لايخلف الله وعده

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم والصلاة والسلام على سيد الخلق والمرسلين سيدنا محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم

قال الله (وَذَكِّرْ فَإِنَّ الذِّكْرَى تَنْفَعُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ) صدق الله العظيم

والمؤمنين هم الذين يؤمنون بكلام الله وهدي نبيه من دون التحقيق وتحكيم العقل على النقل، المؤمنين الذين يعلمون في ماذا يتفكرون ويعقلون وفي ماذا فقط يسلمون ويؤمنون، المؤمنون الذين يفلحون ويحسنون، ويفهمون كلام الله من هداه وليس من ماقاله البشر، ويعلمون ان كلام الله لايفسره الا كلام الله أو هدي نبيه المصطفى صلى الله عليه وسلم. المؤمنون الذين يعلمون لماذا سمي الصديق بأبي بكر الصديق. الذين يعلمون معنى التصديق فتراه في قولهم وكذلك في فعلهم

نتحدث عن سقوط العرب والنصر القريب، فهذا تلخيص لما كنا نكتب عنه، وفيه يتضح حال أُمَّة محمد، وهو بشرى وخير ونصر قريب. الفساد الظاهر يأتي معه الصلاح وفي هذا صحوة وحضارة، والباطل يأتي معه الحق ليدمغه وفي هذا نصر وقوة، والدنيا دار بلاء وفتنه، فإذا ظهرت الفتن والمحن، فنعلم بحدوث عذاب قريب ليحصل التبديل أو التطهير ولا يعلم هذا الا من يريه الله هذا، والرؤية حق وان مع العسر يسر إن مع العسر يسر

وكانت النتيجة لمن يقول هذا القول، سخط الناس عليه وقذفه بكل ما لذ وطاب ولكن بإذن الله هو اجر عظيم عند الله وهو مايرضي الله لان كل عبد صالح ماهو الا مستخلف ﴿وَهُوَ ٱلَّذِی جَعَلَكُمۡ خَلَائف ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَرَفَعَ بَعۡضَكُمۡ فَوۡقَ بَعۡض دَرَجَـٰت لِّیَبۡلُوَكُمۡ فِی مَاۤ آتاكم  إِنَّ رَبَّكَ سَرِیعُ ٱلۡعِقَابِ وَإِنَّهُۥ لَغَفُور رَّحِیمُۢ﴾ [الأنعام ١٦٥] صدق الله العظيم

قال الله(۞ وَٱتۡلُ عَلَیۡهِمۡ نَبَأَ نُوحٍ إِذۡ قَالَ لِقَوۡمِهِۦ یَـٰقَوۡمِ إِن كَانَ كَبُرَ عَلَیۡكُم مَّقَامِی وَتَذۡكِیرِی بِـآيات ٱللَّهِ فَعَلَى ٱللَّهِ تَوَكَّلۡتُ فَأَجۡمِعُوۤا۟ أَمۡرَكُمۡ وَشُرَكَاۤءَكُمۡ ثُمَّ لَا یَكُنۡ أَمۡرُكُمۡ عَلَیۡكُمۡ غُمَّة  ثُمَّ ٱقۡضُوۤا۟ إِلَیَّ وَلَا تُنظِرُونِ (٧١) فَإِن تَوَلَّیۡتُمۡ فَمَا سَأَلۡتُكُم مِّنۡ أَجۡرٍۖ إِنۡ أَجۡرِیَ إِلَّا عَلَى ٱللَّهِۖ وَأُمِرۡتُ أَنۡ أَكُونَ مِنَ ٱلۡمُسۡلِمِینَ (٧٢) فَكَذَّبُوهُ فَنَجَّیۡنَـٰهُ وَمَن مَّعَهُۥ فِی ٱلۡفُلۡكِ وَجَعَلۡنَـٰهُمۡ خَلائف وَأَغۡرَقۡنَا ٱلَّذِینَ كَذَّبُوا۟ بِـَٔایَـٰتِنَاۖ فَٱنظُرۡ كَیۡفَ كَانَ عَـٰقِبَةُ ٱلۡمُنذَرِینَ (٧٣)﴾ [يونس ٧١-٧٣] صدق الله العظيم

انتهى الحديث بعد أصدق الحديث ولا يهلك الا الفاسق الفاسد

قال الله (وَعَدَ اللَّهُ الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا مِنْكُمْ وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ لَيَسْتَخْلِفَنَّهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ كَمَا اسْتَخْلَفَ الَّذِينَ مِنْ قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَيُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمْ دِينَهُمُ الَّذِي ارْتَضَى لَهُمْ وَلَيُبَدِّلَنَّهُمْ مِنْ بَعْدِ خَوْفِهِمْ أَمْنًا يَعْبُدُونَنِي لَا يُشْرِكُونَ بِي شَيْئًا وَمَنْ كَفَرَ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ فَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ ) صدق الله العظيم

أنظر لهذه الآية الكريمة وما فيها. فيها وعد من الله ولايخلف الله وعده لعباده ( وَعْدَ اللَّهِ لَا يُخْلِفُ اللَّهُ وَعْدَهُ وَلَكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ )، ولكن ماهذا الوعد؟

الوعد هو استخلاف المسلمين في الأرض وتمكينهم في دينهم وتبديل الخوف بالأمن. لماذا ذكر الله الخوف هنا؟ لأن من يقول الحق ويؤمن بالله حق الإيمان، لا يخاف الا من الله ( الذين  یُبَلِّغُونَ رِسَـٰلَـٰتِ ٱللَّهِ وَیَخۡشَوۡنَهُۥ وَلَا یَخۡشَوۡنَ أَحَدًا إِلَّا ٱللَّهَۗ وَكَفَىٰ بِٱللَّهِ حَسِیبا) صدق الله العظيم

 

 

ولكن قول الحق يتعرض بسببه المسلم لبعض الخطر، ولا يجتاز هذا العبد الا بتوفيق من الله (هُوَ ٱلَّذِیۤ أَنزَلَ ٱلسَّكِینَةَ فِی قُلُوبِ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِینَ لِیَزۡدَادُوۤا۟ إِیمَـٰنا مَّعَ إِیمَـٰنِهِمۡۗ وَلِلَّهِ جُنُودُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِۚ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ عَلِیمًا حَكِیما)، وكذلك بسلطان ينصره على من يعاديه ﴿وَقُل رَّبِّ أَدۡخِلۡنِی مُدۡخَلَ صِدۡق وَأَخۡرِجۡنِی مُخۡرَجَ صِدۡق وَٱجۡعَل لِّی مِن لَّدُنكَ سُلۡطَـٰنا نَّصِیرا (٨٠) وَقُلۡ جَاۤءَ ٱلۡحَقُّ وَزَهَقَ ٱلۡبَـٰطِلُۚ إِنَّ ٱلۡبَـٰطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقا (٨١)﴾ [الإسراء ٨٠-٨١] صدق الله العظيم

فإذا لم تكن كلمة المسلم هي العليا، ولم يكن هو المستخلف في الأرض، فنعلم ان هناك خلل ما، لاتجتمع أُمَّة محمد على ضلالة ولكن لم تتم عبادة الله حق عبادته وفي هذا تصديق لقول المصطفى صلى الله عليه وسلم بأننا سنطبق سنن أهل الكتاب نفسها اي الأخطاء كتبديل كلام الله، التحليل والتحريم بما لم يحكم به الله، المستحدثات، والإتباع الأعمى للبشر والخضوع للأعداء

قال الله (مِّنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِینَ رِجَال صَدَقُوا۟ مَا عَـٰهَدُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ عَلَیۡهِۖ فَمِنۡهُم مَّن قَضَىٰ نَحۡبَهُۥ وَمِنۡهُم مَّن یَنتَظِرُۖ وَمَا بَدَّلُوا۟ تَبۡدِیلا) صدق الله العظيم

