The unfair censorship of the weak

Social media is the true extinction of our minds theses days. As Marshal McLuhan states “technology is an extension of the body and the mind”. People think that the more we advance in time, the more we witness great development. The truth is that we only go backwards and generate generations of Minions. This is the ultimate goal for most governments, where inventions are  not allowed and learning is based  on governments demands. Based on the Facebook Community Standards, it supports equality and prevents hate speeches. Also, Facebook ensures that the users data are in safe hands. It is proven over the years that Facebook do nothing but to invade your privacy without you knowing.

3B90FEED-958C-4EB0-8B9F-9FFDAD07FDEE

What’s on their policy agreement is not what happens in reality. Not to mention how the agreement is tweaked and perfectly made to make you feel secure. I am writing this article today as I have experienced an unfair judgment by Facebook, which made me include a different opinion in regards the religious views within the Facebook community standards. 

IMG_4620

Various studies investigated the invasion of privacy caused by Facebook as it listens to every speech or a conversation for their user, claiming that it’s only for enhancing the way they advertise to every individual, and to relate the content with someone’s reality. This is to point that the company is built with destructive values, and their policy agreement is their biggest lie.

IMG_1332

If we trace the roots of the establishment, we will find the reason of its strength. We will understand how Zuckerberg gets a way with every lawsuit against the company. Do you still think that Zuckerberg is that strange collage student ?

IMG_1212

The power behind Facebook is the same power that funded all the wars in history. This explains clearly the relationship between the logo of the Illuminati and Facebook’s invasion of privacy. It’s all about gaining control with an unethical approach that does not know any values or religion. 

Here is the experience that pushed me to write these few words. As Facebook claims that they support equality and prevents hate speeches, I unfortunately have witnessed an unfair judgment as I was writing about Islam and Christianity in a polite way that maybe offensive or sensitive to some people. However, know that the truth sometimes hurts. Nothing was invented but we provided some evidences from the books of god. When I started to talk about Judaism in the same way, Noticed that few posts were deleted by Facebook claiming that the posts does not fit with their community standards. After posting Hitler Quotes talking about The Zaionists, Facebook has freezed my account and deleted the posts. Anyway, even if the post wasn’t acceptable in way, I felt offended by Facebook as they never block any harmful posts that talk about Islam. In Fact, many Islamophobia hate speeches were allowed on Facebook. 

The following are the notifications that I received few hours after the posts which seems to be monitored by people and not using an automated software. Some posts took more than a day until they are removed by FB. 

 

IMG_4596IMG_4595IMG_4612IMG_4614

 

 

Anyway, do not judge the posts. I was just comparing them with the harsh ones that  offended the Islamic religion and  allowed by FB. 

Here are some examples stated in the following article from the Huffingtonpost : Facebook Letting Vile Anti-Islamic Hate Speech Slip Through Reporting Tools.

Here are some written Examples:

facebook anti islam

https://m.huffingtonpost.com.au/2017/02/16/facebook-letting-vile-anti-islamic-hate-speech-slip-through-repo_a_21662089/

 

Notice that Zuckerberg has announced that Facebook will “fight to protect” Muslim rights. This is just a part of the game otherwise credibility will be lost. Indeed a speech that contains direct offending words will be deleted no matter what group wrote it, but as you notice the Hitler quote that I used, did not offend any one but explained the danger of the Illuminati and how they will be the cause for the coming war. So the filtering level in Facebook may vary based on the race, religion and other controlled factors. 

zakerburg

Recently we are witnessing the ban on any content that talks about the holocaust or Even flat earth content. This includes YouTube and other sites now. The question is why? History is history unless something is hidden and they don’t want it to reveal it and telling opinions about the shape of the earth won’t cause any damages to the world

B9D93A2E-A334-40C5-9B6A-F7CCCDAD603C8C3728AB-FF30-40B4-A7EA-FC0F47E50BE44858259F-DA6D-4151-968B-342B22D1AC7F8AD59D3E-1E0C-4B98-BB8C-85DC97722DAA

Knowing that the whole internet is controlled by the U.S government which explains why China keeps blocking American web portals and instead they started to create their own, indeed this new law of censorship brings a new argument on why all of this is happening although it’s clearly breaking America’s firs amendment

21E3DFFA-6A43-4929-B415-202F8D71FA033454F665-2071-4CBC-9F89-F26DA19312975E039421-E3F6-4FEC-8F67-390995BF09B45D55007A-DD3B-417A-A8D7-9AEF3CF9DE41

 

You know for a fact that there is something wrong when flat earth videos are banned. With a weak claim that states that talking about the subject may lead to the wrong information. Isn’t the whole media like that? Based on lies, corruption, and misleading to brainwashing? Taking it so serious is an indicator of fear for the truth to reveal. Similarly the ban for the  Nazi videos, it’s banned because people started to make videos about the truth behind the holocaust. Indeed it’s not the story that we all know. Indeed Hitler is not the Hitler that you know.  Here is an addition, slavery is still in America and will remain until the end of time. Do you know why? Because their government are slaves to the heads of Jews. No wonder they want hide the deals that the Jews did to shine the holocaust story the way they wanted

