﺙ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺬﻳﻔﺔ، ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ اﻟﺨﻄﺎﺏ ﺭﺿﻲ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﺃﻳﻜﻢ ﻳﺤﻔﻆ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺣﺬﻳﻔﺔ: ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻫﺎﺕ، ﺇﻧﻚ ﻟﺠﺮﻱء، ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ: «§ﻓﺘﻨﺔ اﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻭﻣﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﺎﺭﻩ، ﺗﻜﻔﺮﻫﺎ اﻟﺼﻼﺓ، ﻭاﻟﺼﺪﻗﺔ، ﻭاﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻌﺮﻭﻑ، ﻭاﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ اﻟﻤﻨﻜﺮ»، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ، ﻭﻟﻜﻦ اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﻮﺝ ﻛﻤﻮﺝ اﻟﺒﺤﺮ، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻳﺎ ﺃﻣﻴﺮ اﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻴﻦ، ﻻ ﺑﺄﺱ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ، ﺇﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻚ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻣﻐﻠﻘﺎ، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻳﻔﺘﺢ اﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﺴﺮ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻻ، ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﺴﺮ، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﺫاﻙ ﺃﺣﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻐﻠﻖ، ﻗﻠﻨﺎ: ﻋﻠﻢ ﻋﻤﺮ اﻟﺒﺎﺏ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻧﻌﻢ، ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﺪ اﻟﻠﻴﻠﺔ، ﺇﻧﻲ ﺣﺪﺛﺘﻪ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻷﻏﺎﻟﻴﻂ، ﻓﻬﺒﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺄﻟﻪ، ﻭﺃﻣﺮﻧﺎ ﻣﺴﺮﻭﻗﺎ ﻓﺴﺄﻟﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ: ﻣﻦ اﻟﺒﺎﺏ؟، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻋﻤﺮ __________ W3393 (3/1314) -[ ﺭ 502]

وذلك لتعلم أن المقصود بيموج أنها فتنة من نوع آخر، من أشد أنواع الفتنة والتي هي أشد من القتل فيبقى شرار الخلق يفتنون في بعضهم البعض

قال الله (وَحَرَ ٰ⁠مٌ عَلَىٰ قَرۡیَةٍ أَهۡلَكۡنَـٰهَاۤ أَنَّهُمۡ لَا یَرۡجِعُونَ (٩٥) حَتَّىٰۤ إِذَا فُتِحَتۡ یَأۡجُوجُ وَمَأۡجُوجُ وَهُم مِّن كُلِّ حَدَبࣲ یَنسِلُونَ (٩٦) وَٱقۡتَرَبَ ٱلۡوَعۡدُ ٱلۡحَقُّ فَإِذَا هِیَ شَـٰخِصَةٌ أَبۡصَـٰرُ ٱلَّذِینَ كَفَرُوا۟ یَـٰوَیۡلَنَا قَدۡ كُنَّا فِی غَفۡلَة  مِّنۡ هَـٰذَا بَلۡ كُنَّا ظَـٰلِمِینَ (٩٧)﴾ [الأنبياء ٩٥-٩٧] صدق الله العظيم

يَقُولُ تَعَالَى: ﴿وَحَرَامٌ عَلَى قَرْيَةٍ﴾ قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: وَجَبَ، يَعْنِي: قَدَرًا مُقَدرًا أَنَّ أَهْلَ كُلِّ قَرْيَةٍ أُهْلِكُوا أَنَّهُمْ لَا يُرْجَعُونَ إِلَى الدُّنْيَا قَبْلَ يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ. هَكَذَا صَرَّحَ بِهِ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ، وَأَبُو جَعْفَرٍ الْبَاقِرُ، وَقَتَادَةُ، وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ

وفي هذا بيان على بداية هلاك الكثير من القرى وﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻳﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻭﻣﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻣﻦ أشراط اﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ اﻟﺘﻲ ﺃﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﻬﺎ اﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﺪﻻﻟﺔ اﻵﻳﺘﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﺮاﻁ اﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ: ﺃﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ اﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺇﺫا ﻓﺘﺤﺖ ﻳﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻭﻣﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻗﺘﺮاﺏ اﻟﻮﻋﺪ اﻟﺤﻖ ﻭاﻟﻤﺮاﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻮﻡ اﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ

ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ (حَتَّىٰۤ إِذَا فُتِحَتۡ یَأۡجُوجُ وَمَأۡجُوجُ) [اﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء: 96] ﺣﺘﻰ ” ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ اﻵﻳﺔ، ﺃﻱ ﻛﻞ ﻗﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻫﻠﻜﺖ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻬﻼﻙ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ اﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ، ﺃﻭ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﻓﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ اﻟﺮﺟﻌﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ اﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ، ﺃﻭ ﺇﻟﻰ اﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ اﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ، ﻭﻫﺬﻩ اﻷﻗﻮاﻝ ﻣﻔﺮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ اﻵﻳﺔ اﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ( وَحَرَ ٰ⁠مٌ عَلَىٰ قَرۡیَةٍ أَهۡلَكۡنَـٰهَاۤ) [اﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء: 95]. ﻭﻗﻴﻞ: ﺇﻥ “ﺣﺘﻰ” ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎلى ( وَتَقَطَّعُوۤا۟ أَمۡرَهُم بَیۡنَهُمۡۖ كُلٌّ إِلَیۡنَا رَ ٰ⁠جِعُونَ) [اﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء: 93] ، ﺃﻱ اﺳﺘﻤﺮ اﻟﺨﻼﻑ ﺑﻴﻦ اﻷﻣﻢ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ اﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ فمن يستمر فله العذاب ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ( حَتَّىٰۤ إِذَا فُتِحَتۡ یَأۡجُوجُ وَمَأۡجُوجُ)[اﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء: 96]، اﻟﻤﺮاﺩ ﺇﺫا ﻓﺘﺢ اﻟﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﻴﻦ اﻟﻘﺒﻴﻠﺘﻴﻦ اﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺘﻴﻦ ﻭﺗﻤﻜﻨﻮا ﻣﻦ اﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ، ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺟﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺪﺏ ﻭﻫﻮ اﻟﻤﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﻦ اﻷﺭﺽ ﻳﺴﺮﻋﻮﻥ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻤﺸﻲ ﺇﻟﻰ اﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ. ﻭﺃﻣﺎ اﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻢ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺓ: ﻣﻨﻬﺎ: ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺃﻡ ﺣﺒﻴﺒﺔ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺿﻲ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ، ﻋﻦ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺟﺤﺶ ﺭﺿﻲ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ: (ﺃﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻓﺰﻋﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ: ” ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ اﻟﻠﻪ، ﻭﻳﻞ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮ ﻗﺪ اﻗﺘﺮﺏ، ﻓﺘﺢ اﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺩﻡ ﻳﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻭﻣﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ “، ﻭﺣﻠﻖ ﺑﺈﺻﺒﻌﻴﻪ اﻹﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻭاﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻠﻴﻬﺎ، ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺟﺤﺶ: ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺃﻓﻨﻬﻠﻚ ﻭﻓﻴﻨﺎ اﻟﺼﺎﻟﺤﻮﻥ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ: ” ﻧﻌﻢ، ﺇﺫا ﻛﺜﺮ اﻟﺨﺒﺚ ) ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻪ اﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﻪ: ﻛﺘﺎﺏ اﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء (6 / 381) ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ اﻟﻔﺘﻦ (13 / 106) ، ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﻪ: ﻛﺘﺎﺏ اﻟﻔﺘﻦ ﻭﺃﺷﺮاﻁ اﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ (4 / 2207). انتهى