وقال الله (۞ ياأيها ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لَا تَتَّخِذُوا۟ ٱلۡیَهُودَ وَٱلنَّصَـٰرَىٰۤ أَوۡلِیَاۤءَۘ بَعۡضُهُمۡ أَوۡلِیَاۤءُ بَعۡض  وَمَن یَتَوَلَّهُم مِّنكُمۡ فَإِنَّهُۥ مِنۡهُمۡۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا یَهۡدِی ٱلۡقَوۡمَ ٱلظَّـٰلِمِینَ (٥١) فَتَرَى ٱلَّذِینَ فِی قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَض یُسَـٰرِعُونَ فِیهِمۡ یَقُولُونَ نَخۡشَىٰۤ أَن تُصِیبَنَا  دائرة فَعَسَى ٱللَّهُ أَن یَأۡتِیَ بِٱلۡفَتۡحِ أَوۡ أَمۡر مِّنۡ عِندِهِۦ فَیُصۡبِحُوا۟ عَلَىٰ مَاۤ أَسَرُّوا۟ فِیۤ أَنفُسِهِمۡ نَـٰدِمِینَ (٥٢) وَیَقُولُ ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوۤا۟ أَهَـٰۤؤُلَاۤءِ ٱلَّذِینَ أَقۡسَمُوا۟ بِٱللَّهِ جَهۡدَ أَیۡمَـٰنِهِمۡ إِنَّهُمۡ لَمَعَكُمۡۚ حَبِطَتۡ أَعۡمَـٰلُهُمۡ فَأَصۡبَحُوا۟ خَـٰسِرِینَ (٥٣)﴾ [المائدة ٥١-٥٣]، والمقصودون هنا هم أعداء الإسلام من أهل الكتاب وليس أهل الكتاب كافة ( ۞ لَتَجِدَنَّ أَشَدَّ ٱلنَّاسِ عَدَ ٰ⁠وَة لِّلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱلۡیَهُودَ وَٱلَّذِینَ أَشۡرَكُوا۟ۖ وَلَتَجِدَنَّ أَقۡرَبَهُم مَّوَدَّة  لِّلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱلَّذِینَ قَالُوۤا۟ إِنَّا نَصَـٰرَىٰۚ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ بِأَنَّ مِنۡهُمۡ قِسِّیسِینَ وَرُهۡبَان وَأَنَّهُمۡ لَا یَسۡتَكۡبِرُونَ (٨٢) وَإِذَا سَمِعُوا۟ مَاۤ أُنزِلَ إِلَى ٱلرَّسُولِ تَرَىٰۤ أَعۡیُنَهُمۡ تَفِیضُ مِنَ ٱلدَّمۡعِ مِمَّا عَرَفُوا۟ مِنَ ٱلۡحَقِّۖ یَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَاۤ ءَامَنَّا فَٱكۡتُبۡنَا مَعَ ٱلشَّـٰهِدِینَ (٨٣) وَمَا لَنَا لَا نُؤۡمِنُ بِٱللَّهِ وَمَا جَاۤءَنَا مِنَ ٱلۡحَقِّ وَنَطۡمَعُ أَن یُدۡخِلَنَا رَبُّنَا مَعَ ٱلۡقَوۡمِ ٱلصَّـٰلِحِینَ (٨٤) فَأَثَـٰبَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ بِمَا قَالُوا۟ جَنَّـٰت تَجۡرِی مِن تَحۡتِهَا ٱلۡأَنۡهَـٰرُ خَـٰلِدِینَ فِیهَاۚ وَذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ جَزَاۤءُ ٱلۡمُحۡسِنِینَ (٨٥) وَٱلَّذِینَ كَفَرُوا۟ وَكَذَّبُوا۟ بِـَٔایَـٰتِنَاۤ أُو۟لَـٰۤىِٕكَ أَصۡحَـٰبُ ٱلۡجَحِیمِ (٨٦)﴾ [المائدة ٨٢-٨٦] صدق الله العظيم

قال الله ( یَـاأيها ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لَا تَتَّخِذُوا۟ عَدُوِّی وَعَدُوَّكُمۡ أَوۡلِیَاۤءَ تُلۡقُونَ إِلَیۡهِم بِٱلۡمَوَدَّةِ وَقَدۡ كَفَرُوا۟ بِمَا جَاۤءَكُم مِّنَ ٱلۡحَقِّ یُخۡرِجُونَ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَإِیَّاكُمۡ أَن تُؤۡمِنُوا۟ بِٱللَّهِ رَبِّكُمۡ إِن كُنتُمۡ خَرَجۡتُمۡ جِهَـٰدا فِی سَبِیلِی وَٱبۡتِغَاۤءَ مَرۡضَاتِیۚ تُسِرُّونَ إِلَیۡهِم بِٱلۡمَوَدَّةِ وَأَنَا۠ أَعۡلَمُ بِمَاۤ أَخۡفَیۡتُمۡ وَمَاۤ أَعۡلَنتُمۡۚ وَمَن یَفۡعَلۡهُ مِنكُمۡ فَقَدۡ ضَلَّ سَوَاۤءَ ٱلسَّبِیلِ) صدق الله العظيم

في باب حسن الخلق والغلظة

في باب حسن الخلق والغلظة

سأل أحد الجهال عبداً صالحاً فقال له وفي سؤاله طابع السخرية والإستهزاء: لماذا لا تتلطف في ردودك مع هذه المجموعة من الناس؟

قال الرجل الصالح: ولكن هؤلاء الناس يتهجمون علينا ليلاً ونهاراً وإن سكتنا فسيزيدون في الإفتراء على الله وعلينا فينشرون الإلحاد والرذيلة ويتقولون علينا

قال الجاهل: ولكن حسن الخلق هو طريق المسلم

قال الرجل الصالح: كان الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم يغفر لمن يتعدى عليه ولكنه يقاتل كل من عادى الله او تعدى على حق من حقوق الله. كما فعل هذا ذي القرنين فكان يعذب كل من لايؤمن وفي هذه الغلظة دلالة على حب الله لعبده وحب العبد لربه

قال الجاهل: ولكن هؤلاء يستهزئون بك فقط ويتهمونك انت بالجهل والكذب على الله فلماذا تهتم بالرد عليهم او حتى محاولة ردعهم لانك لست من المكلفين لفعل هذا

قال الرجل الصالح: انما يبلونا الله ليعلم من أحسن منا عملاً ونعلم ان حسن الخلق والقول الطيب هو أساس المعاملة مع الناس، ولكن هؤلاء يستهزئون بكلامنا وما كلامنا الا ماقاله الله أو قاله رسوله، والأهم من كل هذا، هل ترى هؤلاء البشر من الناس؟

قال الجاهل: صدقت وجزاك الله خير ولكن ان لم يكن هؤلاء من الإنس فمن يكونون؟

قال الرجل الصالح: الم تعلم ان الشيطان يجري في عروق الناس؟ الم تعلم ان الله قال ان الشياطين تكون من الجن وكذلك من الإنس والذين يسعون في الإرض فساد؟ وهل تعلم ان كلمة كفر لا يراها الا المسلم على وجه الدجال؟

قال الجاهل: بلا

قال العبد الصالح: إذاً انه من حسن الخلق أن تشكر الله انه يريك الطاغي أوالمنافق فيمن عليك ويرزقك ولهذا يتوجب عليك ان تغلظ عليه، وبهذا انت تأدبت في عبادتك لربك، وحاربت شراً قد يحدث غداً، وان تأدبت مع الطاغوت، فلن يتأدب هو معك بل سيزيد في الطغيان، وهذا لنعلم ان السيئة جزاؤها سيئة مثلها