C9F56953-3239-485B-BA51-748C4A50AA98

الأخلاق أولاً

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته والصلاة والسلام على سيد الخلق والمرسلين سيدنا محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم

يكثر الإنتقاد عندما تكثر الأخطاء، ويكثر الإقتراح عندما يعجز الإنسان عن التنفيذ، فقد يكون صاحب العقل النير ضعيف من دون سلطه، والعقل الفاسد هو من يطغى حكمه ويعمل. فاذا عمل العقل الفاسد، فاتركه الى ان يقضي عليه الله ثم أعمل بعد هذا. وهل هذا يعني انك لا تعمل الآن؟ الجواب لا. انت تعمل على نفسك الآن لتغير غيرك لاحقاً. قال الله ( سَوَاۤءࣱ مِّنكُم مَّنۡ أَسَرَّ ٱلۡقَوۡلَ وَمَن جَهَرَ بِهِۦ وَمَنۡ هُوَ مُسۡتَخۡفِۭ بِٱلَّیۡلِ وَسَارِبُۢ بِٱلنَّهَارِ (١٠) لَهُۥ مُعَقِّبَـٰتࣱ مِّنۢ بَیۡنِ یَدَیۡهِ وَمِنۡ خَلۡفِهِۦ یَحۡفَظُونَهُۥ مِنۡ أَمۡرِ ٱللَّهِۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا یُغَیِّرُ مَا بِقَوۡمٍ حَتَّىٰ یُغَیِّرُوا۟ مَا بِأَنفُسِهِمۡۗ وَإِذَاۤ أَرَادَ ٱللَّهُ بِقَوۡمࣲ سُوۤءࣰا فَلَا مَرَدَّ لَهُۥۚ وَمَا لَهُم مِّن دُونِهِۦ مِن وَالٍ (١١)﴾ [الرعد ١٠-١١] صدق الله العظيم

ومن يعملون الآن ماذا يعملون؟ ماهو العمل؟ ماهو العلم؟ كلٌ يرى هذا بصورة تختلف عن غيره. وكلٌ سخره الله في هذة الدنيا لسبب معين، ولا يعلمه الا الله. وعلى الرغم من وجود هذة الحقيقة، مازال البشر ينظرون لأعمال غيرهم فينتقدون ويحكمون بما لا يعلمون

فاذا كثر الإنتقاد فاعلم أنه ظهر الفساد في البر والبحر، فسترى من ينتقد ليُظهر للناس انه على علم وأنه هو الصحيح وهذا من أسباب الفساد الأخلاقي، وكذلك سوف ترى من ينتقد لأن الله ثبته بكلمة الحق وعندها سترى المجتمع يهاجمه وهذا دليل الفساد في قيمنا الدينيه وابتعادنا عن الطريق الصحيح

قال الله ( یُثَبِّتُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ بِٱلۡقَوۡلِ ٱلثَّابِتِ فِی ٱلۡحَیَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡیَا وَفِی ٱلۡـَٔاخِرَةِۖ وَیُضِلُّ ٱللَّهُ ٱلظَّـٰلِمِینَۚ وَیَفۡعَلُ ٱللَّهُ مَا یَشَاۤءُ) صدق الله العظيم

وهنا لنخص إنتقاد الأقليات التي تقول بأن الأرض مسطحة، قيل عنهم انهم جهال وزنادقة، وقيل وقيل وقيل، لماذا؟

موضوع شكل الأرض موضوع كبير وليس من إختصاص كل البشر التحدث فيه، فاذا أنت من أهل العلم، اذا لم تصنع صاروخاً، ذهبت الى الفضاء، أو صورت الأرض بنفسك فلا تتحدث عن هذا الموضوع لأن فيه استهزاء وتغيير لكلام الله فهذا نعم علم لكنه مبني على أساس غير صحيح، وهو مبني على فلسفة عبادة الشمس لاغير وتم تلبيس الرياضيات به ليصبح حقيقة علمية ونخص بالذكر الإنفجار الكوني ومركزية الشمس وفيهم المخالفة الصريحة لكتاب الله وعلى أساس مركزية الشمس قيل ان الأرض كرة وتدور وهذا يخالف كلام الله الصريح

قال الله ( یَـٰۤأَیُّهَا ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفۡعَلُونَ) صدق الله العظيم

وانت ومن دون علم بالحقيقة تصبح في قائمة هذة الفئة التي قدست العلم وجعلته يطغى على كلام الله وهدي نبيه فلذلك مايحصل هنا هو صراع بين الحق والباطل وبين الدين وبما يسمى علم وهو في الحقيقة ليس الا الحاد