وفي صحيح مسلم ، الجزء رقم :8، الصفحة رقم:196

2937 ( 110 )

ذَكَرَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ الدَّجَّالَ وفي ذَاتَ غَدَاةٍ، فَخَفَّضَ فِيهِ وَرَفَّعَ، حَتَّى ظَنَنَّاهُ فِي طَائِفَةِ النَّخْلِ …… وفي نهاية الحديث الطويل ذكر “إِذْ بَعَثَ اللَّهُ الْمَسِيحَ ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ، فَيَنْزِلُ عِنْدَ الْمَنَارَةِ الْبَيْضَاءِ شَرْقِيَّ دِمَشْقَ، بَيْنَ مَهْرُودَتَيْنِ ، وَاضِعًا كَفَّيْهِ عَلَى أَجْنِحَةِ مَلَكَيْنِ، إِذَا طَأْطَأَ رَأْسَهُ قَطَرَ، وَإِذَا رَفَعَهُ تَحَدَّرَ مِنْهُ جُمَانٌ كَاللُّؤْلُؤِ، فَلَا يَحِلُّ لِكَافِرٍ يَجِدُ رِيحَ نَفَسِهِ إِلَّا مَاتَ، وَنَفَسُهُ يَنْتَهِي حَيْثُ يَنْتَهِي طَرْفُهُ، فَيَطْلُبُهُ حَتَّى يُدْرِكَهُ بِبَابِ لُدٍّ فَيَقْتُلُهُ، ثُمَّ يَأْتِي عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ قَوْمٌ قَدْ عَصَمَهُمُ اللَّهُ مِنْهُ، فَيَمْسَحُ عَنْ وُجُوهِهِمْ، وَيُحَدِّثُهُمْ بِدَرَجَاتِهِمْ فِي الْجَنَّةِ، فَبَيْنَمَا هُوَ كَذَلِكَ، إِذْ أَوْحَى اللَّهُ إِلَى عِيسَى : إِنِّي قَدْ أَخْرَجْتُ عِبَادًا لِي، لَا يَدَانِ لِأَحَدٍ بِقِتَالِهِمْ، فَحَرِّزْ عِبَادِي إِلَى الطُّورِ. وَيَبْعَثُ اللَّهُ يَأْجُوجَ وَمَأْجُوجَ، { وَهُمْ مِنْ كُلِّ حَدَبٍ يَنْسِلُونَ } فَيَمُرُّ أَوَائِلُهُمْ عَلَى بُحَيْرَةِ طَبَرِيَّةَ، فَيَشْرَبُونَ مَا فِيهَا، وَيَمُرُّ آخِرُهُمْ فَيَقُولُونَ : لَقَدْ كَانَ بِهَذِهِ مَرَّةً مَاءٌ. وَيُحْصَرُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهِ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ، حَتَّى يَكُونَ رَأْسُ الثَّوْرِ لِأَحَدِهِمْ خَيْرًا مِنْ مِائَةِ دِينَارٍ لِأَحَدِكُمُ الْيَوْمَ، فَيَرْغَبُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهِ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ، فَيُرْسِلُ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِمُ النغف فِي رِقَابِهِمْ، فَيُصْبِحُونَ فَرْسَى كموت نَفْسٍ وَاحِدَةٍ، ثُمَّ يَهْبِطُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهِ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ إِلَى الْأَرْضِ، فَلَا يَجِدُونَ فِي الْأَرْضِ مَوْضِعَ شِبْرٍ إِلَّا مَلَأَهُ زهمهم وَنَتْنُهُمْ، فَيَرْغَبُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهِ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ، فَيُرْسِلُ اللَّهُ طَيْرًا كَأَعْنَاقِ الْبُخْتِ، فَتَحْمِلُهُمْ، فَتَطْرَحُهُمْ حَيْثُ شَاءَ اللَّهُ، ثُمَّ يُرْسِلُ اللَّهُ مَطَرًا لَا يَكُنُّ مِنْهُ بَيْتُ مَدَرٍ وَلَا وَبَرٍ، فَيَغْسِلُ الْأَرْضَ، حَتَّى يَتْرُكَهَا كَالزَّلَفَةِ ، ثُمَّ يُقَالُ لِلْأَرْضِ : أَنْبِتِي ثَمَرَتَكِ، وَرُدِّي بَرَكَتَكِ. فَيَوْمَئِذٍ تَأْكُلُ الْعِصَابَةُ مِنَ الرُّمَّانَةِ، وَيَسْتَظِلُّونَ بِقِحْفِهَا ، وَيُبَارَكُ فِي الرِّسْلِ ، حَتَّى إِنَّ اللِّقْحَةَ مِنَ الْإِبِلِ لَتَكْفِي الْفِئَامَمِنَ النَّاسِ، وَاللِّقْحَةَ مِنَ الْبَقَرِ لَتَكْفِي الْقَبِيلَةَ مِنَ النَّاسِ، وَاللِّقْحَةَ مِنَ الْغَنَمِ لَتَكْفِي الْفَخِذَ مِنَ النَّاسِ، فَبَيْنَمَا هُمْ كَذَلِكَ إِذْ بَعَثَ اللَّهُ رِيحًا طَيِّبَةً، فَتَأْخُذُهُمْ تَحْتَ آبَاطِهِمْ، فَتَقْبِضُ رُوحَ كُلِّ مُؤْمِنٍ وَكُلِّ مُسْلِمٍ، وَيَبْقَى شِرَارُ النَّاسِ،يَتَهَارَجُونَ فِيهَا تَهَارُجَ الْحُمُرِ، فَعَلَيْهِمْ تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ ” أنتهى

