A solar deity

What is the origin of the globe theory?


This article does not intend to find the truth about  moon landing stories or to ensure that NASA already knows that earth is flat, as a massive number of investigations were already made and found that there are political agendas behind all of this. Also, it’s known that hiding the truth about the shape of the earth enforces the idea that promotes science over religion.



This article aims to provide a brief about  the root of all the theories that NASA relied on, and successfully turned them into facts by applying state of art manipulations, supported with big budgets and massive media coverage.



Let’s copy some definitions from Wikipedia. 

A solar deity (also sun god or sun goddess) is a sky deity who represents the Sun, or an aspect of it, usually by its perceived power and strength. Solar deities and sun worship can be found throughout most of recorded history in various forms. The Sun is sometimes referred to by its Latin name Sol or by its Greek name Helios. 

Heliocentrism is the astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the center of the Solar System. Historically, heliocentrism was opposed to geocentrism, which placed the Earth at the center. The notion that the Earth revolves around the Sun had been proposed as early as the 3rd century BC by Aristarchus of Samos, but at least in the medieval world, Aristarchus’s heliocentrism attracted little attention—possibly because of the loss of scientific works of the Hellenistic Era.



Nicolaus Copernicus was a Renaissance-era mathematician and astronomer who formulated a model of the universe that placed the Sun rather than the Earth at the center of the universe, in all likelihood independently of Aristarchus of Samos, who had formulated such a model some earlier.



Indeed there is a great link between worshiping the sun, Heliocentrism, and the revolution of Copernicus. It’s claimed that Heliocentrism is based on the knowledge of mathematics, observation and astronomy. Let’s look into those who adopted this idea to find that they all have one thing in common. They are all anti religion people and philosophers. Not scientist even it was claimed that they are.   In the era of  Nikolaus Copernicus, the technologies wasn’t available as it’s now, to let some one assume that the earth is a globe. Until this day we don’t have the technology that can assure that the shape of the earth is spherical. The only proofs that tells us about the sky and the earth are the books of God. All the books of God agreed that the earth is flat. People who have different religious perspectives such as Copernicus will indeed work hard to bring everyone to their beliefs. As worshipping the sun was dominant by the age of Copernicus, and the books of God indeed contradicts with the life style that he dreamed of, indeed there is a motivation to promote Heliocentrism. This exactly what is happening today. How can they allow gay marriage? Abortion? Cloning? and endless things. The only way is to drive people away from religion and this space earth conspiracy is one of them. Not to mention the hidden agendas because of the North Pole secrets and the military reputation and power. 



Contrary to popular belief, the Church accepted Copernicus’ heliocentric theory before a wave of Protestant opposition led the Church to ban Copernican views in the 17th century. 


The creator has informed us about those who treated the sun as God. Others did the same with the moon.  The reasons that caused people to think that the Sun or the moon may be a God is based on the belief that they affect humans when they appear. Some believed that they come to us, others believed that we go to them. This kind of religion appeared in Arabia in the pre Islamic era, the Pherons, Romans, Buddhists, and other cultures. Notice that the spread of this belief  was on an individual scale, or a small group and has never been generalised



Therefore, as a fear that this concept of Heliocentrism goes away and gets destroyed by the truth seekers, the soldiers of the devil worked hard to protect the belief in every low way that they can do. Know that part of the zaionist protocols states that the Jews are the royal people of the earth and their blood should only remain, and other religions must vanish. They did that in the American system where they destroy the image and reputation of the Christianity. They do the same with Islam and 9/11 is a great proof. Those who established NASA, were all academics, business and political people from Israel. You can check the records for this. The invention of the “grays” is nothing but to hide how voodoo is made. So, what is the purpose behind creating NASA? Yes there is research and that’s part of the plan. Otherwise how do they get credibility?  NASA is a military weapon and religion killer. 



Finally, what they taught us in schools was nothing but a brain wash, and learning the lie from an early age makes it reality. Even in the media. What is the purpose of creating a show such as the teletabbies? Strange creatures that interact with the sun. Making the sun interactive is nothing but a promotion for the Heliocentrism. Yet it is another brain wash, but think, are you a teletubby? 







More space agencies


The European Space Agency plans to start mining for natural resources on the moon. It’s not strange to even see the whole world planning for envading the moon. Even with denying the fact that we have no enough info about the moon, and still in denial about all the moon landing stories. God has given us enough information to start with. The moon moves up and down and orbits earth. When it reaches the 4th sky, this is hard to reach but in your dreams. When it’s close, earth boundaries prevents us from going there. So why don’t we wake up and find another political strategy to gain power?

If the European space agency decides to prove that its impossible to reach the moon, this will provide a strength and a respect more than saying “we went to moon”. The smell of the moon landing lie by the US and China is spreading everywhere. Prove the lie and you will dominate. If you prove their lies, Russia will do the same and China will pull back and the US will remain the idiot of all times.

Traveling to space is a story of faith

Here is a short story. We can’t leave earth. Unless we are blessed and permitted to do so. You can’t do this by science and power. You need this good relationship with the creator in order to do so. Traveling to the sky (space) is a story of faith. The one who created you and create this whole universe, said that sky gates will never be opened for non believers. Know that the ones who did this were mostly prophets. So it is sky gates and the sky wall (roof) will never be crossed. So why making yourself the idiot of the galaxy? There is a convincing scientific answer. However, answers from the holy books are more solid. Think twice on how satellites were made and where they are located.