E033C980-90BD-491A-A0B1-941ECAC99476

لا يستطيع احدهم انكار العلم ولكن نتحدث تحديداً عن العلم القادم من وحي الشيطان كالإستنساخ وبعض أنواع التجميل ومركزية الشمس وكروية الأرض والتطور وكذلك السحر فهو علم يختص بالعد والأرقام، ولا نتهم من صدّق بكروية الأرض بحسن نية فقد علمونا إياها في المدارس ولقنونا هذا العلم تلقيناً مبينا. وكذلك هو أمر صعب أن يكذّب حيث كثرت الإسقاطات الغير الصحيحة وفي ظاهرها انها حقيقة مثبتة، وكذلك يؤيدها الكثير من أهل الإسلام وغيرهم، ولكن الحقيقة هي أن الله أراد أن يري هذة الأقليات ليمُن عليها من فضله لأنها آمنت بكتابه الذي فصّل خلق السموات والأرض تفصيلاً دقيقاً

62795C81-AC6C-475A-A641-5E7B106242F3

فما يواجهه أهل الأرض المسطحة هو الإستهزاء المستمر من غيرهم ولنعلم ان أغلب من يقولون ان الأرض مسطحة، هم من هداهم الله ونور لهم الطريق فترى فهمهم للكثير من آيات الله يكون متشابه وان كان كلٌ منهم يسكن في قارة مختلفة ولا يعرفون بعضهم لأن الله عز وجل هو من يعلمهم، فعندما يرون هذا العلم يخالف مخالفة صريحة لكتاب الله والتي لايراها الا من تفضل عليه الله، فان ردة الفعل عندهم تكون مبنية على الإيمان بكلام الله وتكذيب كل مايخالفه وهنا يصبح الموضوع أكثر تعقيداً ويصبح الجدل مقر كل حديث عن هذا. فلذلك على البشر إحترام آراء الغير وليعلم الناس ان كتاب الله هو مصدر العلم المنير في كل شيء وأن جنوده لهم المنتصرون

وليكن في إعتبارنا أن هناك من الملحدين من يؤمنون بالأرض المسطحة أيضاً فنحن هنا لانربط هذا بأي مذهب او غيره بل نقصد فئة معينه هنا وهم من كانوا في ضلاله ثم هداهم الله الى كتابه ثم أكتشفوا من كتاب الله كيفية خلق السموات والأرض، ونتحدث على من يحارب هذة الفئة تخصيصاً

ونقصد هنا حزب الله وهو المنتصر على من ينشر الأكاذيب بين الناس ولا نقصد هنا من صدق الأكاذيب فالناس تختلف وهناك من يعلم وهناك من لايعلم

الفكرة هي لماذا تقام كل هذة الحروب على من يقول أن الأرض مسطحة، لاتقام كل هذة الحروب اذا لم يكن هذا الحق من عند الله. فقد قاموا بتجميد حساباتنا في مواقع التواصل، وارسال جندهم إلينا لمحاولة تسكيتنا فلماذا كل هذا؟

 

A781E8C5-B4CE-4AF6-A478-023EBBEDC171

في عقل من يؤمن بالأرض المسطحة، أن من واجبه إبلاغ الناس بالحق وعدم كتمان الحق وخاصة أن الله قال ( وَإِلَى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ كَیۡفَ سُطِحَتۡ (٢٠) فَذَكِّرۡ إِنَّمَاۤ أَنتَ مُذَكِّر (٢١) لَّسۡتَ عَلَیۡهِم بِمُصَیۡطِرٍ (٢٢) إِلَّا مَن تَوَلَّىٰ وَكَفَرَ (٢٣) فَیُعَذِّبُهُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلۡعَذَابَ ٱلۡأَكۡبَرَ (٢٤) إِنَّ إِلَیۡنَاۤ إِیَابَهُمۡ (٢٥) ثُمَّ إِنَّ عَلَیۡنَا حِسَابَهُم (٢٦)﴾ [الغاشية ١٧-٢٦] صدق الله العظيم

أمر الله بالتذكير بعد واحدة من الآيات البينات التي تصف صفة من صفات الأرض فيأتي هذا ليذكر وإذ بالناس يتستهزئون به وهو يرى في هذا إستهزاء على كلام الله وهذة هي المشكلة. لا شك أن لوي النصوص وتوليفها بما يتوافق على ماقاله العلماء يبطل الضوابط الشرعية التي وضعها إبن عباس لتفسير القرآن، ولا شك أن الكثير لن يفهم سبب التذكير في القرآن فقد يقول انت لست بنبي حتى تذكر لكن تذكر ان من تفضل الله عليهم لن يفهموا القرآن كما يفهمه الكثير من الناس