وبهذا نختصر بأن يأجوج ومأجوج يأتون بعد الدجال وهذا في وقت وجود سيدنا عيسى وعندها يبقى شرار الخلق فيقبض الله روح كل مؤمن ويبقى ماتبقى من قوم يأجوج ومأجوج وشرار الخلق وكل هذا ولم تأتي الساعة بعد بل تتحقق آخر الأشراط الى أن تقوم الساعة ويأتي الوعد الحق ويجمع الناس للمحشر

من هم يأجوج ومأجوج ؟

الجواب هم من نسل سيدنا آدم ولم يكونوا من أهل السماء ولا جراثيم ولا إشعاعات ولا جان كما قال أهل الخرافات

كَمَا ثَبَتَ فِي الصَّحِيحَيْنِ: “إِنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى يَقُولُ: يَا آدَمُ. فَيَقُولُ: لَبَّيْكَ وَسَعْدَيْكَ. فَيَقُولُ: ابْعَثْ بَعْثَ النَّارِ. فَيَقُولُ: وَمَا بَعْثُ النَّارِ؟ فَيَقُولُ: مِنْ كُلِّ أَلْفٍ تِسْعُمِائَةٌ وَتِسْعَةٌ وَتِسْعُونَ إِلَى النَّارِ، وَوَاحِدٌ إِلَى الْجَنَّةِ؟ فَحِينَئِذٍ يَشِيبُ الصَّغِيرُ، وَتَضَعُ كُلُّ ذَاتِ حَمْلٍ حَمْلَهَا، فَيُقَالُ: إِنَّ فِيكُمْ أُمَّتَيْنِ، مَا كَانَتَا فِي شَيْءٍ إِلَّا كَثَّرَتَاهُ: يَأْجُوجُ وَمَأْجُوجُ

وأختلف الناس في معنى يأجوج ومأجوج وقيل أن أصل اسمائهم أعجمية، ولكن القرآن عربي مبين فلذلك نقول أن اسمهما ﻋﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ، ﻭاﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻲ اﺷﺘﻘﺎﻗﻬﻤﺎ، ﻓﻘﻴﻞ: ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻴﺞ اﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻫﻮ اﻟﺘﻬﺎﺑﻬﺎ، ﻭﻗﻴﻞ: ﻣﻦ اﻷﺟﺎﺝ ﻭﻫﻮ اﻟﻤﺎء اﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ اﻟﻤﻠﻮﺣﺔ، ﻭﻗﻴﻞ: ﻣﻦ اﻷﺝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ اﻟﻌﺪﻭ، ﻭﻗﻴﻞ: ﻣﻦ اﻷﺟﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﻫﻲ اﻻﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﻭاﻻﺿﻄﺮاﺏ. ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ اﻟﻘﺮاء: ﻳﺎﺟﻮﺝ ﻭﻣﺎﺟﻮﺝ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻤﺰ. ﻭاﻟﺨﻼﺻﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬا: ﺃﻥ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻲ اﺷﺘﻘﺎﻗﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻟﺤﺎﻟﻬﻢ، ﻭﻳﺆﻳﺪ اﻻﺷﺘﻘﺎﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺝ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ( وَتَرَكۡنَا بَعۡضَهُمۡ یَوۡمَىِٕذࣲ یَمُوجُ فِی بَعۡض) [اﻟﻜﻬﻒ: 99] . ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﻦ ﻳﺨﺮﺟﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺴﺪ ﻭﻗﺪ اﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﻬﻢ، ﻓﻘﻴﻞ: ﺇﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﺭﻳﺔ ﺁﺩﻡ. ﻭاﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﺟﺤﻪ اﻟﺤﺎﻓﻆ اﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ – ﺭﺣﻤﻪ اﻟﻠﻪ – ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻗﺒﻴﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻟﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺚ ﺑﻦ ﻧﻮﺡ. ﻓﺘﺢ اﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ (13 / 106).ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻟﺪ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭﺣﻮاء، ﻭﻳﺆﻳﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ اﻟﺨﺪﺭﻱ ﺭﺿﻲ اﻟﻠﻪ

فورد في ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ في كتاب الإيمان


باب قوله يقول الله لآدم أخرج بعث النار من كل ألف تسعمائة وتسعة وتسعين

صفحة 201

379 – (222)

ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺷﻴﺒﺔ اﻟﻌﺒﺴﻲ، ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺮ، ﻋﻦ اﻷﻋﻤﺶ، ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ، ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ: ” ﻳﻘﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ: §ﻳﺎ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ: ﻟﺒﻴﻚ ﻭﺳﻌﺪﻳﻚ ﻭاﻟﺨﻴﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻳﺪﻳﻚ، ﻗﺎﻝ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ: ﺃﺧﺮﺝ ﺑﻌﺚ اﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺚ اﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻟﻒ ﺗﺴﻌﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻌﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻓﺬاﻙ ﺣﻴﻦ ﻳﺸﻴﺐ اﻟﺼﻐﻴﺮ ﻭﺗﻀﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺫاﺕ ﺣﻤﻞ ﺣﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺮﻯ اﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺳﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﺬاﺏ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ” ﻗﺎﻝ: ﻓﺎﺷﺘﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﻮا: ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ اﻟﺮﺟﻞ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ: «ﺃﺑﺸﺮﻭا ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻭﻣﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﺃﻟﻔﺎ، ﻭﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺭﺟﻞ» ﻗﺎﻝ: ﺛﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ: «ﻭاﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ، ﺇﻧﻲ ﻷﻃﻤﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮا ﺭﺑﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ اﻟﺠﻨﺔ» ﻓﺤﻤﺪﻧﺎ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﻛﺒﺮﻧﺎ. ﺛﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ: «ﻭاﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ، ﺇﻧﻲ ﻷﻃﻤﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮا ﺛﻠﺚ ﺃﻫﻞ اﻟﺠﻨﺔ» ﻓﺤﻤﺪﻧﺎ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﻛﺒﺮﻧﺎ. ﺛﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ: «ﻭاﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ، ﺇﻧﻲ ﻷﻃﻤﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮا ﺷﻄﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ اﻟﺠﻨﺔ، ﺇﻥ ﻣﺜﻠﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻷﻣﻢ ﻛﻤﺜﻞ اﻟﺸﻌﺮﺓ اﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎء ﻓﻲ ﺟﻠﺪ اﻟﺜﻮﺭ اﻷﺳﻮﺩ، ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻟﺮﻗﻤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺫﺭاﻉ اﻟﺤﻤﺎﺭ» __________ S [ ﺷ (ﺑﻌﺚ اﻟﻨﺎﺭ) اﻟﺒﻌﺚ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﻤﻌﻨﻰ اﻟﻤﺒﻌﻮﺙ اﻟﻤﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻴﺰ ﺃﻫﻞ اﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻴﺮﻫﻢ (ﻳﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻭﻣﺄﺟﻮﺝ) ﻫﻤﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻬﻤﻮﺯﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ اﻟﻘﺮاء ﻭﺃﻫﻞ اﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﻗﺮﺃ ﻋﺎﺻﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻬﻤﺰ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻴﺞ اﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺻﻮﺗﻬﺎ ﻭﺷﺮﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﺒﻬﻮا ﺑﻪ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺗﻬﻢ ﻭﺷﺪﺗﻬﻢ ﻭاﺿﻄﺮاﺑﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ (ﻛﺎﻟﺮﻗﻤﺔ) ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ اﻟﻠﻐﺔ اﻟﺮﻗﻤﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺤﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ اﻷﺛﺮاﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﻋﻀﺪﻳﻪ ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﻫﻲ اﻟﺪاﺋﺮﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺫﺭاﻋﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﻫﻲ اﻟﻬﻨﺔ اﻟﻨﺎﺗﺌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺫﺭاﻉ اﻟﺪاﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩاﺧﻞ] انتهى

ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ

52 كتاب الفتن وأشراط الساعة

27 باب قرب الساعة

صفحة -2268

131 – (2949)

ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺯﻫﻴﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺮﺏ، ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ اﺑﻦ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ، ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ، ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ اﻷﻗﻤﺮ، ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻲ اﻷﺣﻮﺹ، ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻠﻪ، ﻋﻦ اﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ، ﻗﺎﻝ: «§ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ اﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ، ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮاﺭ اﻟﻨﺎﺱ» انتهى

ﺻﺤﻴﺢ اﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ

61 كتاب المناقب

باب علامات النبوة في الإسلام

صفحة -198


ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ اﻟﻴﻤﺎﻥ، ﺃﺧﺒﺮﻧﺎ ﺷﻌﻴﺐ، ﻋﻦ اﻟﺰﻫﺮﻱ، ﻗﺎﻝ: ﺣﺪﺛﻨﻲ ﻋﺮﻭﺓ ﺑﻦ اﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ، ﺃﻥ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ، ﺣﺪﺛﺘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻡ ﺣﺒﻴﺒﺔ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺪﺛﺘﻬﺎ، ﻋﻦ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺟﺤﺶ، ﺃﻥ اﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ، ﺩﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺰﻋﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ: «ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ اﻟﻠﻪ، §ﻭﻳﻞ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮ ﻗﺪ اﻗﺘﺮﺏ، ﻓﺘﺢ اﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺩﻡ ﻳﺄﺟﻮﺝ، ﻭﻣﺄﺟﻮﺝ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬا، ﻭﺣﻠﻖ ﺑﺈﺻﺒﻌﻪ، ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻠﻴﻬﺎ» ﻓﻘﺎﻟﺖ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ اﻟﻠﻪ ﺃﻧﻬﻠﻚ ﻭﻓﻴﻨﺎ اﻟﺼﺎﻟﺤﻮﻥ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ: «ﻧﻌﻢ ﺇﺫا ﻛﺜﺮ اﻟﺨﺒﺚ» __________ W3403 (3/1317) -[ ﺭ 3168]

الأرض ثابته

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم والصلاة والسلام على سيد الخلق والمرسلين

قال الله ( ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِی جَعَلَ لَكُمُ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ قَرَارࣰا وَٱلسَّمَاۤءَ بِنَاۤءࣰ وَصَوَّرَكُمۡ فَأَحۡسَنَ صُوَرَكُمۡ وَرَزَقَكُم مِّنَ ٱلطَّیِّبَـٰتِۚ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكُمُ ٱللَّهُ رَبُّكُمۡۖ فَتَبَارَكَ ٱللَّهُ رَبُّ ٱلۡعَـٰلَمِینَ) صدق الله العظيم

فالسماء بناء ( وَٱلسَّمَاۤءِ ذَاتِ ٱلۡحُبُكِ)، فهي محكمة ومبنية مشيدة ذات طرق تشبه الجهاز العصبي وهي ذات طباق كما في الأرض مثلهن ( بساطا)، أما الأرض في قرار أي مستقره وصالحة للعيش وهي فضل من الله وهذا من أحد الأرزاق التي وجب شكرها لله ليل ونهار وقد قال أغلب المفسرين أن القرار هنا أيضاً يقصد به ثبات الأرض وسكونها وعدم حركتها

ولكن ماذا كان رد الإنسان على هذا الفضل؟ قال أن الأرض متحركة وليست قرار بل مضربة ورد أهل التفسير بقول سبحان الله ساكنه وثابته أي لانشعر بحركتها، الله قال انها قرار والإنسان يقول ان قرار تعني أنها متحركة ولكن لانشعر بحركتها فسبحان الله. بل قال أن لها حركتين حركة حول نفسها وحركة حول الشمس فلا تشكر الله على باطل وتقول على هذا سبحان الله ثم تدخل في دائرة من ينطبق عليهم قوله تعالى ( ٱلَّذِینَ ضَلَّ سَعۡیُهُمۡ فِی ٱلۡحَیَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡیَا وَهُمۡ یَحۡسَبُونَ أَنَّهُمۡ یُحۡسِنُونَ صُنۡعًا) صدق الله العظيم

تعتقد أن الموضوع علمي ولكن قال الله ( ۞ مَّاۤ أَشۡهَدتُّهُمۡ خَلۡقَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَلَا خَلۡقَ أَنفُسِهِمۡ وَمَا كُنتُ مُتَّخِذَ ٱلۡمُضِلِّینَ عَضُدا) ، فالموضوع هو الإيمان بما لاتدركه العقول ولا الأبصار وبكلام الله ولعلها فتنه ليعلم الله الذين صدّقوا بكل ماهو موجود في كلام الله ومن الذين كذبوا ببعضه ( أَفَتُؤۡمِنُونَ بِبَعۡضِ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ وَتَكۡفُرُونَ بِبَعۡض)، فلا تكن مثل أهل الكتاب لأن الرسول قال أنه سنصبح مثلهم فأحذر

الله مسك السماء والأرض وثبتهما فهم لايتحركان ويتحرك ماهو بداخلهما من كواكب ونجوم وشمس وقمر وليل ونهار فقال الله  ( إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ یُمۡسِكُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ أَن تَزُولَاۚ وَلَىِٕن زَالَتَاۤ إِنۡ أَمۡسَكَهُمَا مِنۡ أَحَد مِّنۢ بَعۡدِهِۦۤۚ إِنَّهُۥ كَانَ حَلِیمًا غَفُورࣰا) صدق الله العظيم