لا يوجد فضاء ولم نصعد للقمر ولا يوجد اقمار

لا يوجد فضاء ولم نصعد للقمر ولا يوجد اقمار

إختلافي والكثير معي مع من يدعي الوصول لأعلى مستوى في العلوم الطبيعية يكمن في إمكانية صعود الإنسان وحتى الجان الى السماء. وكما ذكرنا مسبقاً انه لايوجد فضاء وهو الفراغ الذي لايحتوي على ماء ويكون معدوم الجاذبية علماً بأن مصطلح جاذبية لاأصل له. بل هناك سماء كما ذكر الله في كتابة وان فيها ماء (ٱلَّذِی جَعَلَ لَكُمُ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ فِرَ ٰ⁠شا وَٱلسَّمَاۤءَ بِنَاۤءࣰ وَأَنزَلَ مِنَ ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ مَاۤءࣰ فَأَخۡرَجَ بِهِۦ مِنَ ٱلثَّمَرَ ٰ⁠تِ رِزۡقا لَّكُمۡۖ فَلَا تَجۡعَلُوا۟ لِلَّهِ أَندَادࣰا وَأَنتُمۡ تَعۡلَمُونَ). لاتبديل لكلام الله وهذا خلقه فلك ان تختار في ان تصدق كلام الله أم تصديق من يسمونهم علماء وهم في الحقيقة ملحدون من حزب الشيطان ( لَهُمُ ٱلۡبُشۡرَىٰ فِی ٱلۡحَیَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡیَا وَفِی ٱلۡـَٔاخِرَةِۚ لَا تَبۡدِیلَ لِكَلِمَـٰتِ ٱللَّهِۚ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ هُوَ ٱلۡفَوۡزُ ٱلۡعَظِیمُ)، وهم لم يبدلوا كلام الله هنا فقط، بل ايضاً خلقه وهذا واضح من تعريفهم النظري للكون ( وَلَأُضِلَّنَّهُمۡ وَلَأُمَنِّیَنَّهُمۡ وَلَـَٔامُرَنَّهُمۡ فَلَیُبَتِّكُنَّ ءَاذَانَ ٱلۡأَنۡعَـٰمِ وَلَآمُرَنَّهُمۡ فَلَیُغَیِّرُنَّ خَلۡقَ ٱللَّهِۚ وَمَن یَتَّخِذِ ٱلشَّیۡطَـٰنَ وَلِیّا مِّن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ فَقَدۡ خَسِرَ خُسۡرَانࣰا مُّبِینا)، فأصبحت الشمس مركزاً للكون تدور حولها الكواكب وهذا يشمل الأرض التي اعتبروها كوكباً مثله مثل أي كوكب آخر لكنه يحتوي على ماء تصديقاً بنظرية اننا نقطة لاقيمة لها من الكون الوسيع. اعلم ان الغرض من هذة المقاله هو ليس فقط إظهار الحق بل ايضاً للتعمق والتفكر في خلق الله وكلامه. فليكن هذا منطلقاً لك لتتصور الفكرة وتصل للبرهان الذي غفل عنه الكثير.

قال الله: (والسماء ذات البروج)، والسماء من غير السين ماء، ينزل منها ويستقر فيها. فعرش الرحمن يستوي على الماء، والماء ينهمر من السماء على الأرض. والسماء تعلوا الأرض وهي فوقها بعامودية، واذا كانت الارض كروية، فقوله تعالى اذا لاينطبق على هذا الوصف ( اللَّهُ الَّذِي رَفَعَ السَّمَاوَاتِ بِغَيْرِ عَمَدٍ تَرَوْنَهَا ۖ ثُمَّ اسْتَوَىٰ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ ۖ وَسَخَّرَ الشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ ۖ كُلٌّ يَجْرِي لِأَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى ۚ يُدَبِّرُ الْأَمْرَ يُفَصِّلُ الْآيَاتِ لَعَلَّكُم بِلِقَاءِ رَبِّكُمْ تُوقِنُونَ) كلام بسيط عقدوه. فما نرى من سحب، هذا لايشمل السماء، هذا يسمى بمجال الارض. قال الله:    (إِنَّ فِي خَلْقِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَاخْتِلَافِ اللَّيْلِ وَالنَّهَارِ وَالْفُلْكِ الَّتِي تَجْرِي فِي الْبَحْرِ بِمَا يَنفَعُ النَّاسَ وَمَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ مِن مَّاءٍ فَأَحْيَا بِهِ الْأَرْضَ بَعْدَ مَوْتِهَا وَبَثَّ فِيهَا مِن كُلِّ دَابَّةٍ وَتَصْرِيفِ الرِّيَاحِ وَالسَّحَابِ الْمُسَخَّرِ بَيْنَ السَّمَاءِ وَالْأَرْضِ لَآيَاتٍ لِّقَوْمٍ يَعْقِلُونَ) صدق الله العظيم

انظر ماذا يقول الله (والسحاب المسخر بين السماء والارض) ، ماذا يوجد بين السماء والأرض؟ خلق الله الارض وكانت السماء دخان متقاربة مع الأرض، فرفع السماء من غير عمد وجعل لها سقف محفوظ يحفظها من الوقوع، ويمنع الدخول والخروج، فالآن تعلم وعلى يقين ان السحب موجودة في مجال الأرض وليس في السماء، ففصل الله الارض عن السماء، بما يسمى بالهواء(نوع آخر من الماء يكثر فيه الأكسجين )، وفيه توجد السحب وفيه توجد ماتسمى بالأقمار الصناعية التي لا تسبح بل تسقط، وفيه حصلت كذبة التاريخ، تصوير جزء من الارض وتقعير الصورة ثم جعلها كروية، ومافوق سقف السماء، نوع آخر من انواع الماء، وأهل السماء هم اهل السماء، ولايسمح لإنس ولا جان الصعود الا باذن الله، و لا يصعد الى السماء  الا الرسل والانبياء ومن اختار الله، ومن لا يُؤْمِن ولا يستقيم لاتفتح له أبواب السماء كما ذكر الله في سورة الاعراف، ومايريده الملحدون هو إثبات انهم قادرون على فهم كل ماخلقه الله، بل وصنع مثله وانه اذا صعد محمد الى السماء، فإننا نستطيع هذا ايضاً، فانظر الى هذا المعتقد وفكر فيه بعمق. اذا سألت احدهم عنه اليوم فقد يقول لك لا ليس هذا هو المقصد وبالفعل قد يكون هو لايعلم فعلاً بهذا، لانه معتقد توارثته الأجيال عبر الزمن.

قال الله (أَوَلَمْ يَرَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَنَّ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ كَانَتَا رَتْقًا فَفَتَقْنَاهُمَا ۖ وَجَعَلْنَا مِنَ الْمَاءِ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ حَيٍّ ۖ أَفَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ)،  فالسماء وأفلاكها ومافيها مخلوقات حية، وفيها ماء، وقال الله ( وَهُوَ الَّذِي خَلَقَ اللَّيْلَ وَالنَّهَارَ وَالشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ ۖ كُلٌّ فِي فَلَكٍ يَسْبَحُونَ)، فصفة السباحة توحي لك ان الشمس والقمر يسبحون مثل السمك في الماء، لان مداراتها مخلوقة من ماء. وصفه الفتق والرتق للسماء والأرض كما ذكرنا مسبقا ان اغلب علماء التفسير ذكروا انها تختص بنزول المطر وإنبات النبات من الأرض كما انها قد تشمل بداية خلق السموات والأرض، وذكر البعض انها قد تنطبق على الآخرة وهذا اذا قلنا ان كلمة (فتق) تعادل كلمة (إنشقاق) ولكني أرى ان الإنشقاق اعظم بكثير من الفتق. تركيزنا هنا اليوم عن صفة الرتق للسماء، والرتق في لسان العرب : ضِدُّ الفَتْق. ابْنُ سِيدَهْ: الرَّتْقُ إِلحام الفَتْق وإِصلاحُه. رَتَقَه يَرْتُقُه ويَرْتِقُه رَتْقاً فارْتَتَق أَي التأَم. يُقَالُ: رَتَقْنا فَتْقَهم حَتَّى ارْتَتَق، والرَّتْق: المَرْتوق. وَفِي التَّنْزِيلِ: أَوَلَمْ يَرَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَنَّ السَّماواتِ وَالْأَرْضَ كانَتا رَتْقاً فَفَتَقْناهُما؛ قَالَ بَعْضُ الْمُفَسِّرِينَ: كَانَتِ السموات رتْقاً لَا يَنْزِلُ مِنْهَا رَجْع، وَكَانَتِ الأَرض رتْقاً لَيْسَ فِيهَا صَدْع فَفَتَقَهُمَا اللَّهُ تَعَالَى بِالْمَاءِ وَالنَّبَاتِ رِزْقاً لِلْعِبَادِ. قَالَ الْفَرَّاءُ: فُتِقت السَّمَاءُ بالقَطر والأَرض بالنبْت، قَالَ: وَقَالَ كَانَتَا رَتْقًا وَلَمْ يَقُلْ رَتْقَيْنِ لأَنه أُخذ مِنَ الْفِعْلِ، وَقَالَ الزَّجَّاجُ: قِيلَ رَتْقًا لأَن الرَّتْقَ مَصْدَرٌ؛ الْمَعْنَى كَانَتَا ذَوَاتَيْ رَتْق فَجُعِلَتَا ذَوَاتَيْ فَتْق. 