ولنأخذ العبرة من الجن فهم أذكياء وفهموها فقال الله (وَإِذْ صَرَفْنَا إِلَيْكَ نَفَرًا مِنَ الْجِنِّ يَسْتَمِعُونَ الْقُرْآَنَ فَلَمَّا حَضَرُوهُ قَالُوا أَنْصِتُوا فَلَمَّا قُضِيَ وَلَّوْا إِلَى قَوْمِهِمْ مُنْذِرِينَ )، اذ ما استمعوا للقرآن وفهموه، ماذا فعلوا؟ ولوا الى قومهم منذرين وهذا مايفعله أهل الأرض المسطحة ونتحدث على من هداهم الله لهذا وليس من نقل المعلومة من غيره وهو ملحد أو ضال

لنعلم أن الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم لم يبعث الا ليتمم مكارم الأخلاق ونحن نشهد كل باطل من هذة الجدالات التي تقع بين هذة الفئتين ونقول عنها ماهي الا لهو للحديث الذي يضل عن سبيل الله، فبعض النظر اذا كنت تؤمن بكروية الأرض أو غيرها، من واجبك إحترام الرأي الآخر وعجباً عندما ترى هذا النوع من الجدل ينقلب الى لعن وتكفير وقذف. لماذا كل هذا؟ والمشكلة أنهم لن يصلوا الى حل في هذا الجدل لأن أهل الأرض المسطحة يرون هذة المسألة مسألة إيمانية بحته وقلبهم وكلام الله دليلهم القاطع في هذا بينما أهل العلم الذين يفصلون الدين عن العلم لديهم أقوال أخرى. في الأخير نقول أن الله يهدي من يشاء والحمد لله رب العالمين

 

FF7E0AE6-F314-46D7-9FE4-6539F7823DAA.jpeg

هل الشمس كبيرة؟

قال الله ( ۞ وَسَارِعُوۤا۟ إِلَىٰ مَغۡفِرَةࣲ مِّن رَّبِّكُمۡ وَجَنَّةٍ عَرۡضُهَا ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تُ وَٱلۡأَرۡضُ أُعِدَّتۡ لِلۡمُتَّقِینَ) صدق الله العظيم

لماذا لم يقل الله جنة عرضها كعرض السموات والشمس مثلاً؟ لأن الله خلق الأزواج في خِلقة محكمة مكملين لبعض متشابهين في الكثير من الأمور ومختلفين في بعضها. فالسموات زوج للأرض كما هو بين في كتاب الله فإذا ذكر الله السموات يذكر بعدها الأرض وهذا في أغلبية الآيات وليس جميعها. ويذكر الله السموات قبل الأرض لأن السموات في الأعلى والأرض أسفل منها فلهذا رفعها الله ( خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ بِغَیۡرِ عَمَد تَرَوۡنَهَاۖ)، وجعل لها سقفا كي لا تقع علينا ( وَجَعَلۡنَا ٱلسَّمَاۤءَ سَقۡفاً مَّحۡفُوظا ) صدق الله العظيم

ومن البلاغة في هذا الكتاب يذكر الله السموات بالسموات بينما الأراضين بالأرض وذلك لأن السموات سبع سموات طباق منفصلة بينما الأراضين فهي سبع أراضين متصلة لكل أرض خواصها المتفردة بها ( ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِی خَلَقَ سَبۡعَ سَمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تࣲ وَمِنَ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ مِثۡلَهُنَّۖ یَتَنَزَّلُ ٱلۡأَمۡرُ بَیۡنَهُنَّ لِتَعۡلَمُوۤا۟ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَیۡءࣲ قَدِیر وَأَنَّ ٱللَّهَ قَدۡ أَحَاطَ بِكُلِّ شَیۡءٍ عِلۡمَۢا) صدق الله العظيم

فلماذا قال الله جنة عرض كعرض السموات والأرض؟ لأنه لايوجد أكبر من السموات والأرض في هذا التكوين فعرض الأرض كعرض السماء والأرض السابعة هي بعيدة جداً عن الأرض الأولى. فلا تصغي لمن يقول لك أن الشمس أكبر من الأرض، وهي كوكب صلب، أعلم أن مانره ليس بالشمس بل هو انعكاس للشمس كما وضحنا سابقاً ( ۞ ٱللَّهُ نُورُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِۚ مَثَلُ نُورِهِۦ كَمِشۡكَوٰة فِیهَا مِصۡبَاحٌۖ ٱلۡمِصۡبَاحُ فِی زُجَاجَةٍۖ ٱلزُّجَاجَةُ كَأَنَّهَا كَوۡكَب دُرِّیࣱّ یُوقَدُ مِن شَجَرَة مُّبَـٰرَكَة زَیۡتُونَة لَّا شَرۡقِیَّة وَلَا غَرۡبِیَّة یَكَادُ زَیۡتُهَا یُضِیۤءُ وَلَوۡ لَمۡ تَمۡسَسۡهُ نَارࣱۚ نُّورٌ عَلَىٰ نُورࣲۚ یَهۡدِی ٱللَّهُ لِنُورِهِۦ مَن یَشَاۤءُۚ وَیَضۡرِبُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلۡأَمۡثَـٰلَ لِلنَّاسِۗ وَٱللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَیۡءٍ عَلِیم) صدق الله العظيم