الشاهد: من حسن إسلام المرء تركه مالايعنيه فأنت لاتعلم مايراه غيرك

الاستهزاء بالمؤمنين له حالتان

الحالة الأولى: الاستهزاء والسخرية بالمؤمنين بخَلقهم أو خُلقهم وهذا فيه اثم كبير

الحالة الثانية: الاستهزاء بالمؤمنين بسبب تمسكهم بالإسلام، وهذا يراعى فيه أمران

الأمر الأول: أن يكون المستهزئ جاهلًا بأن ما يستهزئ به من الشريعة الإسلامية

الأمر الثاني: أن لا يقصد المستهزئ باستهزائه ما يقوم به المسلم من الطاعات

هؤلاء الذين يسخرون بالملتزمين بدين الله، المنفذين لأوامر الله، فيهم نوع نفاق؛ لأنَّ الله قال عن المنافقين: (الَّذِينَ يَلْمِزُونَ الْمُطَّوِّعِينَ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ فِي الصَّدَقَاتِ وَالَّذِينَ لاَ يَجِدُونَ إِلاَّ جُهْدَهُمْ فَيَسْخَرُونَ مِنْهُمْ سَخِرَ اللّهُ مِنْهُمْ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ) [التوبة: 79] صدق الله العظيم

ثم إن كانوا يستهزئون بهم من أجل ما هم عليه من الشرع فإن استهزاءهم بهم استهزاء بالشريعة، والاستهزاء بالشريعة فيه اثم عظيم

أما سخرية الإنسان ممن يَسخر منه فجائزة، وهذا من العدل؛ لأنه يقابل السخرية بمثلها، ومع ذلك فتركها أولى، قال الله تعالى: (وَإِنْ عَاقَبْتُمْ فَعَاقِبُواْ بِمِثْلِ مَا عُوقِبْتُم بِهِ وَلَئِن صَبَرْتُمْ لَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لِّلصَّابِرينَ) [النحل: 126] صدق الله العظيم

وقال تعالى: (وَجَزَاء سَيِّئَةٍ سَيِّئَةٌ مِّثْلُهَا فَمَنْ عَفَا وَأَصْلَحَ فَأَجْرُهُ عَلَى اللَّهِ إِنَّهُ لا يُحِبُّ الظَّالِمِينَ ) [الشورى : 40] صدق الله العظيم

وذكر الله عن نوح وقومه: (وَكُلَّمَا مَرَّ عَلَيْهِ مَلأٌ مِّن قَوْمِهِ سَخِرُواْ مِنْهُ قَالَ إِن تَسْخَرُواْ مِنَّا فَإِنَّا نَسْخَرُ مِنكُمْ كَمَا تَسْخَرُونَ) [هود: 38] صدق الله العظيم

فقابل نوح عليه السلام والمؤمنون معه سخرية الكفار منهم بسخرية

#السبع_أراضين

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم والصلاة والسلام على سيد الخلق والمرسلين سيدنا محمد عليه الصلاة والسلام

هدفنا من هذه الكتابة هو وضع حد بين من يقول أن الأرض كرة ومن يقول أنها مسطوحة على وجه الماء. لأكن صريح معك، أنا من هؤلاء الذين يقولون أن الأرض مسطحة، وسأحاول جاهداً من هذه الكتابة إعطاء أسباب ومبررات تتناسب مع قول بعض أئمة السلف بأن الأرض كروية. أخص بالذكر هنا أقوال شيخ الإسلام إبن تيمية وابن حزم رحمة الله عليهم. ولا ننسى أنه يوجد من قال بتسطح الأرض كابن عباس والسيوطي وابن عطية والبغوي والقرطبي وإبن جرير وغيرهم. نستبعد من هذا أي قول يأخذ بمركزية الشمس وما يلحقها من نظريات

لنبدأ بقوله تعالى ( ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِی خَلَقَ سَبۡعَ سَمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠ت وَمِنَ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ مِثۡلَهُنَّۖ یَتَنَزَّلُ ٱلۡأَمۡرُ بَیۡنَهُنَّ لِتَعۡلَمُوۤا۟ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَیۡء قَدِیر وَأَنَّ ٱللَّهَ قَدۡ أَحَاطَ بِكُلِّ شَیۡءٍ عِلۡمَۢا) صدق الله العظيم

ولا يختلف مسلم على وجود سبع أراضين كما أن هناك سبع سموات، يتشابهون من حيث التركيبة الأساسية والإرتباط وكذلك الحجم، الأرض الأولى والتي نسكن فيها كحجم السماء الأولى، والثانية كالثانية، وهكذا الى أن نصل الى السماء السابعة وفوقها أو فيها الجنة، وكذلك الأرض السابعة وحولها جهنم أو فيها. هذا ما تدور حولة حقيقة الأرض المسطحة ولا يوجد نموذج كروي يستطيع تطبيق السبع أراضين، حيث هذا غير متواجد علمياً، ولكن قام بعض الفلكين بإفتراض أن السبع أراضين هي طبقات الأرض وقشرتها وهذا لاينطبق على ماقاله الله، فهي سبع أراضين طباقا أي فوق بعضهن وليسو داخل بعضهن، وكل أرض لها استقلالية وان كانت متصلة باللتي فوقها، ولكل أرض هوائها فالفاصل بين كل أرض وأرض هي الأفلاك السماوية ونقصد القبة. كل هذا تم تفصيلة مسبقاً بدعمه من القرآن والسنة وخاصة موضوع الأراضين وهوائهم وكذلك سجين الموجودة في الأرض السابعة. لنعلم أنه فعلياً وعلمياً طبقات الأرض الداخلية اربع بناء على ماتم إكتشافة وكذلك نجهل صحة هذه المعلومة ولكن لنؤكد أنها ليست السبع أراضين اللتي تحتوي على البحار، فسبع سموات لسبع أراضين لسبع أبحر بما في هذا البحر المسجور والله أعلم فقد يكون البحر المسجور في السماء فهذه المعلومة الأخيرة مازالت قيد الدراسة

cafa864b-7cf4-41d9-b905-7dfe1b6f93d6.jpeg

قال الله: (سَابِقُوۤا۟ إِلَىٰ مَغۡفِرَة مِّن رَّبِّكُمۡ وَجَنَّةٍ عَرۡضُهَا كَعَرۡضِ ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِ أُعِدَّتۡ لِلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ بِٱللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِۦۚ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ فَضۡلُ ٱللَّهِ یُؤۡتِیهِ مَن یَشَاۤءُۚ وَٱللَّهُ ذُو ٱلۡفَضۡلِ ٱلۡعَظِیمِ) صدق الله العظيم

يقسم الله بعرض السماء ويقرن هذا بعرض الأرض فهل عرض السماء مثل عرض الأرض؟ زعم بعض المفسرين أن السماء أعظم في شأنها وأنها أكبر في الحجم. فنقول نعم يمكننا تصديق هذا ولكن ماهو البرهان على هذا؟ إذا كانت الحجة أنه يتم ذكر السماء في القرآن دائماً قبل الأرض، نعم قد يكون هذا صحيح ولكن لماذا لانقول أيضاً أنها تعني أن السماء فوق والأرض أسفل؟ قال الله: ( فَأَزَلَّهُمَا ٱلشَّیۡطَـٰنُ عَنۡهَا فَأَخۡرَجَهُمَا مِمَّا كَانَا فِیهِۖ وَقُلۡنَا ٱهۡبِطُوا۟ بَعۡضُكُمۡ لِبَعۡضٍ عَدُو وَلَكُمۡ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ مُسۡتَقَر وَمَتَـٰعٌ إِلَىٰ حِین)، وكذلك في الأرض حياتنا الدنيا (وَمِنۡهُم مَّن یَقُولُ رَبَّنَاۤ ءَاتِنَا فِی ٱلدُّنۡیَا حَسَنَة وَفِی ٱلۡـَٔاخِرَةِ حَسَنَة وَقِنَا عَذَابَ ٱلنَّارِ)، فالأرض بكل طبقاتها هي السفلى (الدنيا) ولذلك تم تقديم السماء عليها، وهذا برهان لسبب التقديم. فأما قول أن تقديم السماء على الأرض في القرآن يعني أن السماء أعظم وأكبر، فتستطيع الرد بقول: إذا كان هذا صحيحاً فلماذا قدم الله خلق الأرض عن خلق السماء بل وخلقها في يومين وخلق أقواتها في أربع ثم خلق السماء وسقفها وكواكبها وشمسها وقمرها في يومين ؟