وهذا يعني ان السماء ماهي الا نظام محكم ( وَٱلسَّمَاۤءِ ذَاتِ ٱلۡحُبُكِ)،  فهي مغلقه عنا لاتفتق الا باذنه ولاتفتح ابوابها الا باذنه، ولاتنشق يوم القيامة الا باذنه وما يعزل السماء عن الأرض هو سقف صنعه الله رحمة لعبادة (وَجَعَلْنَا السَّمَاءَ سَقْفًا مَّحْفُوظًا ۖ وَهُمْ عَنْ آيَاتِهَا مُعْرِضُونَ)، فهو يحفظ السماء من الوقوع على الارض وكذلك هذا السقف هو المانع الذي يمنع نزول أي شيء من السماء الى الأرض الا بإذن الله، فنعلم ان الملائكة والروح والماء والشهب تنزل من السماء وقد يكون هناك غير هذا. ولكل من المخلوقات طريقة تختلف عن غيرها للوصول للأرض. 

وعكس هذا، لا يستطيع النفاذ الى السماء اي من الإنس أو الجان الا بإذنه. قال تعالى: (يَا مَعْشَرَ الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنسِ إِنِ اسْتَطَعْتُمْ أَن تَنفُذُوا مِنْ أَقْطَارِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ فَانفُذُوا ۚ لَا تَنفُذُونَ إِلَّا بِسُلْطَانٍ)، وقد حذر ابن عثيمين من الخوض في تفسير هذة الآية فمنهم من فسر السلطان بأنه العلم وغيره. هذة الآية تختص بأهوال يوم القيامة ونفهم منها ان الله تحدى الثقلين بتعدي اقطار السماء واختراق سقفها وكذلك اقطار الأرض، فإذا كان هذا مستحيلا يوم القيامة فهو ايضا مستحيلا في وقتنا الحالي، لان أقطار السموات والارض خلقت مع خلق السموات والارض في ستة أيام. ويدعم هذا آيات بينات تتحدث عن رجوم الشياطين، فهذا المارد اللذي يطير وهو أخف من الإنسان ( وَحِفْظًا مِّن كُلِّ شَيْطَانٍ مَّارِدٍ)،  المارد لايستطيع إختراق السماء، وكذلك الجن الذين يتسلقون الى السماء ( وَأَنَّا لَمَسْنَا السَّمَاءَ فَوَجَدْنَاهَا مُلِئَتْ حَرَسًا شَدِيدًا وَشُهُبًا)،  فكذلك الإنسان المخلوق من الطين ثقيل الوزن والكتله هو وما اكتشفه من اختراعات وإن كانت صرح أو حتى سلم ( أَمْ لَهُمْ سُلَّمٌ يَسْتَمِعُونَ فِيهِ ۖ فَلْيَأْتِ مُسْتَمِعُهُم بِسُلْطَانٍ مُّبِينٍ)، وهذا خطاب للمشركين وفِي تفسير الطبري:أم لهم سلم يرتقون فيه إلى السماء يستمعون عليه الوحي، فيدعون أنهم سمعوا هنالك من الله أن الذي هم عليه حقّ، فهم بذلك متمسكون بما هم عليه. ونفهم من هُنَا ان الصعود الى السماء ماهو الا امر عظيم من عند الله، ولا يمكن حدوثه مهما تطور العلم، حقيقة وان لم تعجب الكثير.   فكيف لنا ان ننتقل من الأرض الى السماء بوجود كل هذة العوائق من اختلافات في الوزن والكتلة، درجات حرارة لانعلم بها ولكن حذّر منها من أدعى انه صعد للسماء، وسقف مانع للدخول والخروج؟ (وَقَالَ فِرْعَوْنُ يَا هَامَانُ ابْنِ لِي صَرْحًا لَّعَلِّي أَبْلُغُ الْأَسْبَابَ) فكان فرعون مثلاً في القرآن ليوضح لنا ماتفعله بعض الحكومات ووكالات الفضاء اليوم الذي جعل من أمرا سياسي حدث علمي تاريخي وفي الحقيقة ان كل الأمر ماهو الا طغيان وفساد. 

او كيف لك ان تنتقل من مكان في الأرض الى مكان آخر في الأرض قبل ان يرتد إليك طرفك؟ (قَالَ الَّذِي عِندَهُ عِلْمٌ مِّنَ الْكِتَابِ أَنَا آتِيكَ بِهِ قَبْلَ أَن يَرْتَدَّ إِلَيْكَ طَرْفُكَ ۚ فَلَمَّا رَآهُ مُسْتَقِرًّا عِندَهُ قَالَ هَٰذَا مِن فَضْلِ رَبِّي لِيَبْلُوَنِي أَأَشْكُرُ أَمْ أَكْفُرُ ۖ وَمَن شَكَرَ فَإِنَّمَا يَشْكُرُ لِنَفْسِهِ ۖ وَمَن كَفَرَ فَإِنَّ رَبِّي غَنِيٌّ كَرِيمٌ)، لاعلم لنا بهذا الا اننا نعلم انه إنسان عنده علم الكتاب لكن عند تفكرنا بهذا نجد انها نفس المبدأ الذي يسمح بالانتقال عبر السموات في زمن قصير جدا  ومثل ذلك قصة المعراج التي لاشبيه لها لكن نتحدث عن سرعة التنقل وكذلك انتقال الجن من مكان لآخر. 