الآن فكر معي من هو زوج الشمس ؟ الشمس يقابلها القمر ولا تتبع من يجادل فيما لاتدركه العقول والأبصار من دون كتاب منير بل بالرياضيات

ليكن لك  نظر في خلق كلاً من هذة المخلوقات. خلق الله الأرض بأقواتها في أربعة أيام بينما السموات بما فيهن في يومين. خلق الله الشمس والقمر والكواكب والنجوم كلها في يوم واحد فقط فكيف لنا ان نقارن الأرض بالشمس أو بكوكب او بغيره

 الأرض مركز الكون

في رواية صحيحة الإسناد عن البراء بن عازب، حدث إبن جرير الطبري في مسند عمر أن سجين في الأرض السفلى

وفي رواية أخرى عن البراء بن عازب، حدث البقيهي في شعب الإيمان في حديث صحيح السند أن سجين في الأرض السابعة السفلى

ونحن نعلم أن الأرض بساطاً وفيها طباق ملتصقة وكل واحدة منهم خلقت على أنها أرض متفردة بذاتها وكذلك مكملة للتي قبلها، جزء منها مغطى بالأرض التي فوقها وجزء آخر يقابل جو السماء هذة فطرة الله وهذا كلام سيد الخلق

الآن على نموذج الأرض الكروية، كيف سيتم معرفة مكان السبع أراضين؟ ثم اننا لانرى الا ثلوج في الأسفل. فلك أن تختار، تريد أن   تصدق مايسمونه بعلم أم تصدق سيد الخلق ؟

في باب وجود جهنم الآن في الأرض ووجود جزء منها يقابل السماء

كُنَّا مع رَسُولِ اللهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عليه وَسَلَّمَ، إذْ سَمِعَ وَجْبَةً، فَقالَ النبيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عليه وَسَلَّمَ: تَدْرُونَ ما هذا؟ قالَ: قُلْنَا: اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ أَعْلَمُ، قالَ: هذا حَجَرٌ رُمِيَ به في النَّارِ مُنْذُ سَبْعِينَ خَرِيفًا، فَهو يَهْوِي في النَّارِ الآنَ، حتَّى انْتَهَى إلى قَعْرِهَا

وفي رواية : هذا وَقَعَ في أَسْفَلِهَا فَسَمِعْتُمْ وَجْبَتَهَا

الراوي: أبو هريرة | المحدث: مسلم | المصدر: صحيح مسلم

الصفحة أو الرقم: 2844

خلاصة حكم المحدث: صحيح

ونفهم من هذا الحديث أنه اذا كانت جميع الأراضين بنفس العرض لما تم سماع الصوت بل الحديث يدل على ان الأرض السابعة اكبر من الأرض الأولى وكذلك اذا كانت الأراضي منفصلة لما سُمع الصوت

History is repeated in a relative way

History is repeated in a relative way, so as the moments we live and experiences. We talk about something, then we randomly pick a video on YouTube to find out a strange similarity between the subjects, words, or even colors. We barely remember things, so we keep watching the videos over and over to see what did not happen with us but there in the video. Later this missing element that we found in the video, we experience it in a relative way. Lets say your experience is sometimes represented in a song that you don’t know, and in addition this song gives you further insights. Can be songs, videos, people, books, nature, signs and so on. Indeed this is a bless form god and has no scientific explanation for it, but might call it relatively without using the mc2 function!

The space invaders and the future of text

The relationship between technology and place can be a key concept that perhaps will assist to conduct a successful investigation leading to invent better technologies.  As Marshal Mucluhan referred to technology as it is an extinction of the body and the mind, arguing that television consumption led to transform our perceptual systems and thinking (1994), many digital thinkers believed that Mcluhan’s concept of perception applies to the digital technologies of today (Bolteret al.2013). However, the complex characteristics of the emerging technologies, and their rapid growth, may require further serious research and experimentations in the field of media understanding and aesthetics. As a result of the new identities in the features within modern day technologies,  Bolter, Engberg and Maclntyre argued that media aesthetics are not singular as Macluhan suggested, this is because users are not passive anymore (2013). Far apart from the relationship between the television and their audiences, today’s technologies rely on the participation of the individual to create, design, and share the environment (Bolteret al.2013). This feedback circle that the users experience emphasizes on the the importance of redefining our understanding  of how we perceive our environment through technology (Bolteret al.2013). Thus, creating the technologies of tomorrow requires a clear understanding of the effects of modern day technologies, and how they are designed and for what purpose. A great question that may arise is about the level of participation of the individual in the creation and design of the environment through technology. One gateway to understand technologies is to consider the study of place. Before this study introduces place. Place can be computational or natural (Harrison and Dourish 1996). In this study, I will argue that the technology that incorporates the use of natural place is a key to provide a better safe life for our future generation.