قال الله: (۞ قُلۡ أَىِٕنَّكُمۡ لَتَكۡفُرُونَ بِٱلَّذِی خَلَقَ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ فِی یَوۡمَیۡنِ وَتَجۡعَلُونَ لَهُۥۤ أَندَاداً ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ رَبُّ ٱلۡعَـٰلَمِینَ (٩) وَجَعَلَ فِیهَا رَوَ ٰ⁠سِیَ مِن فَوۡقِهَا وَبَـٰرَكَ فِیهَا وَقَدَّرَ فِیهَاۤ أَقۡوَ ٰ⁠تَهَا فِیۤ أَرۡبَعَةِ أَیَّام سَوَاۤء للسائلين (١٠) ثُمَّ ٱسۡتَوَىٰۤ إِلَى ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ وَهِیَ دُخَان فَقَالَ لَهَا وَلِلۡأَرۡضِ ٱئۡتِیَا طَوۡعًا أَوۡ كَرۡهاً قَالَتَاۤ أَتَیۡنَا طَاۤىِٕعِینَ (١١) فَقَضَىٰهُنَّ سَبۡعَ سَمَـٰوَات فِی یَوۡمَیۡنِ وَأَوۡحَىٰ فِی كُلِّ سَمَاۤءٍ أَمۡرَهَاۚ وَزَیَّنَّا ٱلسَّمَاۤءَ ٱلدُّنۡیَا بِمَصَـٰبِیحَ وَحِفۡظاً ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ تَقۡدِیرُ ٱلۡعَزِیزِ ٱلۡعَلِیمِ (١٢)﴾ [فصلت ٩-١٢] صدق الله العظيم

قال الله: (وَٱلسَّمَاۤءَ بَنَیۡنَـٰهَا بِأَیۡی۟د وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ (٤٧) وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ فَرَشۡنَـٰهَا فَنِعۡمَ ٱلۡمَـٰهِدُونَ (٤٨) وَمِن كُلِّ شَیۡءٍ خَلَقۡنَا زَوۡجَیۡنِ لَعَلَّكُمۡ تَذَكَّرُونَ (٤٩) فَفِرُّوۤا۟ إِلَى ٱللَّهِۖ إِنِّی لَكُم مِّنۡهُ نَذِیر مُّبِین (٥٠) وَلَا تَجۡعَلُوا۟ مَعَ ٱللَّهِ إِلَـٰهًا ءَاخَرَۖ إِنِّی لَكُم مِّنۡهُ نَذِیر مُّبِین (٥١)﴾ [الذاريات ٤٧-٥١] صدق الله العظيم

بنى الله السماء ومقابل هذا فرش الأرض. ثم قال عز وجل (وإنا لموسعون)، وهذا رزق السماء ففيها أرزاق العباد ومنها ينزل الغيث، ومقابل (إنا لموسعون)، يوجد لدينا (فنعم الماهدون)، فهذا يقابل رزق السماء فقد مهد لنا عز وجل الأرض وجعلها قابله للعيش فهي قرار لنا وثبت في الجبال كما تثبت الخيمة في الصحراء فجعلها رَوَاسِي وهذا لكي تثبت الأرض ولاتتحرك بنا. فمن رحمته عز وجل أمسك السماء ورفعها بدون عمد نراه لكي لاتقع على الأرض. فإذا وقعت فإنها تقع عليها كلها (ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِی رَفَعَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ بِغَیۡرِ عَمَد تَرَوۡنَهَاۖ ثُمَّ ٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلۡعَرۡشِۖ وَسَخَّرَ ٱلشَّمۡسَ وَٱلۡقَمَرَۖ كُل یَجۡرِی لِأَجَل  مُّسَمى  یُدَبِّرُ ٱلۡأَمۡرَ یُفَصِّلُ ٱلۡـَٔایَـٰتِ لَعَلَّكُم بِلِقَاۤءِ رَبِّكُمۡ تُوقِنُونَ)، وبهذا يخبرنا عز وجل أن السماء ثابته وكذلك الأرض (۞ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ یُمۡسِكُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ أَن تَزُولَاۚ وَلَىِٕن زَالَتَاۤ إِنۡ أَمۡسَكَهُمَا مِنۡ أَحَد مِّنۢ بَعۡدِهِۦۤۚ إِنَّهُۥ كَانَ حَلِیمًا غَفُورا) صدق الله العظيم

ثم قال الله في سورة الذاريات بعد وصف الأرزاق والنعم للعباد في السماء والأرض : (وَمِن كُلِّ شَیۡءٍ خَلَقۡنَا زَوۡجَیۡنِ لَعَلَّكُمۡ تَذَكَّرُونَ )،فالسماء تقابلها الأرض وهم أزواج (أَوَلَمۡ یَرَ ٱلَّذِینَ كَفَرُوۤا۟ أَنَّ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ كَانَتَا رَتۡقاً فَفَتَقۡنَـٰهُمَاۖ وَجَعَلۡنَا مِنَ ٱلۡمَاۤءِ كُلَّ شَیۡءٍ حَیٍّۚ أَفَلَا یُؤۡمِنُونَ)، فكيف تم تفسير أن الأرض صغيرة وليس عريضة؟

أما بالنسبة الى تفسير (وإنا لموسعون) صدق الله

قال السيوطي: قادرون بقوة

قال السعدي: رزق العباد ويحتمل قول واسعة في أنحائها وأرجائها

قال إبن كثير ناقلاً عن إبن عباس: بقوة وتختص ببناء سقف السماء

قال الله (وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ) قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: لَقَادِرُونَ. وَقِيلَ: أَيْ وَإِنَّا لَذُو سَعَةٍ، وَبِخَلْقِهَا وَخَلْقِ غَيْرِهَا لَا يضيق علينا شي نُرِيدُهُ. وَقِيلَ: أَيْ وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ الرِّزْقَ عَلَى خَلْقِنَا. عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَيْضًا. الْحَسَنُ: وَإِنَّا لَمُطِيقُونَ. وَعَنْهُ أَيْضًا: وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ الرِّزْقَ بِالْمَطَرِ. وَقَالَ الضَّحَّاكُ: أَغْنَيْنَاكُمْ، دَلِيلُهُ: (عَلَى الْمُوسِعِ(١) قَدَرُهُ). وَقَالَ الْقُتَبِيُّ: ذُو سَعَةٍ عَلَى خَلْقِنَا. وَالْمَعْنَى مُتَقَارِبٌ. وَقِيلَ: جَعَلْنَا بَيْنَهُمَا وَبَيْنَ الْأَرْضِ سَعَةً

 

B9B7E15D-66DD-48E6-902D-C846623F627C.jpeg

فكيف يتم تكوين هذه السبع أراضين؟

قال الله (أَلَمۡ تَرَوۡا۟ كَیۡفَ خَلَقَ ٱللَّهُ سَبۡعَ سَمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠ت طِبَاقاً (١٥) وَجَعَلَ ٱلۡقَمَرَ فِیهِنَّ نُورا وَجَعَلَ ٱلشَّمۡسَ سِرَاجاً (١٦) وَٱللَّهُ أَنۢبَتَكُم مِّنَ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ نَبَاتاً (١٧) ثُمَّ یُعِیدُكُمۡ فِیهَا وَیُخۡرِجُكُمۡ إِخۡرَاجاً (١٨) وَٱللَّهُ جَعَلَ لَكُمُ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ بِسَاطاً (١٩) لِّتَسۡلُكُوا۟ مِنۡهَا سُبُلاً فِجَاجاً (٢٠)﴾ [نوح ٥-٢٠] صدق الله العظيم