هل يوجد بيان أقوى من هذا على أن الأرض ثابته؟ بل وتستطيع التحقق من معنى يمسك السموات والأرض في كتب التفسير لترى أنها تتحدث عن الثبات وعدم الإضطراب. مانفعله في كتابتنا هو التفكر في كلام الله وتدبره وليس تفسيره بالإضافة عليه فأحذر من أي تفسير يضيف فمثلاً قال الله ( سطحت)، وقال البشر سطحت يعني كره مسطوحة. الله قادر أن يقول انها كره مسطوحة. هل قالها؟ لاتنسى قوله تعالى ( وَتَمَّتۡ كَلِمَتُ رَبِّكَ صِدۡقا وَعَدۡلࣰاۚ لَّا مُبَدِّلَ لِكَلِمَـٰتِهِۦۚ وَهُوَ ٱلسَّمِیعُ ٱلۡعَلِیمُ) صدق الله العظيم

قال الله ( أَمَّن جَعَلَ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ قَرَارࣰا وَجَعَلَ خِلَـٰلَهَاۤ أَنۡهَـٰرࣰا وَجَعَلَ لَهَا رَوَ ٰ⁠سِیَ وَجَعَلَ بَیۡنَ ٱلۡبَحۡرَیۡنِ حَاجِزًاۗ أَءِلَـٰه مَّعَ ٱللَّهِۚ بَلۡ أَكۡثَرُهُمۡ لَا یَعۡلَمُونَ) صدق الله العظيم

والقَرارُ: مَصْدَرُ قَرَّ، إذا ثَبَتَ وسَكَنَ. ووَصَفَ الأرْضَ بِهِ لِلْمُغالَبَةِ، أيْ ذاتُ قَرارٍ. والمَعْنى جَعَلَ الأرْضَ ثابِتَةً قارَّةً غَيْرَ مُضْطَرِبَةٍ

فثبت الله هذه الأرض برواسي شامخات، ثبتها بأوتاد كما تثبت الخيمة في الصحراء فقال الله ( وَٱلۡجِبَالَ أَوۡتَادࣰا)، ونرى هذى ظاهراً في نموذج أهل الكتاب الأصلي للأرض المسطحة فترى من الأسفل أوتاد الجبال الرواسي

رواسي من راسي أي مستقر، ورواسي أي هي ماتجعل الشيء التي هي عليه راسي ( وَأَلۡقَىٰ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ رَوَ ٰ⁠سِیَ أَن تَمِیدَ بِكُمۡ وَأَنۡهَـٰرࣰا وَسُبُلࣰا لَّعَلَّكُمۡ تَهۡتَدُونَ)، والمَيْدُ: الِاضْطِرابُ، وضَمِيرُ (تَمِيدَ) عائِدٌ إلى الأرْضِ بِقَرِينَةِ قَرْنِهِ بِقَوْلِهِ تَعالى بِكم؛ لِأنَّ المَيْدَ إذا عُدِّيَ بِالباءِ عُلِمَ أنَّ المَجْرُورَ بِالباءِ هو الشَّيْءُ المُسْتَقِرُّ في الظَّرْفِ المائِدِ، والِاضْطِرابُ يُعَطِّلُ مَصالِحَ النّاسِ ويُلْحِقُ بِهِمْ آلامًا


قال الله ( وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ مَدَدۡنَـٰهَا وَأَلۡقَیۡنَا فِیهَا رَوَ ٰ⁠سِیَ وَأَنۢبَتۡنَا فِیهَا مِن كُلِّ شَیۡءࣲ مَّوۡزُونࣲ (١٩) وَجَعَلۡنَا لَكُمۡ فِیهَا مَعَـٰیِشَ وَمَن لَّسۡتُمۡ لَهُۥ بِرَ ٰ⁠زِقِینَ (٢٠)﴾ [الحجر ١٩-٢٠] صدق الله العظيم

قال القرطبي وكذلك عن إبن عباس في تفسيرهم لهذه الآية

قَوْلُهُ تَعَالَى: ﴿وَالْأَرْضَ مَدَدْناها﴾ هَذَا مِنْ نِعَمِهِ أَيْضًا، وَمِمَّا يَدُلُّ عَلَى كَمَالِ قُدْرَتِهِ. قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: بَسَطْنَاهَا عَلَى وَجْهِ الْمَاءِ، كَمَا قَالَ” وَالْأَرْضَ بَعْدَ ذلِكَ دَحاها “أي بَسَطَهَا. وَقَالَ:” وَالْأَرْضَ فَرَشْناها فَنِعْمَ الْماهِدُونَ “. وَهُوَ يَرُدُّ عَلَى مَنْ زَعَمَ أَنَّهَا كَالْكُرَةِ. وقوله تعالى (وَأَلْقَيْنا فِيها رَواسِيَ) جِبَالًا ثَابِتَةً لِئَلَّا تَتَحَرَّكَ بِأَهْلِهَا

ويبقى قوله تعالى ( وَجَعَلَ بَیۡنَ ٱلۡبَحۡرَیۡنِ حَاجِزًاۗ)، على نموذج الأرض المسطحة يصبح معرفة معنى هذه الآية ممكن وبسيط. فالأرض الأولى مدحوه كالوعاء حملت فيها الماء وكل ماهو موجود على الأرض الأولى من بحار ماهو الا بحر واحد ولاكن أكثر الناس لايعلمون. الله قال في هذه الآية أن أكثر الناس لايعلمون بكل هذا ( أَمَّن جَعَلَ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ قَرَارࣰا وَجَعَلَ خِلَـٰلَهَاۤ أَنۡهَـٰرࣰا وَجَعَلَ لَهَا رَوَ ٰ⁠سِیَ وَجَعَلَ بَیۡنَ ٱلۡبَحۡرَیۡنِ حَاجِزًاۗ أَءِلَـٰهࣱ مَّعَ ٱللَّهِۚ بَلۡ أَكۡثَرُهُمۡ لَا یَعۡلَمُونَ) صدق الله العظيم


فالحاجز هو الجدار الموجود في المنطقة المتجمدة والتي تفصل بين الأرض الأولى وبحرها وبين الأرض الثانية وبحرها فيعطينا الله المفاتيح للإبتداء بالعلم الصحيح ولكننا أتبعنا علم من لاعلم له في هذا. لاننكر أن البشر متقدمين في الكثير من العلوم مثلاً الهندسة وغيرها ولكن علم الفلك وغيره مما فيه من الغيبيات يعتبر علم غير صحيح وإن صح بعضه





Banning Flat earth content

In the case of banning flat earth content, note that this decision contradicts with the freedom of speech a brings many questions and doubts about the intentions.


What’s in the media is not like what’s in the reports and documentations. The government knows this by heart and if they are responsible for this decision, wisely they should pull it back, or if it’s a decision through the tech companies, the government should command them to pull back.


THIS IS A LOSING CASE FOR THOSE WHO BANNED FLAT EARTH CONTENT. IMAGINE THIS GOES TO COURT? Not because flat erathers are right, it’s because the law is clear.