فالأسباب وان لم اجد اي وصف افضل لها إلا انها بوابات في السماء وقد يكون مثلها في الأرض ولايعلم بها الا من سخرها الله له (أَمْ لَهُم مُّلْكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا ۖ فَلْيَرْتَقُوا فِي الْأَسْبَابِ) ولا يحدث هذا من دون وجود سلطان من الله، وها نحن نتحدث عن احد الآيات التي أتى بها رسولنا الكريم وهي صعوده الى السماء من القدس لنفهم انها معجزه تفتحت فيها لنبينا أبواب السموات  لتكون حجة للعالمين، حجة من المستحيل ان إنسان بشري يستطيع حتى  تنفيذ اطراف منها. فكيف نستطيع القول ان الإنسان وصل الى العلم الذي مكنه من الصعود الى مايسمى “فضاء” وهو فعلا لم يحصل كما كثرت الأقاويل والإثباتات لهذا. تعريف الإنسان لكلمة فضاء اي فراغ هو اكبر دليل على جهل الإنسان بمعرفة ماهو في السماء، لأن الله ذكر ان في السماء ماء وليس فراغ، والسماء الدنيا هي السماء الموجودة فيها النجوم والكواكب وليست المنطقة الموجودة في نطاق الارض التي تحتوي على السحب. ليس هناك مايثبت اننا نستطيع الصعود الى السماء ويوجدكلام الله الذي ينفي هذا (إِنَّ الَّذِينَ كَذَّبُوا بِآيَاتِنَا وَاسْتَكْبَرُوا عَنْهَا لَا تُفَتَّحُ لَهُمْ أَبْوَابُ السَّمَاءِ وَلَا يَدْخُلُونَ الْجَنَّةَ حَتَّىٰ يَلِجَ الْجَمَلُ فِي سَمِّ الْخِيَاطِ ۚ وَكَذَٰلِكَ نَجْزِي الْمُجْرِمِينَ) 

أليس هذا افضل من اي كتاب رياضيات، كيمياء وفيزياء؟

فلنتدبر ونتفكر في الآيات التي ذكر لنا الله فيها السماء والأرض لنجد ان السماء ماهي الا رزق ورحمة من عنده ( أَلَمۡ یَرَوۡا۟ كَمۡ أَهۡلَكۡنَا مِن قَبۡلِهِم مِّن قَرۡنࣲ مَّكَّنَّـٰهُمۡ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ مَا لَمۡ نُمَكِّن لَّكُمۡ وَأَرۡسَلۡنَا ٱلسَّمَاۤءَ عَلَیۡهِم مِّدۡرَارࣰا وَجَعَلۡنَا ٱلۡأَنۡهَـٰرَ تَجۡرِی مِن تَحۡتِهِمۡ فَأَهۡلَكۡنَـٰهُم بِذُنُوبِهِمۡ وَأَنشَأۡنَا مِنۢ بَعۡدِهِمۡ قَرۡنًا ءَاخَرِینَ)، فالسماء تفتق لينهمر الماء على الأرض (فَفَتَحۡنَاۤ أَبۡوَ ٰ⁠بَ ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ بِمَاۤءࣲ مُّنۡهَمِرࣲ)، وللسماء مهام كثيرة أخرى فمثلا يوجد فيها نجوم وكوكب لتكون مصابيح وزينة وهدى للطريق، لكن لم يذكر الله أبداً انه خلق السماء ليمكن الإنسان فيها، فالسماء لأهل السماء لكن سخرها الله للإنسان وهذه رحمة وفضل كبير فلنشكر الواحد الأحد على هذا. فانظر الى الآيات المقرونة بافعال الإنسان في الأرض ( أَلَمۡ یَرَوۡا۟ كَمۡ أَهۡلَكۡنَا مِن قَبۡلِهِم مِّن قَرۡنࣲ مَّكَّنَّـٰهُمۡ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡض)، (ٱلَّذِینَ إِن مَّكَّنَّـٰهُمۡ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ أَقَامُوا۟ ٱلصَّلَوٰةَ وَءَاتَوُا۟ ٱلزَّكَوٰةَ وَأَمَرُوا۟ بِٱلۡمَعۡرُوفِ وَنَهَوۡا۟ عَنِ ٱلۡمُنكَرِۗ وَلِلَّهِ عَـٰقِبَةُ ٱلۡأُمُورِ)، ( وَلَقَدۡ مَكَّنَّـٰكُمۡ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَجَعَلۡنَا لَكُمۡ فِیهَا مَعَـٰیِشَۗ قَلِیلࣰا مَّا تَشۡكُرُونَ)، أو حتى على المستوى الشخصي ( إِنَّا مَكَّنَّا لَهُۥ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَءَاتَیۡنَـٰهُ مِن كُلِّ شَیۡءࣲ سَبَبا)، وحتى فعل الإفساد في الأرض ( ٱلَّذِینَ یُفۡسِدُونَ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَلَا یُصۡلِحُونَ)، وكذلك ( وَكَانَ فِی ٱلۡمَدِینَةِ تِسۡعَةُ رَهۡطࣲ یُفۡسِدُونَ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَلَا یُصۡلِحُونَ)، وكذلك فعل المشي في الأرض (هُوَ ٱلَّذِی جَعَلَ لَكُمُ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ ذَلُولࣰا فَٱمۡشُوا۟ فِی مَنَاكِبِهَا وَكُلُوا۟ مِن رِّزۡقِهِۦۖ وَإِلَیۡهِ ٱلنُّشُورُ)، وكذلك ( قُلۡ سِیرُوا۟ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ فَٱنظُرُوا۟ كَیۡفَ بَدَأَ ٱلۡخَلۡقَۚ ثُمَّ ٱللَّهُ یُنشِئُ ٱلنَّشۡأَةَ ٱلآخرة إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَیۡءࣲ قَدِير)

فتكررت (سيروا في الأرض) ثلاث عشر مرة ولاتوجد آية واحدة تستدل على تمكين الإنسان في السماء، او فساده، او سيره فيها. اقترنت السماء بالإنزال والإرسال وهذا لنشكر الله فالسماء وحِفظها ورجعها ( وَٱلسَّمَاۤءِ ذَاتِ ٱلرَّجۡعِ)، ماهي الا رحمة من عند الله. وايضاً هي من جنود الله ( فَبَدَّلَ ٱلَّذِینَ ظَلَمُوا۟ قَوۡلًا غَیۡرَ ٱلَّذِی قِیلَ لَهُمۡ فَأَنزَلۡنَا عَلَى ٱلَّذِینَ ظَلَمُوا۟ رِجۡزࣰا مِّنَ ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ بِمَا كَانُوا۟ یَفۡسُقُونَ)، فملخص هذا ان افعال الانسان تكون في الأرض بينما ارزاقه تكون في السماء (وَفِی ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ رِزۡقُكُمۡ وَمَا تُوعَدُونَ)، وعندما ذكر الله صعود الإنسان للسماء في كتابه، لم يكن الا استنكاراً على ما يقوله المشركين فهو تحدي لهم ( أَمۡ لَهُمۡ سُلَّم یَسۡتَمِعُونَ فِیهِۖ فَلۡیَأۡتِ مُسۡتَمِعُهُم بِسُلۡطَـٰنࣲ مُّبِین)، فبهذه الآية، هل نستطيع القول انهم اقتربوا من سقف السماء ليسترقوا السمع؟ فإذا وجدت فعلاً محطة الفضاء الدولية، فلماذا لا تاتينا صور حقيقة للأرض؟  فبعد كل هذة الآيات البينات والحجج، ستصدق كذبة الصعود الى القمر ووجود الأقمار الصناعية في الفضاء؟ لا اعتقد ان إنسان مؤمن عاقل يتدبر آيات الله سيقول بهذا. 