فالسموات طباقا ( خَلَقَ ٱللَّهُ سَبۡعَ سَمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠ت طِبَاقاً)، ويقابلها الأرض وهي بساطاً ( وَٱللَّهُ جَعَلَ لَكُمُ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ بِسَاطاً)، أي السماء بالطول والأرض بالعرض واحدة عامودية والأخرى أفقية فالأزوج يتشابهون في أمور ويختلفون في أمور أخرى. ولكن بما أنهم أزواج فهذا لا يمنع وجود طبقات في الأرض كذلك ولكنها تميل للبسط وكذلك العكس ففي السماء بسط ولكن الطبقات فيها تبقى العنصر الظاهر. وقد يكون الفرق بينهما هو أن الأراضين متصلة والسموات منفصلة وبهذا وبالرسومات نكون بإذن الله قربنا الصورة لكم. وقال الله أن القمر موجود (فيهن) أي في السبع سموات وهذا دليل على أن القمر موجود في السموات وليس محصوراً فقط في السماء الدنيا. فلندقق في كلمات القرآن لمعرفة المعاني الصحيحة، فطباق يقابلها بساط ولا مجال بعد هذا ان تقول ان بساط تعني رزق

 

4EDE44B2-C1A2-431F-860F-EC070E23C112

الآن بعد كل هذا الوصف، تخيل أنه تم الصعود بنجاح مسافة ١٠٠ كيلومتر عن سطح البحر، ماذا سترى اذا كان هذا الوصف صحيح؟

لنقل أن الصعود كان بعيداً عن مركز الأرض مكة المكرمة، ونأخذ بعين الإعتبار قانون المنظور ووجود القبة حيث انها الفاصل بين كل أرض، هل تعتقد أنك سترى كل الأرض؟ الجواب لا وقد ترى جزء بسيط فقط من الأرض الثانية وستظهر لك منحنية لأن الزجاجة (القبة) وقانون المنظور سيظهر هذا الشكل لك، واذا لم تقتنع بالأحاديث النبوية الموجودة عن القبة، فهي مذكورة نصاً صريحاً في التوراة والإنجيل والذي أخذنا منه تعريف “تسطحها لاينافي كرويتها” وهذا يشمل يابستها ومائها وهوائها اي نقصد القبة وهذة بالتأكيد تأخذ شكل الكرة

 

4CF1DEC2-7A85-460F-8816-7EE33E24D229

فنحن نعلم أن الزجاج يكسر القليل من الصور، ونعلم أنه قد يشتت الضوء أو يجعله ينتشر ولهذا ضرب لنا الله مثل أن المصباح يكون في زجاجة، صحيح أن الآية تتحدث عن الهدى ولكنها أيضاً مثل لكل نور في السموات والأرض. لماذا يقول الله ” السموات والأرض؟ ونحن نعلم أنها أراضين؟ لأن الأراضين متصلة فتكون كالأرض الواحدة والسموات منفصلة

فلنرى هل كان يقصد شيخ الإسلام كل هذا؟ قد يكون وصفة قريب من هذا ماعدى إذا كان يفترض أن الماء منحني ولا أعتقد أنه قال هذا، بل كل كلامة كان رد على الجهمية ويتفق مع قولنا وقول ابن عباس أن للأرض وجه واحد يقابل السماء وأن جهنم في أسفلين في الأرض السابعة

أما بالنسبة لقوله تعالى ( أَفَلَا یَنظُرُونَ إِلَى ٱلۡإِبِلِ كَیۡفَ خُلِقَتۡ (١٧) وَإِلَى ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ كَیۡفَ رُفِعَتۡ (١٨) وَإِلَى ٱلۡجِبَالِ كَیۡفَ نُصِبَتۡ (١٩) وَإِلَى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ كَیۡفَ سُطِحَتۡ)، فهل الأرض الأولى مسطحة؟ الجواب نعم فيقول الله ( یَنظُرُونَ) وكذلك ( خُلِقَتۡ)، فيريدك الله أن تنظر الى خلقه للأبل، ثم لم يذكر في الآية التي تليها ماذا يريدك أن تفعل، فيعود هذا الى ( یَنظُرُونَ) وكذلك ( خُلِقَتۡ) فيريدك الله ان تنظر في كيفية خلقه للسماء فرفعها بغير عَمَد نراه، ثم بعد هذا يريدك ان تنظر الى كيفية نصبه للجبال وكذلك تستطيح الأرض ، فالآيات تتحدث عن خلق الله فسبحان الله من استثنى الأرض من هذا وقال أن سطحت تعني رزق وتسخيرها للإنسان، أما بالنسبة لتسطحها لاينافي كرويتها فشرحنا هذا عدة مرات ولا برهان على هذا القول الا من عند أهل الكتب فقد نقلناه من مئات السنين

1234592C-3B40-4D1A-A3D2-1CC2BB51159A

وأخيراً آية التكوير

قالَ اْللّٰه،. ﴿خَلَقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ بِالْحَقِّ يُكَوِّرُ اللَّيْلَ عَلَى النَّهَارِ وَيُكَوِّرُ النَّهَارَ عَلَى اللَّيْلِ وَسَخَّرَ الشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ كُلٌّ يَجْرِي لِأَجَلٍ مُسَمًّى أَلَا هُوَ الْعَزِيزُ الْغَفَّارُ﴾ [الزمر : 5] صدق الله العظيم

هل ينطبق تكوير الليل والنهار على قبة السماء؟ الجواب نعم اذا كان الإصرار ثابت على قول أن التكوير لايتم الا على مجسم كروي فجو السماء هو المعني من كل هذا التكوير فكيف لنا عدم إعتباره من يتكور عليه الليل والنهار، هو بالفعل هذا مايحصل

ثانياً هل تم ذكر الأرض في آية التكوير أم هو تكوير الليل على النهار والنهار على الليل وليس الليل على الأرض وهكذا

ثالثاً هل تكوير من كوره؟ قال الله ( إِذَا ٱلشَّمۡسُ كُوِّرَتۡ)، فهل هذا يعني أنها ستصبح كوره يوم القيامة أم أنها تتلاشى

رابعاً هل يكمن حصول التكوير على مجسمات غير كروية، الجواب نعم

كان إبن حزم رحمه متأثر بالعلوم الخارجة عن الثقافة الإسلامية ولا نريد الدخول في تفاصيل هذا، ولكن أعطينا تفسير واضح يفسر بعض أقواله

 

وفي الختام نقول رأينا المختصر في الجاذبية، فنحن نرى أن قانون نيوتن وقوانين الكتلة غير صحيحة، ولكن هل تكون الجاذبية مرادفة لكلمة قرار؟ اذا كان هذا صحيح فنعم هناك جاذبية للأرض حيث تستقر عليها كل الأجسام

890E102B-9EC9-4FB8-9DD1-E3CB5FC7E02F

 

فكيف لنا أن نجزم بقول ناسا وننسى قوله تعالى ( ۞ مَّاۤ أَشۡهَدتُّهُمۡ خَلۡقَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَلَا خَلۡقَ أَنفُسِهِمۡ وَمَا كُنتُ مُتَّخِذَ ٱلۡمُضِلِّینَ عَضُدا)، فاعلم كل المكتوب هنا ماهو الا من وحي القرآن

أما من قال بمركزية الشمس، فهذا لانقول عنه الا أن الله ينور طريق من يشاء والحمد لله رب العالمين

Receptors unblocking 4

How do we think? One of the outcomes of postmodernism is adapting the idea of neglecting the things we don’t understand. This is the denial of what is beyond nature and perhaps expressed throughout arts or fake imagination. And nature according to someone is different than how it was defined based on the perception of someone else. So, let’s try to fix the drawbacks. Being straight forward Is a way of life, and we are coming with good intentions, clear from the manipulative acts of the medieval artist. So do we think by the brain only? Or do we think by the heart? Or both? Is it one for the logic, and the other one senses. Yeah that is something beyond what we call science because it relates to the energy of the soul. But how do we ignore all of this and there is a fact that tells us that souls take part of 50% of the human body? Is it because of faith? We don’t have faith? Why we are limited? Understand that our thinking system contains the heart, brain and the nervous system. This system needs some inputs so it starts working. The input we get is through our eyes, ears or by touch and so on. This is the beginners system. The soul in this is a vehicle of correctness that bring extra information to the body from above. Does everyone know how to utilize their soul power? Does this work automatically? No, you need to get closer to God. No one knows the behavior of the souls and how this process works. What we know is what God has told us. For example, we know that souls travel from the body while we sleep. The soul comes with an information to feed the brain. It’s not a part of the thinking system but it’s guidance to tell us where to start with high accuracy. So this is somehow similar to the emotional intelligence that lately it’s becoming an important subject. However, emotional intelligence is way behind when the discussion turn to be about the soul. This system of thinking is the system that the God blessed the prophets with