Important concepts and movements have emphasized that the physical space is a source of disturbance and it is senseless. The ideas that ensured that reality should be vague and hidden within our output through a selection of information from the past (Manovich 2002, Smith 2003, SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009, Armitage 2015, Kozíket al.2015). This is to discuss postmodernism and what relates to it. Postmodernism served well in the account of philosophy, literature, film, and arts (SHEEHAN and 2004). Perhaps, it also supported the growth of both fields of the interactive arts and net arts (Manovich 2002, Lim and Yoo 2014). This includes the studies that confirmed the connection between new media and postmodernism (Rohle 2005). However, I believe that the relationship between new media and postmodernism should be different. To understand postmodernism, it is crucial to investigate modernity, a movement that died but its roots maintained. Modernity is the “modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence. This associates modernity with a time period and with an initial geographical location, but for the moment leaves its major characteristics safely stowed away in a black box” (Giddens 1967, p.1). Anthony Giddens, in his book the consequences of modernity, emphasized that one of the features of modernity is the separation between time and space (1967). Indeed, this leads to the expansion of knowledge and information, but also weakens our perception of understanding science (Giddens 1967). Similarly, postmodernism is a movement of arts that has been evolved over the years. “Post-modernism, if it means anything, is best kept to refer to styles or movements within literature, painting, the plastic arts, and architecture. It concerns aspects of aesthetic reflection upon the nature of modernity” (Giddens 1967, p.45).  A vast number of studies have included that postmodernism should be replaced, already has been replaced, or it just needs enhancements (SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009).  For example, the works of  Alan Kirby illustrated how new technologies replaced postmodernism in to what is called digimodernism, which reconfigured our culture (Kirby 2009). Some studies indicated that the movement reached its strength between the 1970s and 1980s, and started to slow down in the 1990s (SHEEHAN and 2004). However, the influence of postmodernism remained clear in the works of many recent new media studies such as (Rohle 2005, Manovich 2013). Let me paraphrase my argument to make it clear, I am arguing that the new media should not only aim to teach us how to have certain visual skills, but also we should learn from it how to build things. Familiarizing the physical space. New media is not only for relocating icons and symbols on the computer screen. This new pattern requires a different kind of knowledge. A knowledge that equals the visual space with reality. The question is: How can children learn the real science through modern day technologies ? Thus, the heart of this argument relies on understanding the importance of the natural place, nature, or reality in our visualization of computer imagery.

Lee Manovich in his book the language of new media, convincingly explained the intimate relationship between the software operations and postmodernism (2002). Stated “the practice of putting together a media object from already existing and commercially distributed media elements already existed with old media, but new media technology further standardizes it and makes it much easier to perform. What before involved scissors and glue now involves simply clicking on cut and paste. And, by encoding the operations of selection and combination into the very interfaces of authoring and editing software, new media legitimizes them. Pulling elements from databases and libraries becomes the default; creating them from scratch becomes an exception” (Manovich 2002, p.130). Also, “It is not accidental that the development of GUI which legitimized “cut and paste” logic as well as media manipulation software such as Photoshop, which popularized plug-in architecture, took place during the 1980s — the same decade when contemporary culture became post-modern.” (Manovich 2002, p.130).  From Manovich’s book, Fredric Jameson  stated “Rather than assembling more media recordings of reality, culture is now busy re-working, recombining and analyzing the already accumulated media material” (2002, p.131). This supports the concept of Manovich in which that the software “made postmodernism possible” (2002, p.131). Furthermore, in the brilliant work of Dziga Vertov, in the definition of modernization, the physical space was expressed  as a source of disruption (Manovich 2002). The ability to simulate old media in a computer, that later can be easily shared over networks, that what Manovich was discussing, considered the computer as a metamedium that enables other software mediums to take commands, and combine various media forms in one place, which form the concept of software hybridization (2013). The ideas of Manovich serve well in seeking the answer to the question of the level of the individual participation in the design and the creation of the environment. However, Manovich is a new media artist, designer, animator, programmer, and a film theorist (2002). Thus, the spirit of his works is based on his perception of the software environment, and arts. If there is a discussion about place in Manovich’s books, it is from a computational point of view such as his discussion about the GIS systems. The idea is that the software is taking the command in which software becomes a replacement of a large array of ancient physical, mechanical, and electronic technologies to create  new interfaces that interact with cultural artefacts (Manovich 2013). Monovich considered the hardware as a support that enhances our creations in the virtual space (Manovich 2013). For example, the mouse, the keyboard, or even the laptop are just tools to assist us in working in the virtual interface. Indeed the software is taking command, but an interesting question that I may seek to answer, what is the role of the hardware environment in the rapid revolution of the science of artificial intelligence, and materiality interactions? As it is already evolving. “The cost and complexity of hardware-centric systems can often be reduced by using software to perform tasks which don’t appear on the critical path. Alternately, the performance of software can sometimes be improved by using special purpose hardware to implement tasks which do appear on the critical path. Whatever the motivation, most modern systems are composed of both hardware and software components. Given the importance of the connection between hardware and software in these systems, it is surprising how little automated and machine-checkable support there is for co-design space exploration” (Kinget al.2015, p.1). The study aimed to limit the gap between hardware and software to enable the developers to create rapid systems (Kinget al.2015).  There are different possibilities on the consequences of the next generation hardware development. In some areas where solar energy takes place, the nature is the source that makes a system work, rather than electricity. MIT professor Vladimir Bulović, researched the numerous opportunities in the developments of nanotechnology and solar energy that may rise the technology into a whole new level (MOCHARI 2015). What I am trying to reach here is that there will be a time where   humans will be able to learn, design, create arts, and construct in a different way using hardware technologies and other physical devices. As an initial point, the semiotic language within a computer screen, should find a good start to live outside the digital box, or the computer. For example, the hologram of no goggles and peripherals.