نأتي لموضوع تسمية القمر الصناعي، ولنتحدث فقط عن فكره تسميته بقمر صناعي او ساتالايت، فكلمة ساتالايت لا تعني قمر لكن تعريفها وبإمكانك الإطلاع على التعريف في أي مكان، هو مجسم مصنوع من الحديد، يعتبر مثل القمر لانه يدور إما حول الأرض او حول كواكب أخرى. هذا تعريفة. تعريفي له من وجهة نظر فلسفية نستند على حقائق دينية ولغوية هو القمر الصناعي الذي حاول الإنسان عن طريقه ان يثبت لنفسه انه قادر على صنع اقمار مثل خلق الله، وهي من باب مساواة المخلوق بالخالق والعياذ بالله، وهذا مايقولونه هؤلاء من لايصدقون الا العلم بل ويعبدونه. لم تبقي الإنترنت خبراً وإلا تحدثت عنه، فلماذا لاتبحث عن كذبة الصعود الى الفضاء وكذبة الأقمار الصناعية وبكل اللغات؟ 

قال تعالى:   ( وَعَلَّمَ ءَادَمَ ٱلۡأَسۡمَاۤءَ كُلَّهَا ثُمَّ عَرَضَهُمۡ عَلَى ٱلۡمَلَـٰۤىِٕكَةِ فَقَالَ أَنۢبِـُٔونِی بِأَسۡمَاۤءِ هَـٰۤؤُلَاۤءِ إِن كُنتُمۡ صَـٰدِقِینَ)، فهل تعتقد ان كلمة قمر صناعي موجودة من القدم أم مستحدثه؟ 

قال الله:  (قَالَ قَدۡ وَقَعَ عَلَیۡكُم مِّن رَّبِّكُمۡ رِجۡس وَغَضَبٌۖ أَتُجَـٰدِلُونَنِی فِیۤ أَسۡمَاۤءࣲ سَمَّیۡتُمُوهَاۤ أَنتُمۡ وَءَابَاۤؤُكُم مَّا نَزَّلَ ٱللَّهُ بِهَا مِن سُلۡطَـٰنࣲۚ فَٱنتَظِرُوۤا۟ إِنِّی مَعَكُم مِّنَ ٱلۡمُنتَظِرِینَ)، وهذا خطاب للمشركين وعلى تسميتهم لاصنامهم لكن هل ترى العلاقة هنا؟  لانتحدث عن تسمية القمر الصناعي فقط لكن كوّن تشبيه القمر الصناعي بأحد آيات الله ومخلوقاته العظيمة التي لانعلم عنها الكثير الى اليوم، فلا نعلم كيف أنشق القمر والى اليوم هناك عدة نظريات وأقاويل حول ضوءة وتحول شكله. هل في نظرك ان هذة التسمية سليمة وليست شركية؟ 

قال ابن عاشور في تفسير الآية، ولَمّا قَدَّمَ إنْذارَهم بِغَضَبِ اللَّهِ عادَ إلى الِاحْتِجاجِ عَلَيْهِمْ بِفَسادِ مُعْتَقَدِهِمْ فَأنْكَرَ عَلَيْهِمْ أنْ يُجادِلُوا في شَأْنِ أصْنامِهِمْ.

والمُجادَلَةُ: المُحاجَّةُ.

وعَبَّرَ عَنِ الأصْنامِ بِأنَّها أسْماءٌ، أيْ هي مُجَرَّدُ أسْماءٍ لَيْسَتْ لَها الحَقائِقُ الَّتِي اعْتَقَدُوها ووَضَعُوا لَها الأسْماءَ لِأجْلِ اسْتِحْضارِها، فَبِذَلِكَ كانَتْ تِلْكَ الأسْماءُ المَوْضُوعَةُ مُجَرَّدَ ألْفاظٍ، لِانْتِفاءِ الحَقائِقِ الَّتِي وضَعُوا الأسْماءَ لِأجْلِها. فَإنَّ الأسْماءَ تُوضَعُ لِلْمُسَمَّياتِ المَقْصُودَةِ مِنَ التَّسْمِيَةِ، وهم إنَّما وضَعُوا لَها الأسْماءَ واهْتَمُّوا بِها بِاعْتِبارِ كَوْنِ الإلَهِيَّةِ جُزْءًا مِنَ المُسَمّى المَوْضُوعِ لَهُ الِاسْمُ، وهو الدّاعِي إلى التَّسْمِيَةِ، فَمَعانِي الإلَهِيَّةِ وما يَتْبَعُها مُلاحَظَةٌ لِمَن وضَعَ تِلْكَ الأسْماءَ، فَلَمّا كانَتِ المَعانِي المَقْصُودَةُ مِن تِلْكَ الأسْماءِ مُنْتَفِيَةً كانَتِ الأسْماءُ لا مُسَمَّياتٍ لَها بِذَلِكَ الِاعْتِبارِ

قال الله:  (  قُلۡ أَرَءَیۡتُمۡ شُرَكَاۤءَكُمُ ٱلَّذِینَ تَدۡعُونَ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ أَرُونِی مَاذَا خَلَقُوا۟ مِنَ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ أَمۡ لَهُمۡ شِرۡكࣱ فِی ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ أَمۡ ءَاتَیۡنَـٰهُمۡ كِتَـٰبࣰا فَهُمۡ عَلَىٰ بَیِّنَتࣲ مِّنۡهُۚ بَلۡ إِن یَعِدُ ٱلظَّـٰلِمُونَ بَعۡضُهُم بَعۡضًا إِلَّا غُرُورًا)، هل أنتم بخلقكم هذة الأقمار تشاركتم مع الله في خلق السماء؟ 

قال الله :   (إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ یُمۡسِكُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰ⁠تِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ أَن تَزُولَاۚ وَلَىِٕن زَالَتَاۤ إِنۡ أَمۡسَكَهُمَا مِنۡ أَحَد مِّنۢ بَعۡدِهِۦۤۚ إِنَّهُۥ كَانَ حَلِیمًا غَفُورࣰا)، فان الله مثبت السماء ومثبت الأرض لايتحركون ولكن مايوجد في السماء من كواكب ونجوم هم من يتحركون في افلاك (وكل في فلك يسبحون)، لاحظ كلمة (وكل)، اي هناك افلاك مخلوقة خصيصاً لهذة النجوم والكواكب، فما هي الأفلاك التي تدور فيها هذة الأقمار؟ لايحتوي هذا القمر الصناعي على نفس المعادن الموجودة في هذة الكواكب، لايوجد في هذا القمر الصناعي نفس الخواص الموجودة في هذة النجوم والكواكب، لايأخذ هذا القمر الصناعي نفس الشكل الذي خلق الله به هذة الكواكب والنجوم، فكيف له ان يدور في مداراتها؟ على الانسان ان يخلق المدار الخاص بقمره ايضاً. 