To bow down in adoration to God is one of the secrets that few may understand its benefits. Continues pressure on the forelock allows certain frequencies to change the shape of the water molecules in our bodies. This is one of the keys to activate the magic wanders of the brain. Advanced chines Buddhists know this clearly as they keep inventing new Yoga movement to unlock this kind of power. They believe that the frequency is the most important factor in this kind of ritual. This explains the nature of sounds we hear when visiting a Buddhists temples. In a beautiful information exchange with one Buddhist, he stated that saying” no one but God” in Arabic has the highest frequency that instantly change the water shape in the body. This is indeed true. Bad words and noise change the water shape also. However, there is no point of applying this kind of praying for the wrong God. You get a clear mind and other benefits indeed but you will not be able to feed the Pineal Gland with energy. You will get some energy, but not the kind that make you fly. There is one God only. He sends one manual at a time. One people fail, he sends a different manual saying the same story, voiding the old manual with a more detailed replacement. After all, God is giver and he sends blessings even if someone disbelieves. He protects us even if don’t worship him the right way

We gave a simple explanation on how souls work. Only from what we know through understanding the holy books, and by experience. We added the knowledge about pineal gland as it exists near the forelock. Previous scholars stated that the pineal gland is linked our souls and it is responsible to unleash special abilities. We know from god that such process happens in the forelock. Scholars did conclude that the pineal gland exist close to the ear and here was the match. However, this small piece of information can’t hold a full accuracy as humans do mistakes. Thus, we included the idea of the existence of the pineal gland just to state the fact clearly. Whether it is there or not, this won’t change the mechanism of the body and soul. We can learn from this how dreams work. As well as visions. We sleep, the soul rise to the sky, it gets messages, turns back with a dream, or if god wanted to match this message to reality, you see it while awake as a vision. We are just a mini simplified models unlike the prophets. Prophets are supported by the power of the Holy Spirit. They indeed have a bigger responsibility and message to send. They warn the people about Judgment day. They tell us that there is only one God, not a person, has no father and no son. All the prophets did deliver the same exact message. Noah, and only few believed him. Ibrahim and Joseph and their powers were within their dreams and visions. Moses, the only one who talked to God. Jesus and Mohammed and both had the Holy Spirit connected within their hearts. The Holy Spirit is an angel. He can reshape him self as a human, or he can connects directly to the hearts of the prophets. In the case of prophet Mohammed, he saw him twice with his original creation. As for Jesus, he was supported mostly also. And Jesus is a way to learn about judgement day. All these prophets and others we did not mention were just sent to tell no one but God who is believing ? They were all Muslims and Islam means saying no one but God. I understand that you may follow a different belief so let’s not consider ourselves as enemies as the love and respect are what matters. This is the truth to my eyes, just keep it in mind

Receptors unblocking 2

Don’t grow up, it’s a trap. What you really need to do is to take this statement academically. How can we we maintain this same clear mind, with a better balance in our hormones until an older age. Let’s provide some assumptions: negative frequencies are one of the key damagers to our brains. Food is another thing. Water and Sound too. visuals and information as well. Of course we are talking about the misuse of things, and the wrong creations in the first place. Yes some new technologies were nothing but an indicator of a lack of knowledge. So what if we were raised having a cell phone from an early age, eating microwave food, and everything that prevent this advancement to happen? is there a way to fix all of this? They say it’s never too late, but only if you exclude destructive minds and companies from the picture. Consider the Facebook group as one of the first candidates

When targeting a tech giant such as Facebook, understand that Facebook is different than any other social media platform. Indeed the damages of theses technologies ( all social media sites) to mankind is clear. The major purpose of creating the internet is to share information between the people, not to share their privacy to create weapons of the future. This is a fact. Social anxiety and disruption is what we earned through using these sites. We target Facebook not for all of that, but we have doubts about the integrity of the company. Just count the number of lawsuits against them. Analyze how they break the law and always tweak their way to be on the safe side. Who is funding them? Where does their money go? If you care about the future of you children, you should demand for a change, and start with turning technologies into tangible systems created by those with higher ethical values

Banning Flat earth content

In the case of banning flat earth content, note that this decision contradicts with the freedom of speech a brings many questions and doubts about the intentions.

8A9F1D8E-FA7D-4717-9E6B-D78D2AE52FEA

What’s in the media is not like what’s in the reports and documentations. The government knows this by heart and if they are responsible for this decision, wisely they should pull it back, or if it’s a decision through the tech companies, the government should command them to pull back.

3E0CC553-7128-42CA-9901-8E51BCF9B034

THIS IS A LOSING CASE FOR THOSE WHO BANNED FLAT EARTH CONTENT. IMAGINE THIS GOES TO COURT? Not because flat erathers are right, it’s because the law is clear.

97D33BED-A048-4486-93E0-A17BDE7FE86C

Plus, many government documentations prove that there are questions about the shape of the earth.

CE7FDA7D-5117-4BC5-A077-70B8089E61A5

We do share YouTube videos about flat earth. We had (my group) almost 10 YouTube channels. Two of them were blocked last year. We do not offend anyone but we do the correct interpretation of what’s in the Quran and the Bible.

763EF6DF-BE3B-4F41-8F2D-8EE43423BCEA

As the shape of earth, skies and the heavens were described clearly in the holy books, with no contradictions whatsoever, there must be a reason that they are mentioned there right? And that is to believe in God’s words.

Albert Einstein Quotes About Religion and Science

Atheists and rigid scientists say that the separation between science and religion is must as religion is not a science book. Well, this is a new conclusion to mankind has no roots. God, the one who created earth, and created the humans, is the only one capable of describing the things we can’t understand such as the creation of 7 earths and the 7 skies. Accept our apology if we say that this separation is ignorance.

FC045DC0-34A3-40ED-945D-C02D791131E3

We also talk about the Flat Earth that came from the Hebrew translations too.

A68BCB55-2D89-42AE-8A92-F2625E629934

 

what a firmament is? It is not the air. Perhaps the celestial sphere, the empyrean, the welkin. It’s this ball that made you think earth is a ball, but put in mind that the meaning includes the land, water and air of the earth and this makes the ball.

92A68067-3C6D-4D7E-875D-E55648A1C727

 

However, the Bible states clearly the edges story and “the spread out” which is an incorrect translation. You can find this same translation in the English version of the Quran. Muslim scholars did copy this same incorrect definition of the earth, and interpreted it for the Quran somehow. Those were new age scholars who had this opinion and left the direct exact words of God.

so what brought the concept of Heliocentrism to the world except the ritual of solar deity?

BD3664AB-E013-4EA7-8B9E-9970B27D4E1C9AB6F342-328C-4941-B226-869DBD0A03D4DD738CC8-CBD3-443C-B4B2-F4AB73CFF280

And why can’t we accept that people make mistakes and not every theory is correct?

 

 

5C4C656F-B167-4EED-899A-F67C2ECC1216F8D61ABB-1A27-4B12-83D6-7BB577B623CFBF7CC498-C201-4DB2-9CFB-E36AF83A6870600B0B69-8785-4B34-9144-856B339F327D

And here are some links that explain this

The Bible 1

All the holy books

The Bible 2

 

If you block videos that talk about religious beliefs that don’t harm, we will consider this as an insult to religion and a block of the truth. WITH THIS, YOU ARE PREVENTING PEOPLE FROM PRACTICING RELIGION, AND STOPPING THEM TO SPREAD THEIR BELIEFS.

A8CADE0A-3591-4A57-A4CB-67D1535D569B

 

We study the law carefully unlike the acts of ban appearing lately. Proton mail which is an encrypted mail service by CERN, are aware of better laws of the internet that Google and Facebook don’t. Their system is connected to a certain court which will limit the capabilities of the end user to claim against them. YouTube and Facebook don’t have that and there is a massive number of flatearthers who can claim claim against the ban in different courts from different areas of the world. So, the challenge for you is: can you stop the truth from spreading ?