Plus, many government documentations prove that there are questions about the shape of the earth.


We do share YouTube videos about flat earth. We had (my group) almost 10 YouTube channels. Two of them were blocked last year. We do not offend anyone but we do the correct interpretation of what’s in the Quran and the Bible.


As the shape of earth, skies and the heavens were described clearly in the holy books, with no contradictions whatsoever, there must be a reason that they are mentioned there right? And that is to believe in God’s words.

Albert Einstein Quotes About Religion and Science

Atheists and rigid scientists say that the separation between science and religion is must as religion is not a science book. Well, this is a new conclusion to mankind has no roots. God, the one who created earth, and created the humans, is the only one capable of describing the things we can’t understand such as the creation of 7 earths and the 7 skies. Accept our apology if we say that this separation is ignorance.


We also talk about the Flat Earth that came from the Hebrew translations too.



what a firmament is? It is not the air. Perhaps the celestial sphere, the empyrean, the welkin. It’s this ball that made you think earth is a ball, but put in mind that the meaning includes the land, water and air of the earth and this makes the ball.



However, the Bible states clearly the edges story and “the spread out” which is an incorrect translation. You can find this same translation in the English version of the Quran. Muslim scholars did copy this same incorrect definition of the earth, and interpreted it for the Quran somehow. Those were new age scholars who had this opinion and left the direct exact words of God.

so what brought the concept of Heliocentrism to the world except the ritual of solar deity?


And why can’t we accept that people make mistakes and not every theory is correct?




And here are some links that explain this

The Bible 1

All the holy books

The Bible 2


If you block videos that talk about religious beliefs that don’t harm, we will consider this as an insult to religion and a block of the truth. WITH THIS, YOU ARE PREVENTING PEOPLE FROM PRACTICING RELIGION, AND STOPPING THEM TO SPREAD THEIR BELIEFS.



We study the law carefully unlike the acts of ban appearing lately. Proton mail which is an encrypted mail service by CERN, are aware of better laws of the internet that Google and Facebook don’t. Their system is connected to a certain court which will limit the capabilities of the end user to claim against them. YouTube and Facebook don’t have that and there is a massive number of flatearthers who can claim claim against the ban in different courts from different areas of the world. So, the challenge for you is: can you stop the truth from spreading ?





Twinkle Twinkle

Twinkle, twinkle little star. How I wonder what you are? Don’t Grow up, it’s a trap. Within a younger brain, clear thoughts can shine to release a new knowledge to the world, always open to unleash the true basic understanding of life. When the brain approach knowledge through the law of God of simplicity, a light becomes the way. No poisonous ideas until school arrives which may inject human knowledge of destruction. So be the school of your children, let them teach their teachers and friends in school. Let them treat their school as a lounge to socialize and play. Not more. So don’t let anyone kill your dreams by telling you that stars do die and suck whatever around them. That is an idiot science fiction movie that lead everyone to become dumb

The space invaders and the future of text

The relationship between technology and place can be a key concept that perhaps will assist to conduct a successful investigation leading to invent better technologies.  As Marshal Mucluhan referred to technology as it is an extinction of the body and the mind, arguing that television consumption led to transform our perceptual systems and thinking (1994), many digital thinkers believed that Mcluhan’s concept of perception applies to the digital technologies of today (Bolteret al.2013). However, the complex characteristics of the emerging technologies, and their rapid growth, may require further serious research and experimentations in the field of media understanding and aesthetics. As a result of the new identities in the features within modern day technologies,  Bolter, Engberg and Maclntyre argued that media aesthetics are not singular as Macluhan suggested, this is because users are not passive anymore (2013). Far apart from the relationship between the television and their audiences, today’s technologies rely on the participation of the individual to create, design, and share the environment (Bolteret al.2013). This feedback circle that the users experience emphasizes on the the importance of redefining our understanding  of how we perceive our environment through technology (Bolteret al.2013). Thus, creating the technologies of tomorrow requires a clear understanding of the effects of modern day technologies, and how they are designed and for what purpose. A great question that may arise is about the level of participation of the individual in the creation and design of the environment through technology. One gateway to understand technologies is to consider the study of place. Before this study introduces place. Place can be computational or natural (Harrison and Dourish 1996). In this study, I will argue that the technology that incorporates the use of natural place is a key to provide a better safe life for our future generation.

Important concepts and movements have emphasized that the physical space is a source of disturbance and it is senseless. The ideas that ensured that reality should be vague and hidden within our output through a selection of information from the past (Manovich 2002, Smith 2003, SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009, Armitage 2015, Kozíket al.2015). This is to discuss postmodernism and what relates to it. Postmodernism served well in the account of philosophy, literature, film, and arts (SHEEHAN and 2004). Perhaps, it also supported the growth of both fields of the interactive arts and net arts (Manovich 2002, Lim and Yoo 2014). This includes the studies that confirmed the connection between new media and postmodernism (Rohle 2005). However, I believe that the relationship between new media and postmodernism should be different. To understand postmodernism, it is crucial to investigate modernity, a movement that died but its roots maintained. Modernity is the “modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence. This associates modernity with a time period and with an initial geographical location, but for the moment leaves its major characteristics safely stowed away in a black box” (Giddens 1967, p.1). Anthony Giddens, in his book the consequences of modernity, emphasized that one of the features of modernity is the separation between time and space (1967). Indeed, this leads to the expansion of knowledge and information, but also weakens our perception of understanding science (Giddens 1967). Similarly, postmodernism is a movement of arts that has been evolved over the years. “Post-modernism, if it means anything, is best kept to refer to styles or movements within literature, painting, the plastic arts, and architecture. It concerns aspects of aesthetic reflection upon the nature of modernity” (Giddens 1967, p.45).  A vast number of studies have included that postmodernism should be replaced, already has been replaced, or it just needs enhancements (SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009).  For example, the works of  Alan Kirby illustrated how new technologies replaced postmodernism in to what is called digimodernism, which reconfigured our culture (Kirby 2009). Some studies indicated that the movement reached its strength between the 1970s and 1980s, and started to slow down in the 1990s (SHEEHAN and 2004). However, the influence of postmodernism remained clear in the works of many recent new media studies such as (Rohle 2005, Manovich 2013). Let me paraphrase my argument to make it clear, I am arguing that the new media should not only aim to teach us how to have certain visual skills, but also we should learn from it how to build things. Familiarizing the physical space. New media is not only for relocating icons and symbols on the computer screen. This new pattern requires a different kind of knowledge. A knowledge that equals the visual space with reality. The question is: How can children learn the real science through modern day technologies ? Thus, the heart of this argument relies on understanding the importance of the natural place, nature, or reality in our visualization of computer imagery.