ثم لنأتي الى موضوع وجود الأقمار في مجال الأرض، لن اتحدث عن هذا هنا لان ماكتب هنا لم يكتب مستنداً على ماتم إكتشافه من حقائق ولكن على ماهو موجود في كتاب الله. هل توجد مجسمات تحلق وتطير في مجال الأرض ؟ الجواب نعم. هل هي معلقة بسبب قله الجاذبية في الأعلى؟ الجواب لا وان يسهل عليها الطيران وهي في الأعلى كالقفز من الطيارة والتحليق في الهواء او بالون الهيليوم الذي يرتفع وبعد كم يوم يهبط الى الأرض. 

The Maximilian


The story of rockets in a song called By his name, the Nazi of NASA, the Maximilian.

Here is the thing about NASA’s infra structure, half of its scientists were graduated and lived in Israel. A zaionist establishment that concluded a nazi that burned them in the past. Another symbolic representation of showing victory over those who excluded them from the world.

Yes look into the decision makers of the agency, and you will know. Well, the irony that the whole American system is infected with the same poison. Now imagine!

Don’t be mesmerised by NASA’s projects, indeed some of the projects were great, and made by innocent people. But look into the vision, a weapon of destruction!

How evil is to let your opponent live the illusion, and in fact create one for them. For example, you let them go to space.


You can’t disprove this!

One love

Tech companies need to apologize for invading people’s privacy, and making our younger generation stupid. Governments need to apologize to the whole world for their war crimes that resulted our step back. People need to forgive each other and understand that following the policy of those two, may generate hatred in the world!

A space oddity – part 2

The accumulated knowledge through time is what made the human intelligence. Noticeably, the last century witnessed a drop in the development of our understanding of the surroundings. We are two steps back heading towards idiocracy. With such crisis, blesses come from the sky to enlighten mankind. To remind the people of the existence of god and to ensure that we all understand that he is the one and only, with no father and no sun. He plants the seed in few of his selected people to make them as an example for all. NASA Claims that earth is a globe, and many believed this theory. After all, It is just a theory with no proof what so ever. Indeed it is none sense to force the idea that supports the flatness of the earth. However,  understanding the shape of the earth and the movements of stars are clearly a matter of faith.  What is hidden is that the earth has edges and is static.  The Quran and Bible described the shape of the earth and indicated its flatness and stability. What to believe  is the question? The answer believe in then in the one who created all of this. Isn’t this simple

The matter is all about ethics and values. Knowledge and information, if not produced from a trusted source, then it is excluded. Indeed an agency such as NASA must have lost its credibility because of its affiliation with evil authorities. We are all aware that the power of money, authority and media, can fix everything. People are not idiots any more. However, I feel sorry for the innocents who became faithless puppets following whatever the devil is telling them. The devil who legalised gay marriage, abortion, and excluded religion from schools. We must respect all theories about earth indeed. What is more important is to see what our holy books are telling us. The holy Quran did mention everything and anything that we know or don’t know. From the shape of the earth, to the creation of the universe or even the gates of the sky and the way they can be accessed. With his wisdom, not everyone can see what is within the Quran unless a hard  work is done with a pure heart. He does not want us to be dependent too. The old scripture, the bible, in the religion of Christianity and Judaism, explained that earth is not a globe. Richard E Byrd, a trusted explorer, American naval officer who scanned Antarctica for several years, revealed that earth has edges. A word from him equals a 1000 words from NASA’s none sense. Neil Degrassi also stated that the planet earth looks tike a pearl.  Ask yourself, how come the united nation did not change their logo which is based on the old flat earth structure? What happened with NASA is that they shot earth from top which will look like a globe. Know that the distance between earth and the sky is by itself can be called as space, a very long distance that space crafts can reach. This is the boundary and no one can cross that unless a permission is granted from the creator. this is a matter of the end of time mostly. This tiny information is stated clearly in the Holy Quran. Therefore, the first person who will provide the truth about all of this is a believer  and a space boy. A person who believed in judgment day and believed that god has no father and no son. Think this, if the creator who created all of this wanted to tell someone the truth about all of this, it can happen within a blink of an eye with no technology and without a spaceship. then look into gravity, god said that everything  is made by water. So how do we call space space and why we ignore electromagnetism.

I want to love NASA and believe in what stories they release through their beloved news channels, but the more I read about their space experiments, we find more lies. Buzz Aldrin, an X NASA astronaut and an Air Force pilot, admitted that the whole moon travel is a lie, and never happened. The BBC produced a full documentary to prove that this was a lie. Read the Holy Quran and the Bible and notice the contradictions in NASA’s projects. Indeed NASA has produced great projects and has great and loyal people, but the fact that it is a US military weapon, people should be aware of what weapons that NASA is creating before they destroy humanity. If you are a believer, no matter what religion, you should have heard about the beast(Dajal), a king who teleports and controls the weather. In case you don’t know how he will control the weather, it is basically through a NASA technology called HAARP. HAARP technologies are worst than a nuclear weapon. All of this is just wrong!



The space invaders and the future of text

The relationship between technology and place can be a key concept that perhaps will assist to conduct a successful investigation leading to invent better technologies.  As Marshal Mucluhan referred to technology as it is an extinction of the body and the mind, arguing that television consumption led to transform our perceptual systems and thinking (1994), many digital thinkers believed that Mcluhan’s concept of perception applies to the digital technologies of today (Bolteret al.2013). However, the complex characteristics of the emerging technologies, and their rapid growth, may require further serious research and experimentations in the field of media understanding and aesthetics. As a result of the new identities in the features within modern day technologies,  Bolter, Engberg and Maclntyre argued that media aesthetics are not singular as Macluhan suggested, this is because users are not passive anymore (2013). Far apart from the relationship between the television and their audiences, today’s technologies rely on the participation of the individual to create, design, and share the environment (Bolteret al.2013). This feedback circle that the users experience emphasizes on the the importance of redefining our understanding  of how we perceive our environment through technology (Bolteret al.2013). Thus, creating the technologies of tomorrow requires a clear understanding of the effects of modern day technologies, and how they are designed and for what purpose. A great question that may arise is about the level of participation of the individual in the creation and design of the environment through technology. One gateway to understand technologies is to consider the study of place. Before this study introduces place. Place can be computational or natural (Harrison and Dourish 1996). In this study, I will argue that the technology that incorporates the use of natural place is a key to provide a better safe life for our future generation.