92FAD7A3-FA77-46C8-8B76-F3CC059D9E194C0BFF61-402F-42FF-82D7-45FB1FE82273FE3ACD02-C035-4357-A5AA-0B54BAFB5D0C5905A05A-6A95-4B2B-8929-F0AF8CCE6217AFF01605-4EB7-4E9D-85EE-FDD00B60184AB4D66306-8F2F-461A-93D7-5F4E3C5F0F30B3241CCD-4FB1-4D0F-A849-17D5087116B117CA1ED1-9A1C-430A-B42E-462C1E98972EBE162037-1159-40A7-B1E8-68EE2BBF29AA70C69FF0-0B4A-46E5-85D8-A64E322AE26E

 

 

 

The space invaders and the future of text

The relationship between technology and place can be a key concept that perhaps will assist to conduct a successful investigation leading to invent better technologies.  As Marshal Mucluhan referred to technology as it is an extinction of the body and the mind, arguing that television consumption led to transform our perceptual systems and thinking (1994), many digital thinkers believed that Mcluhan’s concept of perception applies to the digital technologies of today (Bolteret al.2013). However, the complex characteristics of the emerging technologies, and their rapid growth, may require further serious research and experimentations in the field of media understanding and aesthetics. As a result of the new identities in the features within modern day technologies,  Bolter, Engberg and Maclntyre argued that media aesthetics are not singular as Macluhan suggested, this is because users are not passive anymore (2013). Far apart from the relationship between the television and their audiences, today’s technologies rely on the participation of the individual to create, design, and share the environment (Bolteret al.2013). This feedback circle that the users experience emphasizes on the the importance of redefining our understanding  of how we perceive our environment through technology (Bolteret al.2013). Thus, creating the technologies of tomorrow requires a clear understanding of the effects of modern day technologies, and how they are designed and for what purpose. A great question that may arise is about the level of participation of the individual in the creation and design of the environment through technology. One gateway to understand technologies is to consider the study of place. Before this study introduces place. Place can be computational or natural (Harrison and Dourish 1996). In this study, I will argue that the technology that incorporates the use of natural place is a key to provide a better safe life for our future generation.

Important concepts and movements have emphasized that the physical space is a source of disturbance and it is senseless. The ideas that ensured that reality should be vague and hidden within our output through a selection of information from the past (Manovich 2002, Smith 2003, SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009, Armitage 2015, Kozíket al.2015). This is to discuss postmodernism and what relates to it. Postmodernism served well in the account of philosophy, literature, film, and arts (SHEEHAN and 2004). Perhaps, it also supported the growth of both fields of the interactive arts and net arts (Manovich 2002, Lim and Yoo 2014). This includes the studies that confirmed the connection between new media and postmodernism (Rohle 2005). However, I believe that the relationship between new media and postmodernism should be different. To understand postmodernism, it is crucial to investigate modernity, a movement that died but its roots maintained. Modernity is the “modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence. This associates modernity with a time period and with an initial geographical location, but for the moment leaves its major characteristics safely stowed away in a black box” (Giddens 1967, p.1). Anthony Giddens, in his book the consequences of modernity, emphasized that one of the features of modernity is the separation between time and space (1967). Indeed, this leads to the expansion of knowledge and information, but also weakens our perception of understanding science (Giddens 1967). Similarly, postmodernism is a movement of arts that has been evolved over the years. “Post-modernism, if it means anything, is best kept to refer to styles or movements within literature, painting, the plastic arts, and architecture. It concerns aspects of aesthetic reflection upon the nature of modernity” (Giddens 1967, p.45).  A vast number of studies have included that postmodernism should be replaced, already has been replaced, or it just needs enhancements (SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009).  For example, the works of  Alan Kirby illustrated how new technologies replaced postmodernism in to what is called digimodernism, which reconfigured our culture (Kirby 2009). Some studies indicated that the movement reached its strength between the 1970s and 1980s, and started to slow down in the 1990s (SHEEHAN and 2004). However, the influence of postmodernism remained clear in the works of many recent new media studies such as (Rohle 2005, Manovich 2013). Let me paraphrase my argument to make it clear, I am arguing that the new media should not only aim to teach us how to have certain visual skills, but also we should learn from it how to build things. Familiarizing the physical space. New media is not only for relocating icons and symbols on the computer screen. This new pattern requires a different kind of knowledge. A knowledge that equals the visual space with reality. The question is: How can children learn the real science through modern day technologies ? Thus, the heart of this argument relies on understanding the importance of the natural place, nature, or reality in our visualization of computer imagery.

Lee Manovich in his book the language of new media, convincingly explained the intimate relationship between the software operations and postmodernism (2002). Stated “the practice of putting together a media object from already existing and commercially distributed media elements already existed with old media, but new media technology further standardizes it and makes it much easier to perform. What before involved scissors and glue now involves simply clicking on cut and paste. And, by encoding the operations of selection and combination into the very interfaces of authoring and editing software, new media legitimizes them. Pulling elements from databases and libraries becomes the default; creating them from scratch becomes an exception” (Manovich 2002, p.130). Also, “It is not accidental that the development of GUI which legitimized “cut and paste” logic as well as media manipulation software such as Photoshop, which popularized plug-in architecture, took place during the 1980s — the same decade when contemporary culture became post-modern.” (Manovich 2002, p.130).  From Manovich’s book, Fredric Jameson  stated “Rather than assembling more media recordings of reality, culture is now busy re-working, recombining and analyzing the already accumulated media material” (2002, p.131). This supports the concept of Manovich in which that the software “made postmodernism possible” (2002, p.131). Furthermore, in the brilliant work of Dziga Vertov, in the definition of modernization, the physical space was expressed  as a source of disruption (Manovich 2002). The ability to simulate old media in a computer, that later can be easily shared over networks, that what Manovich was discussing, considered the computer as a metamedium that enables other software mediums to take commands, and combine various media forms in one place, which form the concept of software hybridization (2013). The ideas of Manovich serve well in seeking the answer to the question of the level of the individual participation in the design and the creation of the environment. However, Manovich is a new media artist, designer, animator, programmer, and a film theorist (2002). Thus, the spirit of his works is based on his perception of the software environment, and arts. If there is a discussion about place in Manovich’s books, it is from a computational point of view such as his discussion about the GIS systems. The idea is that the software is taking the command in which software becomes a replacement of a large array of ancient physical, mechanical, and electronic technologies to create  new interfaces that interact with cultural artefacts (Manovich 2013). Monovich considered the hardware as a support that enhances our creations in the virtual space (Manovich 2013). For example, the mouse, the keyboard, or even the laptop are just tools to assist us in working in the virtual interface. Indeed the software is taking command, but an interesting question that I may seek to answer, what is the role of the hardware environment in the rapid revolution of the science of artificial intelligence, and materiality interactions? As it is already evolving. “The cost and complexity of hardware-centric systems can often be reduced by using software to perform tasks which don’t appear on the critical path. Alternately, the performance of software can sometimes be improved by using special purpose hardware to implement tasks which do appear on the critical path. Whatever the motivation, most modern systems are composed of both hardware and software components. Given the importance of the connection between hardware and software in these systems, it is surprising how little automated and machine-checkable support there is for co-design space exploration” (Kinget al.2015, p.1). The study aimed to limit the gap between hardware and software to enable the developers to create rapid systems (Kinget al.2015).  There are different possibilities on the consequences of the next generation hardware development. In some areas where solar energy takes place, the nature is the source that makes a system work, rather than electricity. MIT professor Vladimir Bulović, researched the numerous opportunities in the developments of nanotechnology and solar energy that may rise the technology into a whole new level (MOCHARI 2015). What I am trying to reach here is that there will be a time where   humans will be able to learn, design, create arts, and construct in a different way using hardware technologies and other physical devices. As an initial point, the semiotic language within a computer screen, should find a good start to live outside the digital box, or the computer. For example, the hologram of no goggles and peripherals.