Lee Manovich in his book the language of new media, convincingly explained the intimate relationship between the software operations and postmodernism (2002). Stated “the practice of putting together a media object from already existing and commercially distributed media elements already existed with old media, but new media technology further standardizes it and makes it much easier to perform. What before involved scissors and glue now involves simply clicking on cut and paste. And, by encoding the operations of selection and combination into the very interfaces of authoring and editing software, new media legitimizes them. Pulling elements from databases and libraries becomes the default; creating them from scratch becomes an exception” (Manovich 2002, p.130). Also, “It is not accidental that the development of GUI which legitimized “cut and paste” logic as well as media manipulation software such as Photoshop, which popularized plug-in architecture, took place during the 1980s — the same decade when contemporary culture became post-modern.” (Manovich 2002, p.130).  From Manovich’s book, Fredric Jameson  stated “Rather than assembling more media recordings of reality, culture is now busy re-working, recombining and analyzing the already accumulated media material” (2002, p.131). This supports the concept of Manovich in which that the software “made postmodernism possible” (2002, p.131). Furthermore, in the brilliant work of Dziga Vertov, in the definition of modernization, the physical space was expressed  as a source of disruption (Manovich 2002). The ability to simulate old media in a computer, that later can be easily shared over networks, that what Manovich was discussing, considered the computer as a metamedium that enables other software mediums to take commands, and combine various media forms in one place, which form the concept of software hybridization (2013). The ideas of Manovich serve well in seeking the answer to the question of the level of the individual participation in the design and the creation of the environment. However, Manovich is a new media artist, designer, animator, programmer, and a film theorist (2002). Thus, the spirit of his works is based on his perception of the software environment, and arts. If there is a discussion about place in Manovich’s books, it is from a computational point of view such as his discussion about the GIS systems. The idea is that the software is taking the command in which software becomes a replacement of a large array of ancient physical, mechanical, and electronic technologies to create  new interfaces that interact with cultural artefacts (Manovich 2013). Monovich considered the hardware as a support that enhances our creations in the virtual space (Manovich 2013). For example, the mouse, the keyboard, or even the laptop are just tools to assist us in working in the virtual interface. Indeed the software is taking command, but an interesting question that I may seek to answer, what is the role of the hardware environment in the rapid revolution of the science of artificial intelligence, and materiality interactions? As it is already evolving. “The cost and complexity of hardware-centric systems can often be reduced by using software to perform tasks which don’t appear on the critical path. Alternately, the performance of software can sometimes be improved by using special purpose hardware to implement tasks which do appear on the critical path. Whatever the motivation, most modern systems are composed of both hardware and software components. Given the importance of the connection between hardware and software in these systems, it is surprising how little automated and machine-checkable support there is for co-design space exploration” (Kinget al.2015, p.1). The study aimed to limit the gap between hardware and software to enable the developers to create rapid systems (Kinget al.2015).  There are different possibilities on the consequences of the next generation hardware development. In some areas where solar energy takes place, the nature is the source that makes a system work, rather than electricity. MIT professor Vladimir Bulović, researched the numerous opportunities in the developments of nanotechnology and solar energy that may rise the technology into a whole new level (MOCHARI 2015). What I am trying to reach here is that there will be a time where   humans will be able to learn, design, create arts, and construct in a different way using hardware technologies and other physical devices. As an initial point, the semiotic language within a computer screen, should find a good start to live outside the digital box, or the computer. For example, the hologram of no goggles and peripherals.

Indeed, postmodernism is important. The positive value of pluralism is clear. Through the important role of “radical pluralism in democracy, tolerance and diversity”, it supported the practice of the “freedom of expression” (Kozíket al.2015, p.119). The way that postmodernism symbolically represents the world have opened the gates into a new kind of knowledge (Kozíket al.2015). The question is: will this kind of knowledge survive with the future technologies? will it survive the new evolution of mankind?   The best definition that explains the use of postmodernism in the computer might be: “that condition in which for the first time, and as a result of technologies that allow large-scale storage, access, and reproduction of records of the past, the past appears to be included in the present, or at the present’s disposal, and in which the ratio between present and past has therefore changed” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.10). Postmodernism is the base that formed the arts and literature of today (Giddens 1967, SHEEHAN and 2004).The trustful manipulation in the artefacts is what made this argument possible. According to  Manovich, the cut and paste is indeed related to postmodernism (Manovich 2002, p.131). The cut and the paste are the reasons of how I quoted Manovich extensively to argue that machines should connect to reality. It is the cut and paste that made me a computer programmer. In my masters at California Sate University East Bay, me and my partner Jeff Stott have created an interactive multimedia installation that uses the human brain to generate audiovisual content. Part of my duties was to design a patch in Max Msp to use it as a processing hub to connect all the sensors to the physical interface that we have designed. In this stage, I confirm that my study of computer science, and my few experiences in computer programming did not serve well. However, I was confident as the nature in the “automation” of new media, enables the user to become a co-author (Manovich 2002). Using the Max tutorials, manuals, and code examples – provided a complete source for constructing a Max patch. As well the user generated patches that are available on the web. Thus, this little previous knowledge in computer programming, with understanding the interactive culture and the internet, and of course the cut and paste, is what made the job done by the end of the day. Thus, we can confirm that manipulation plays a major role in the world of postmodernism.

However, manipulation is great but not in every context. The literature is trustful. This dose not mean that manipulation in real life, or in the computer is always a positive thing. In fact, when some one claims that another person manipulated him, this mainly understood as a negative situation. This kind of manipulation implies negativity, and   needs explanation to change its meaning. This is the case when the murderer commits his crime, and his lawyer makes him innocent in the eyes of the judges. In terms of computers, it is true that the internet resulted to improve the intellectual work, opportunities, and cultural change, but perhaps the artificial environment of the internet is problematic (Kozíket al.2015). Problems such as allowing the inability to distinguish between reality and virtually (Kozíket al.2015). As a consequence, it became the gateway to identity manipulation. As a result of anonymity, the internet became a great opportunity for cyber crimes with all of its kinds (Glaseret al.2002). As mentioning the benefits of the cut and paste, It is also worth to mention that it is a major contributor in the world of plagiarism. Alastair Pennycook, in his publication: “Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism” under the subject “Postmodern Uncertainty: The Death of the Author” he stated : “the notion of the author and individual creativity, and this argument that meanings are in a sense in circulation, that language is constantly cycled and recycled, raise profound questions about how we consider the notion of textual borrowing or plagiarism” (Pennycook 1996, p.211). Or in other words, postmodernism made plagiarism simple. As a result, the internet of today plays a major cause in increasing plagiarism (Howard 2007). As the conclusion of understanding how the relationship between computer texts and reality, a suggestion to avoid plagiarism is that computer texts should be more clever and connect more to reality by shifting its properties. As text should have the ability to recognise the users by the computer cameras and incorporate an automation of a plagiarism system that auto detects and auto blocks. The detection in real time by connecting the text to the physical space, or to reality is a clear suggestion. This is not an invasion of privacy. The ultimate invasion is caused by the advance in the information technology and specifically over the internet (A¨ımeur and Sch˝onfeld 2011).