Important concepts and movements have emphasized that the physical space is a source of disturbance and it is senseless. The ideas that ensured that reality should be vague and hidden within our output through a selection of information from the past (Manovich 2002, Smith 2003, SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009, Armitage 2015, Kozíket al.2015). This is to discuss postmodernism and what relates to it. Postmodernism served well in the account of philosophy, literature, film, and arts (SHEEHAN and 2004). Perhaps, it also supported the growth of both fields of the interactive arts and net arts (Manovich 2002, Lim and Yoo 2014). This includes the studies that confirmed the connection between new media and postmodernism (Rohle 2005). However, I believe that the relationship between new media and postmodernism should be different. To understand postmodernism, it is crucial to investigate modernity, a movement that died but its roots maintained. Modernity is the “modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence. This associates modernity with a time period and with an initial geographical location, but for the moment leaves its major characteristics safely stowed away in a black box” (Giddens 1967, p.1). Anthony Giddens, in his book the consequences of modernity, emphasized that one of the features of modernity is the separation between time and space (1967). Indeed, this leads to the expansion of knowledge and information, but also weakens our perception of understanding science (Giddens 1967). Similarly, postmodernism is a movement of arts that has been evolved over the years. “Post-modernism, if it means anything, is best kept to refer to styles or movements within literature, painting, the plastic arts, and architecture. It concerns aspects of aesthetic reflection upon the nature of modernity” (Giddens 1967, p.45).  A vast number of studies have included that postmodernism should be replaced, already has been replaced, or it just needs enhancements (SHEEHAN and 2004, Kirby 2009).  For example, the works of  Alan Kirby illustrated how new technologies replaced postmodernism in to what is called digimodernism, which reconfigured our culture (Kirby 2009). Some studies indicated that the movement reached its strength between the 1970s and 1980s, and started to slow down in the 1990s (SHEEHAN and 2004). However, the influence of postmodernism remained clear in the works of many recent new media studies such as (Rohle 2005, Manovich 2013). Let me paraphrase my argument to make it clear, I am arguing that the new media should not only aim to teach us how to have certain visual skills, but also we should learn from it how to build things. Familiarizing the physical space. New media is not only for relocating icons and symbols on the computer screen. This new pattern requires a different kind of knowledge. A knowledge that equals the visual space with reality. The question is: How can children learn the real science through modern day technologies ? Thus, the heart of this argument relies on understanding the importance of the natural place, nature, or reality in our visualization of computer imagery.

Lee Manovich in his book the language of new media, convincingly explained the intimate relationship between the software operations and postmodernism (2002). Stated “the practice of putting together a media object from already existing and commercially distributed media elements already existed with old media, but new media technology further standardizes it and makes it much easier to perform. What before involved scissors and glue now involves simply clicking on cut and paste. And, by encoding the operations of selection and combination into the very interfaces of authoring and editing software, new media legitimizes them. Pulling elements from databases and libraries becomes the default; creating them from scratch becomes an exception” (Manovich 2002, p.130). Also, “It is not accidental that the development of GUI which legitimized “cut and paste” logic as well as media manipulation software such as Photoshop, which popularized plug-in architecture, took place during the 1980s — the same decade when contemporary culture became post-modern.” (Manovich 2002, p.130).  From Manovich’s book, Fredric Jameson  stated “Rather than assembling more media recordings of reality, culture is now busy re-working, recombining and analyzing the already accumulated media material” (2002, p.131). This supports the concept of Manovich in which that the software “made postmodernism possible” (2002, p.131). Furthermore, in the brilliant work of Dziga Vertov, in the definition of modernization, the physical space was expressed  as a source of disruption (Manovich 2002). The ability to simulate old media in a computer, that later can be easily shared over networks, that what Manovich was discussing, considered the computer as a metamedium that enables other software mediums to take commands, and combine various media forms in one place, which form the concept of software hybridization (2013). The ideas of Manovich serve well in seeking the answer to the question of the level of the individual participation in the design and the creation of the environment. However, Manovich is a new media artist, designer, animator, programmer, and a film theorist (2002). Thus, the spirit of his works is based on his perception of the software environment, and arts. If there is a discussion about place in Manovich’s books, it is from a computational point of view such as his discussion about the GIS systems. The idea is that the software is taking the command in which software becomes a replacement of a large array of ancient physical, mechanical, and electronic technologies to create  new interfaces that interact with cultural artefacts (Manovich 2013). Monovich considered the hardware as a support that enhances our creations in the virtual space (Manovich 2013). For example, the mouse, the keyboard, or even the laptop are just tools to assist us in working in the virtual interface. Indeed the software is taking command, but an interesting question that I may seek to answer, what is the role of the hardware environment in the rapid revolution of the science of artificial intelligence, and materiality interactions? As it is already evolving. “The cost and complexity of hardware-centric systems can often be reduced by using software to perform tasks which don’t appear on the critical path. Alternately, the performance of software can sometimes be improved by using special purpose hardware to implement tasks which do appear on the critical path. Whatever the motivation, most modern systems are composed of both hardware and software components. Given the importance of the connection between hardware and software in these systems, it is surprising how little automated and machine-checkable support there is for co-design space exploration” (Kinget al.2015, p.1). The study aimed to limit the gap between hardware and software to enable the developers to create rapid systems (Kinget al.2015).  There are different possibilities on the consequences of the next generation hardware development. In some areas where solar energy takes place, the nature is the source that makes a system work, rather than electricity. MIT professor Vladimir Bulović, researched the numerous opportunities in the developments of nanotechnology and solar energy that may rise the technology into a whole new level (MOCHARI 2015). What I am trying to reach here is that there will be a time where   humans will be able to learn, design, create arts, and construct in a different way using hardware technologies and other physical devices. As an initial point, the semiotic language within a computer screen, should find a good start to live outside the digital box, or the computer. For example, the hologram of no goggles and peripherals.

Indeed, postmodernism is important. The positive value of pluralism is clear. Through the important role of “radical pluralism in democracy, tolerance and diversity”, it supported the practice of the “freedom of expression” (Kozíket al.2015, p.119). The way that postmodernism symbolically represents the world have opened the gates into a new kind of knowledge (Kozíket al.2015). The question is: will this kind of knowledge survive with the future technologies? will it survive the new evolution of mankind?   The best definition that explains the use of postmodernism in the computer might be: “that condition in which for the first time, and as a result of technologies that allow large-scale storage, access, and reproduction of records of the past, the past appears to be included in the present, or at the present’s disposal, and in which the ratio between present and past has therefore changed” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.10). Postmodernism is the base that formed the arts and literature of today (Giddens 1967, SHEEHAN and 2004).The trustful manipulation in the artefacts is what made this argument possible. According to  Manovich, the cut and paste is indeed related to postmodernism (Manovich 2002, p.131). The cut and the paste are the reasons of how I quoted Manovich extensively to argue that machines should connect to reality. It is the cut and paste that made me a computer programmer. In my masters at California Sate University East Bay, me and my partner Jeff Stott have created an interactive multimedia installation that uses the human brain to generate audiovisual content. Part of my duties was to design a patch in Max Msp to use it as a processing hub to connect all the sensors to the physical interface that we have designed. In this stage, I confirm that my study of computer science, and my few experiences in computer programming did not serve well. However, I was confident as the nature in the “automation” of new media, enables the user to become a co-author (Manovich 2002). Using the Max tutorials, manuals, and code examples – provided a complete source for constructing a Max patch. As well the user generated patches that are available on the web. Thus, this little previous knowledge in computer programming, with understanding the interactive culture and the internet, and of course the cut and paste, is what made the job done by the end of the day. Thus, we can confirm that manipulation plays a major role in the world of postmodernism.