Indeed, postmodernism is important. The positive value of pluralism is clear. Through the important role of “radical pluralism in democracy, tolerance and diversity”, it supported the practice of the “freedom of expression” (Kozíket al.2015, p.119). The way that postmodernism symbolically represents the world have opened the gates into a new kind of knowledge (Kozíket al.2015). The question is: will this kind of knowledge survive with the future technologies? will it survive the new evolution of mankind?   The best definition that explains the use of postmodernism in the computer might be: “that condition in which for the first time, and as a result of technologies that allow large-scale storage, access, and reproduction of records of the past, the past appears to be included in the present, or at the present’s disposal, and in which the ratio between present and past has therefore changed” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.10). Postmodernism is the base that formed the arts and literature of today (Giddens 1967, SHEEHAN and 2004).The trustful manipulation in the artefacts is what made this argument possible. According to  Manovich, the cut and paste is indeed related to postmodernism (Manovich 2002, p.131). The cut and the paste are the reasons of how I quoted Manovich extensively to argue that machines should connect to reality. It is the cut and paste that made me a computer programmer. In my masters at California Sate University East Bay, me and my partner Jeff Stott have created an interactive multimedia installation that uses the human brain to generate audiovisual content. Part of my duties was to design a patch in Max Msp to use it as a processing hub to connect all the sensors to the physical interface that we have designed. In this stage, I confirm that my study of computer science, and my few experiences in computer programming did not serve well. However, I was confident as the nature in the “automation” of new media, enables the user to become a co-author (Manovich 2002). Using the Max tutorials, manuals, and code examples – provided a complete source for constructing a Max patch. As well the user generated patches that are available on the web. Thus, this little previous knowledge in computer programming, with understanding the interactive culture and the internet, and of course the cut and paste, is what made the job done by the end of the day. Thus, we can confirm that manipulation plays a major role in the world of postmodernism.

However, manipulation is great but not in every context. The literature is trustful. This dose not mean that manipulation in real life, or in the computer is always a positive thing. In fact, when some one claims that another person manipulated him, this mainly understood as a negative situation. This kind of manipulation implies negativity, and   needs explanation to change its meaning. This is the case when the murderer commits his crime, and his lawyer makes him innocent in the eyes of the judges. In terms of computers, it is true that the internet resulted to improve the intellectual work, opportunities, and cultural change, but perhaps the artificial environment of the internet is problematic (Kozíket al.2015). Problems such as allowing the inability to distinguish between reality and virtually (Kozíket al.2015). As a consequence, it became the gateway to identity manipulation. As a result of anonymity, the internet became a great opportunity for cyber crimes with all of its kinds (Glaseret al.2002). As mentioning the benefits of the cut and paste, It is also worth to mention that it is a major contributor in the world of plagiarism. Alastair Pennycook, in his publication: “Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism” under the subject “Postmodern Uncertainty: The Death of the Author” he stated : “the notion of the author and individual creativity, and this argument that meanings are in a sense in circulation, that language is constantly cycled and recycled, raise profound questions about how we consider the notion of textual borrowing or plagiarism” (Pennycook 1996, p.211). Or in other words, postmodernism made plagiarism simple. As a result, the internet of today plays a major cause in increasing plagiarism (Howard 2007). As the conclusion of understanding how the relationship between computer texts and reality, a suggestion to avoid plagiarism is that computer texts should be more clever and connect more to reality by shifting its properties. As text should have the ability to recognise the users by the computer cameras and incorporate an automation of a plagiarism system that auto detects and auto blocks. The detection in real time by connecting the text to the physical space, or to reality is a clear suggestion. This is not an invasion of privacy. The ultimate invasion is caused by the advance in the information technology and specifically over the internet (A¨ımeur and Sch˝onfeld 2011).

This argument is all about proving that the physical space, nature, and reality will have an added value to the improvement of  new media. Thus, the aim in this argument is to trace the reasons of the exclusion of reality and space, and to prove their added value in our creation.  Paul Virilio’s views are concerned with the interaction of the human consequences with the disturbance of the physical space (Armitage 2015). Paul Virilio was a prisoner of war, and his theories basically were an escape from reality (Armitage 2015). “Virilio is the last endist, recuperating the most abiding concern of philosophical postmodernism, even as he shows its ominous determinations and potentially hazardous consequences for life in the twenty-first century (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.38). The problem in excluding the nature in the way we collect our information may result in accruing generalized knowledge only (Giddens 1967). The consequence of polarity is that it changed the ratio between the past and the present, which almost they become the same (SHEEHAN and 2004). Which made “The present of postmodernism has come to seem like a stalled present, an agitated but idle meanwhile” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.11). “The post-modern outlook sees a plurality of heterogeneous claims to knowledge, in which science does not have a privileged place” (Giddens 1967, p.2).  “The modern mind assumed that it knew more than its predecessors because the natural and historical science were flooding it with new knowledge about nature and history, the postmodern mind argues (paradoxically) that it knows more than others did because it has discovered how little the human mind can know” (Smith 2003, p.loc 108). “If modern physics showed us a world at odds with our senses, postmodern physics is showing us one which is at odds with our imagination, where imagination is taken as imagery” (Smith 2003, p.loc 231).This explains the death of the philosophy  of the metaphysics (Smith 2003). “Leonardo da Vinci is symbolic. His anatomical studies and drawings in general disclose a direction of interest that has turned eye into camera, in his case an extraordinary camera that could stop the hawk in flight and fix the rearing steed. Once again humankind was attending to nature’s details as a potential messenger of meaning” (Smith 2003, p.loc 207).

The existence of the technology of today is a result of the great inventions from the western culture. The western inventions are the reason behind making the algorithms of Mohammed Al Khawarzmi alive. Dennis Ritchie the inventor of the C programming language, Seymour Papert the inventor of the logo language and the mechanical turtle, David Liddle the lead developer of the star system, Bill gates and his windows, Tim Berners Lee, the creator of the world wide web and the founder of the w3schools and so on. These inventions have shaped our lives. However, it is crucial for this context to mention those who think beyond nature. The different ways of thinking of Newton, Einstein, And Hawking is what led to their discoveries. It’s simply thinking about time and space from a different perspective (Hawking 1988, Lorentz 2014). In Google’s Zeitgeist conference, Hawking stated “Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics” and declared that philosophers and their arts are dead (Warman 2011). With this, we showed both extreme perspectives, the ones that support the arts, and the other that support science. I believe a middle ground will lead to a better future. Somewhere in the middle where this fusion collides to build a generation that understands the arts and science at the same time, forming a new identity of the individual. This will not be achieved by learning in schools, it should be gained from our daily technology consumption. Thus, Technology should behave differently. A question that may arise: Applied science and engineering schools do exist. Therefore, what is the reason of arguing about postmodernism? The answer is because the aim here is to build a medium that enable the next generation to learn arts and science from every day life. A life long learning game or a device for example.  A product of a new new media technology that incorporates text, images and sound . A new media that has a different identity that respects the arts and science. I believe, postmodernism is  a great symbol of arts and literature, and thus, it should not be excluded, but not giving it too much of attention because science, as Hawking believes is the future. Furthermore, I believe science with no meaning is simply worthless. Science should be hidden within our digital interfaces, and not any interface, an interface that combines reality with imagination. The previous studies that discussed the problems in the inability to distinguish between reality and imagination, this inability can be unitized for a positive cause. A generation that is in control of their magic circle.There is so much to discover in nature, and if we only keep remixing the past, we might not be able to follow up with the future technologies. One of the attributes that makes a technology emerging is the uncertainty and ambiguity (Rotoloet al.2015). Then, this defines the interest of the artist in the technology.  According to the postmodernism thoughts, humans are able to learn through imagination. Learning of course will be achieved but to a certain extent. A future artist should be able to design his/her interactive art installation with the deeper understanding of  physics, dynamics, and programming codes of his/her creation. Thus, the suggestion is a fusion of balanced science and arts in an interesting way. Which provides a true situated meaning to a clear scientific knowledge.  Can  games do this?