This argument is all about proving that the physical space, nature, and reality will have an added value to the improvement of  new media. Thus, the aim in this argument is to trace the reasons of the exclusion of reality and space, and to prove their added value in our creation.  Paul Virilio’s views are concerned with the interaction of the human consequences with the disturbance of the physical space (Armitage 2015). Paul Virilio was a prisoner of war, and his theories basically were an escape from reality (Armitage 2015). “Virilio is the last endist, recuperating the most abiding concern of philosophical postmodernism, even as he shows its ominous determinations and potentially hazardous consequences for life in the twenty-first century (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.38). The problem in excluding the nature in the way we collect our information may result in accruing generalized knowledge only (Giddens 1967). The consequence of polarity is that it changed the ratio between the past and the present, which almost they become the same (SHEEHAN and 2004). Which made “The present of postmodernism has come to seem like a stalled present, an agitated but idle meanwhile” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.11). “The post-modern outlook sees a plurality of heterogeneous claims to knowledge, in which science does not have a privileged place” (Giddens 1967, p.2).  “The modern mind assumed that it knew more than its predecessors because the natural and historical science were flooding it with new knowledge about nature and history, the postmodern mind argues (paradoxically) that it knows more than others did because it has discovered how little the human mind can know” (Smith 2003, p.loc 108). “If modern physics showed us a world at odds with our senses, postmodern physics is showing us one which is at odds with our imagination, where imagination is taken as imagery” (Smith 2003, p.loc 231).This explains the death of the philosophy  of the metaphysics (Smith 2003). “Leonardo da Vinci is symbolic. His anatomical studies and drawings in general disclose a direction of interest that has turned eye into camera, in his case an extraordinary camera that could stop the hawk in flight and fix the rearing steed. Once again humankind was attending to nature’s details as a potential messenger of meaning” (Smith 2003, p.loc 207).

The existence of the technology of today is a result of the great inventions from the western culture. The western inventions are the reason behind making the algorithms of Mohammed Al Khawarzmi alive. Dennis Ritchie the inventor of the C programming language, Seymour Papert the inventor of the logo language and the mechanical turtle, David Liddle the lead developer of the star system, Bill gates and his windows, Tim Berners Lee, the creator of the world wide web and the founder of the w3schools and so on. These inventions have shaped our lives. However, it is crucial for this context to mention those who think beyond nature. The different ways of thinking of Newton, Einstein, And Hawking is what led to their discoveries. It’s simply thinking about time and space from a different perspective (Hawking 1988, Lorentz 2014). In Google’s Zeitgeist conference, Hawking stated “Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics” and declared that philosophers and their arts are dead (Warman 2011). With this, we showed both extreme perspectives, the ones that support the arts, and the other that support science. I believe a middle ground will lead to a better future. Somewhere in the middle where this fusion collides to build a generation that understands the arts and science at the same time, forming a new identity of the individual. This will not be achieved by learning in schools, it should be gained from our daily technology consumption. Thus, Technology should behave differently. A question that may arise: Applied science and engineering schools do exist. Therefore, what is the reason of arguing about postmodernism? The answer is because the aim here is to build a medium that enable the next generation to learn arts and science from every day life. A life long learning game or a device for example.  A product of a new new media technology that incorporates text, images and sound . A new media that has a different identity that respects the arts and science. I believe, postmodernism is  a great symbol of arts and literature, and thus, it should not be excluded, but not giving it too much of attention because science, as Hawking believes is the future. Furthermore, I believe science with no meaning is simply worthless. Science should be hidden within our digital interfaces, and not any interface, an interface that combines reality with imagination. The previous studies that discussed the problems in the inability to distinguish between reality and imagination, this inability can be unitized for a positive cause. A generation that is in control of their magic circle.There is so much to discover in nature, and if we only keep remixing the past, we might not be able to follow up with the future technologies. One of the attributes that makes a technology emerging is the uncertainty and ambiguity (Rotoloet al.2015). Then, this defines the interest of the artist in the technology.  According to the postmodernism thoughts, humans are able to learn through imagination. Learning of course will be achieved but to a certain extent. A future artist should be able to design his/her interactive art installation with the deeper understanding of  physics, dynamics, and programming codes of his/her creation. Thus, the suggestion is a fusion of balanced science and arts in an interesting way. Which provides a true situated meaning to a clear scientific knowledge.  Can  games do this?

VR, obesity, and disability

When  VR technologies  become available at every home, for every individual, indeed there will be a noticeable downside. For  those who are promoting it,  know they are also selling few lies to convince the public that VR is safe. Few have given the early warnings regarding time consumption telling that the use should not exceed  20 min a day.  Research studies indicated that the overuse  of the VR games can cause different disorders and panic attacks. The VR consumption is a gateway for less knowledge, and more disorders.

The effect of VR can be inspired from the movie WALL-E. Indeed the movie explains how the life style of our youth might become of we surrender to all the technologies around us. Obesity and narrowed minds!


When the GUI functionality is separated from the original platform structure, from the computer and launched through peripherals that are only 2.5 inches away from our eyes such as the VR googles, they make what is called a ‘fake reality’ real. The 2.5 inch distant will become the new alignment of the dimensions that we see in real life.  Indeed, futuristic technology may exclude the GUI and rely on physical features only and some holographic technologies. We must understand that the minds of today are far away from the minds of tomorrow. The minds of tomorrow will need technologies that enhance the motor skills more than anything else.  Definitely it’s a different kind of motor skills, not the ones we gain while VR- ing. This is not to say that VR is not fun. Indeed it is and in some cases it may produce a greater out come. For example, the use of VR for  strokes and other illnesses, but not for the mass to become ready for abuse.


If we are able to differentiate between space and place, you may invent technologies for the future. If we don’t, more technologies like VR to come. Tuan (1975) said place is this part that adds to space true meanings and cultural understanding built by the experience of the individual.  Dourish (2006) said that space is something we can only encounter after words. “Space is freedom and possibility, place is comfort and security” Bob Henderson (2001). Tuan ( 1975) proved to the world that natural place is a major contributor to gain systematic knowledge, only through the real world. Aldo Leopold, you should know this man, feared that ” education and culture have become synonymous with landlessness. So, the more artificial is you your environment, the more it is controlled to limit your knowledge and cause you disorders. Lets make technologies as they serve as the new play grounds that we use to know in the past, or lets enhance  our play grounds with technologies that may attract the youth.