However, manipulation is great but not in every context. The literature is trustful. This dose not mean that manipulation in real life, or in the computer is always a positive thing. In fact, when some one claims that another person manipulated him, this mainly understood as a negative situation. This kind of manipulation implies negativity, and   needs explanation to change its meaning. This is the case when the murderer commits his crime, and his lawyer makes him innocent in the eyes of the judges. In terms of computers, it is true that the internet resulted to improve the intellectual work, opportunities, and cultural change, but perhaps the artificial environment of the internet is problematic (Kozíket al.2015). Problems such as allowing the inability to distinguish between reality and virtually (Kozíket al.2015). As a consequence, it became the gateway to identity manipulation. As a result of anonymity, the internet became a great opportunity for cyber crimes with all of its kinds (Glaseret al.2002). As mentioning the benefits of the cut and paste, It is also worth to mention that it is a major contributor in the world of plagiarism. Alastair Pennycook, in his publication: “Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism” under the subject “Postmodern Uncertainty: The Death of the Author” he stated : “the notion of the author and individual creativity, and this argument that meanings are in a sense in circulation, that language is constantly cycled and recycled, raise profound questions about how we consider the notion of textual borrowing or plagiarism” (Pennycook 1996, p.211). Or in other words, postmodernism made plagiarism simple. As a result, the internet of today plays a major cause in increasing plagiarism (Howard 2007). As the conclusion of understanding how the relationship between computer texts and reality, a suggestion to avoid plagiarism is that computer texts should be more clever and connect more to reality by shifting its properties. As text should have the ability to recognise the users by the computer cameras and incorporate an automation of a plagiarism system that auto detects and auto blocks. The detection in real time by connecting the text to the physical space, or to reality is a clear suggestion. This is not an invasion of privacy. The ultimate invasion is caused by the advance in the information technology and specifically over the internet (A¨ımeur and Sch˝onfeld 2011).

This argument is all about proving that the physical space, nature, and reality will have an added value to the improvement of  new media. Thus, the aim in this argument is to trace the reasons of the exclusion of reality and space, and to prove their added value in our creation.  Paul Virilio’s views are concerned with the interaction of the human consequences with the disturbance of the physical space (Armitage 2015). Paul Virilio was a prisoner of war, and his theories basically were an escape from reality (Armitage 2015). “Virilio is the last endist, recuperating the most abiding concern of philosophical postmodernism, even as he shows its ominous determinations and potentially hazardous consequences for life in the twenty-first century (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.38). The problem in excluding the nature in the way we collect our information may result in accruing generalized knowledge only (Giddens 1967). The consequence of polarity is that it changed the ratio between the past and the present, which almost they become the same (SHEEHAN and 2004). Which made “The present of postmodernism has come to seem like a stalled present, an agitated but idle meanwhile” (SHEEHAN and 2004, p.11). “The post-modern outlook sees a plurality of heterogeneous claims to knowledge, in which science does not have a privileged place” (Giddens 1967, p.2).  “The modern mind assumed that it knew more than its predecessors because the natural and historical science were flooding it with new knowledge about nature and history, the postmodern mind argues (paradoxically) that it knows more than others did because it has discovered how little the human mind can know” (Smith 2003, p.loc 108). “If modern physics showed us a world at odds with our senses, postmodern physics is showing us one which is at odds with our imagination, where imagination is taken as imagery” (Smith 2003, p.loc 231).This explains the death of the philosophy  of the metaphysics (Smith 2003). “Leonardo da Vinci is symbolic. His anatomical studies and drawings in general disclose a direction of interest that has turned eye into camera, in his case an extraordinary camera that could stop the hawk in flight and fix the rearing steed. Once again humankind was attending to nature’s details as a potential messenger of meaning” (Smith 2003, p.loc 207).

The existence of the technology of today is a result of the great inventions from the western culture. The western inventions are the reason behind making the algorithms of Mohammed Al Khawarzmi alive. Dennis Ritchie the inventor of the C programming language, Seymour Papert the inventor of the logo language and the mechanical turtle, David Liddle the lead developer of the star system, Bill gates and his windows, Tim Berners Lee, the creator of the world wide web and the founder of the w3schools and so on. These inventions have shaped our lives. However, it is crucial for this context to mention those who think beyond nature. The different ways of thinking of Newton, Einstein, And Hawking is what led to their discoveries. It’s simply thinking about time and space from a different perspective (Hawking 1988, Lorentz 2014). In Google’s Zeitgeist conference, Hawking stated “Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics” and declared that philosophers and their arts are dead (Warman 2011). With this, we showed both extreme perspectives, the ones that support the arts, and the other that support science. I believe a middle ground will lead to a better future. Somewhere in the middle where this fusion collides to build a generation that understands the arts and science at the same time, forming a new identity of the individual. This will not be achieved by learning in schools, it should be gained from our daily technology consumption. Thus, Technology should behave differently. A question that may arise: Applied science and engineering schools do exist. Therefore, what is the reason of arguing about postmodernism? The answer is because the aim here is to build a medium that enable the next generation to learn arts and science from every day life. A life long learning game or a device for example.  A product of a new new media technology that incorporates text, images and sound . A new media that has a different identity that respects the arts and science. I believe, postmodernism is  a great symbol of arts and literature, and thus, it should not be excluded, but not giving it too much of attention because science, as Hawking believes is the future. Furthermore, I believe science with no meaning is simply worthless. Science should be hidden within our digital interfaces, and not any interface, an interface that combines reality with imagination. The previous studies that discussed the problems in the inability to distinguish between reality and imagination, this inability can be unitized for a positive cause. A generation that is in control of their magic circle.There is so much to discover in nature, and if we only keep remixing the past, we might not be able to follow up with the future technologies. One of the attributes that makes a technology emerging is the uncertainty and ambiguity (Rotoloet al.2015). Then, this defines the interest of the artist in the technology.  According to the postmodernism thoughts, humans are able to learn through imagination. Learning of course will be achieved but to a certain extent. A future artist should be able to design his/her interactive art installation with the deeper understanding of  physics, dynamics, and programming codes of his/her creation. Thus, the suggestion is a fusion of balanced science and arts in an interesting way. Which provides a true situated meaning to a clear scientific knowledge.  Can  games do this?