Indeed, postmodernism is important. The positive value of pluralism is clear. Through the important role of “radical pluralism in democracy, tolerance and diversity”, it supported the practice of the “freedom of expression” (Kozíket al.2015, p.119). The way that postmodernism symbolically represents the world have opened the gates into a new kind of knowledge (Kozíket al.2015). The question is: will this kind of knowledge survive with the future technologies? will it survive the new evolution of mankind?   The best definition that explains the use of postmodernism in the computer might be: “that condition in which for the first time, and as a result of technologies that allow large-scale storage, access, and reproduction of records of the past, the past appears to be included in the present, or at the present’s disposal, and in which the ratio between present and past has therefore changed” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.10). Postmodernism is the base that formed the arts and literature of today (Giddens 1967, SHEEHAN and 2004).The trustful manipulation in the artefacts is what made this argument possible. According to  Manovich, the cut and paste is indeed related to postmodernism (Manovich 2002, p.131). The cut and the paste are the reasons of how I quoted Manovich extensively to argue that machines should connect to reality. It is the cut and paste that made me a computer programmer. In my masters at California Sate University East Bay, me and my partner Jeff Stott have created an interactive multimedia installation that uses the human brain to generate audiovisual content. Part of my duties was to design a patch in Max Msp to use it as a processing hub to connect all the sensors to the physical interface that we have designed. In this stage, I confirm that my study of computer science, and my few experiences in computer programming did not serve well. However, I was confident as the nature in the “automation” of new media, enables the user to become a co-author (Manovich 2002). Using the Max tutorials, manuals, and code examples – provided a complete source for constructing a Max patch. As well the user generated patches that are available on the web. Thus, this little previous knowledge in computer programming, with understanding the interactive culture and the internet, and of course the cut and paste, is what made the job done by the end of the day. Thus, we can confirm that manipulation plays a major role in the world of postmodernism.

However, manipulation is great but not in every context. The literature is trustful. This dose not mean that manipulation in real life, or in the computer is always a positive thing. In fact, when some one claims that another person manipulated him, this mainly understood as a negative situation. This kind of manipulation implies negativity, and   needs explanation to change its meaning. This is the case when the murderer commits his crime, and his lawyer makes him innocent in the eyes of the judges. In terms of computers, it is true that the internet resulted to improve the intellectual work, opportunities, and cultural change, but perhaps the artificial environment of the internet is problematic (Kozíket al.2015). Problems such as allowing the inability to distinguish between reality and virtually (Kozíket al.2015). As a consequence, it became the gateway to identity manipulation. As a result of anonymity, the internet became a great opportunity for cyber crimes with all of its kinds (Glaseret al.2002). As mentioning the benefits of the cut and paste, It is also worth to mention that it is a major contributor in the world of plagiarism. Alastair Pennycook, in his publication: “Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism” under the subject “Postmodern Uncertainty: The Death of the Author” he stated : “the notion of the author and individual creativity, and this argument that meanings are in a sense in circulation, that language is constantly cycled and recycled, raise profound questions about how we consider the notion of textual borrowing or plagiarism” (Pennycook 1996, p.211). Or in other words, postmodernism made plagiarism simple. As a result, the internet of today plays a major cause in increasing plagiarism (Howard 2007). As the conclusion of understanding how the relationship between computer texts and reality, a suggestion to avoid plagiarism is that computer texts should be more clever and connect more to reality by shifting its properties. As text should have the ability to recognise the users by the computer cameras and incorporate an automation of a plagiarism system that auto detects and auto blocks. The detection in real time by connecting the text to the physical space, or to reality is a clear suggestion. This is not an invasion of privacy. The ultimate invasion is caused by the advance in the information technology and specifically over the internet (A¨ımeur and Sch˝onfeld 2011).

This argument is all about proving that the physical space, nature, and reality will have an added value to the improvement of  new media. Thus, the aim in this argument is to trace the reasons of the exclusion of reality and space, and to prove their added value in our creation.  Paul Virilio’s views are concerned with the interaction of the human consequences with the disturbance of the physical space (Armitage 2015). Paul Virilio was a prisoner of war, and his theories basically were an escape from reality (Armitage 2015). “Virilio is the last endist, recuperating the most abiding concern of philosophical postmodernism, even as he shows its ominous determinations and potentially hazardous consequences for life in the twenty-first century (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.38). The problem in excluding the nature in the way we collect our information may result in accruing generalized knowledge only (Giddens 1967). The consequence of polarity is that it changed the ratio between the past and the present, which almost they become the same (SHEEHAN and 2004). Which made “The present of postmodernism has come to seem like a stalled present, an agitated but idle meanwhile” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.11). “The post-modern outlook sees a plurality of heterogeneous claims to knowledge, in which science does not have a privileged place” (Giddens 1967, p.2).  “The modern mind assumed that it knew more than its predecessors because the natural and historical science were flooding it with new knowledge about nature and history, the postmodern mind argues (paradoxically) that it knows more than others did because it has discovered how little the human mind can know” (Smith 2003, p.loc 108). “If modern physics showed us a world at odds with our senses, postmodern physics is showing us one which is at odds with our imagination, where imagination is taken as imagery” (Smith 2003, p.loc 231).This explains the death of the philosophy  of the metaphysics (Smith 2003). “Leonardo da Vinci is symbolic. His anatomical studies and drawings in general disclose a direction of interest that has turned eye into camera, in his case an extraordinary camera that could stop the hawk in flight and fix the rearing steed. Once again humankind was attending to nature’s details as a potential messenger of meaning” (Smith 2003, p.loc 207).

The existence of the technology of today is a result of the great inventions from the western culture. The western inventions are the reason behind making the algorithms of Mohammed Al Khawarzmi alive. Dennis Ritchie the inventor of the C programming language, Seymour Papert the inventor of the logo language and the mechanical turtle, David Liddle the lead developer of the star system, Bill gates and his windows, Tim Berners Lee, the creator of the world wide web and the founder of the w3schools and so on. These inventions have shaped our lives. However, it is crucial for this context to mention those who think beyond nature. The different ways of thinking of Newton, Einstein, And Hawking is what led to their discoveries. It’s simply thinking about time and space from a different perspective (Hawking 1988, Lorentz 2014). In Google’s Zeitgeist conference, Hawking stated “Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics” and declared that philosophers and their arts are dead (Warman 2011). With this, we showed both extreme perspectives, the ones that support the arts, and the other that support science. I believe a middle ground will lead to a better future. Somewhere in the middle where this fusion collides to build a generation that understands the arts and science at the same time, forming a new identity of the individual. This will not be achieved by learning in schools, it should be gained from our daily technology consumption. Thus, Technology should behave differently. A question that may arise: Applied science and engineering schools do exist. Therefore, what is the reason of arguing about postmodernism? The answer is because the aim here is to build a medium that enable the next generation to learn arts and science from every day life. A life long learning game or a device for example.  A product of a new new media technology that incorporates text, images and sound . A new media that has a different identity that respects the arts and science. I believe, postmodernism is  a great symbol of arts and literature, and thus, it should not be excluded, but not giving it too much of attention because science, as Hawking believes is the future. Furthermore, I believe science with no meaning is simply worthless. Science should be hidden within our digital interfaces, and not any interface, an interface that combines reality with imagination. The previous studies that discussed the problems in the inability to distinguish between reality and imagination, this inability can be unitized for a positive cause. A generation that is in control of their magic circle.There is so much to discover in nature, and if we only keep remixing the past, we might not be able to follow up with the future technologies. One of the attributes that makes a technology emerging is the uncertainty and ambiguity (Rotoloet al.2015). Then, this defines the interest of the artist in the technology.  According to the postmodernism thoughts, humans are able to learn through imagination. Learning of course will be achieved but to a certain extent. A future artist should be able to design his/her interactive art installation with the deeper understanding of  physics, dynamics, and programming codes of his/her creation. Thus, the suggestion is a fusion of balanced science and arts in an interesting way. Which provides a true situated meaning to a clear scientific knowledge.  Can  games do this?